HMX EVA vs. HMX Xinhai

Overview

When selecting a mechanical keyboard switch, enthusiasts often find themselves torn between options that cater to their unique typing preferences, and two notable choices are the HMX EVA and the HMX Xinhai, both linear switches but with distinct characteristics. The HMX EVA stands out with its inspiration from the iconic colors of Evangelion Unit-01, offering a resonant sound signature and a silky smooth typing experience that appeals to those who value a seamless feel while typing. On the other hand, the HMX Xinhai is celebrated for its unique PA12 top housing that delivers a softer acoustic profile, enhanced by a POM stem that produces a distinctively crisp, higher-pitched resonance. This combination creates a typing experience that many users describe as bouncy and clacky, perfect for those who appreciate a lively feel. While both switches provide excellent linear performance, their acoustics and tactile feedback cater to different user preferences. However, let’s dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the ideal switch for your needs.

By the numbers

HMX EVA Linear

HMX Xinhai Linear

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

The housing materials used in the HMX EVA and HMX Xinhai switches are both constructed from nylon, a classic choice in the keyboard switch industry. This similarity in material choice has a significant impact on the resulting acoustic profile of both switches, as nylon's softer characteristics lead to a deeper and fuller sound during typing. Both the top and bottom housings of the EVA and the Xinhai provide a consistent sound profile, absorbing sound effectively and contributing to a rounder and duller auditory experience. Consequently, users can expect similar auditory feedback when typing on either switch, as the fundamental qualities imparted by the nylon material remain uniform across both models.

While the EVA and Xinhai differ primarily in their design features rather than the materials themselves, the use of nylon in both the top and bottom housings plays a crucial role in shaping the overall feel and sound. In terms of performance, the bottom housing generally has a greater influence on the bottom-out sound and tactile feedback, while the top housing contributes more to the sound created upon key release. Since both switches utilize nylon for their housings, the fundamental acoustic properties will be analogous, ensuring that users have a comparable typing experience regardless of their choice between the EVA and the Xinhai.

In summary, the HMX EVA and HMX Xinhai can be seen as fundamentally aligned due to their shared use of nylon housing materials. This commonality not only ensures consistency in sound profile and tactile feedback but also implies that the overall user experience will be similar. Thus, whether one opts for the EVA or the Xinhai, they can anticipate a rich, pleasant typing sound and feel, underscored by the characteristics of nylon that dominate each model's construction.

Weight

When comparing the actuation and bottom out forces of the HMX EVA linear switch and the HMX Xinhai linear switch, we find that both options exhibit relatively light characteristics, which makes them suitable for prolonged typing sessions or extended gaming durations. The EVA switch has an actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, while the Xinhai switch features a slightly lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams. This means that the Xinhai switch is the lighter choice overall, promoting a more effortless typing experience. In contrast, the EVA’s slightly heavier forces provide a more substantial feel, appealing to users who might prefer a stronger push when typing. Despite these differences, both switches are considered light, and users can expect a comfortable typing experience from either option.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the HMX EVA linear switch and the HMX Xinhai linear switch, there is a slight difference: the EVA has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the Xinhai features a shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm. This means that the EVA switch will provide a bit more key travel, delivering a more pronounced tactile sensation with each keystroke, which may appeal to users who prefer a deeper, more substantial feel. On the other hand, the Xinhai, with its shorter travel distance, is likely to offer quicker responsiveness, making it a potentially better choice for gamers or those who favor swift key presses. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches hinges on personal preference—whether one prioritizes depth and feedback with the EVA or speed and agility with the Xinhai.

Price comparison

Typing experience

The sound profile of the HMX EVA switch is characterized by a resonant quality that may evoke a certain depth and fullness, potentially offering a unique auditory experience that is pleasant for both the user and those nearby. In contrast, the HMX Xinhai switch is noted for its clacky nature, producing a sharper and more percussive sound that can be described as bright and snappy. This difference in sound production means that while the EVA may provide a more rounded and resonant sound, the Xinhai delivers an engaging, rhythmic auditory feedback that could appeal to users who enjoy a more pronounced clicky sound when typing.

When it comes to feel, the fabrication of the HMX EVA switch results in a silky smooth typing experience, offering a comfortable and nearly effortless glide through keystrokes. This contrasts with the HMX Xinhai switch, which elevates the typing experience with a blend of bouncy feedback and a creamy sensation. The bouncy characteristic gives a spring-like response, ensuring that each key returns with a lively rebound, while the creamy texture enhances the overall typing smoothness, making every press feel luxurious. Thus, users who prioritize a fluid typing experience might lean towards the EVA, while those seeking a more dynamic and satisfying tactile response would find the Xinhai appealing.

In conclusion, while the HMX EVA and HMX Xinhai linear switches differ significantly in sound and feel, both options offer quality typing experiences suited for different preferences. The EVA's resonant sound and smooth feel contrast with the Xinhai's clacky auditory profile and its exciting combination of bouncy and creamy sensations. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on whether one prioritizes the soothing continuity of the EVA or the lively, expressive characteristics of the Xinhai. Both switches will deliver satisfactory results, but they do so in their distinct ways, catering to varying tastes in sound and feel.

Conclusion

To conclude, the choice between the HMX EVA and the HMX Xinhai linear switches primarily hinges on your personal preferences in typing feel and sound profile. If you lean toward a typing experience that's light and smooth, with a unique sound signature reminiscent of its vibrant namesake, the EVA switch is an excellent option for you. Its bottom out force of 48 grams ensures a gentle key press, making it suitable for long typing sessions where comfort is key. On the other hand, if you prefer a more dynamic feel with a bouncy, elastic feedback along with a crisper acoustic profile, the HMX Xinhai might be your ideal pick. Its slightly lighter bottom out force of 45 grams can provide a lively and responsive touch, perfect for fast or gaming-focused typing. In essence, your selection should align with whether you favor the silky sensation of the EVA or the lively and sophisticated feel of the Xinhai. Each switch has its unique appeal, making them well-suited for different use cases and preferences.

Mentioned in this article

HMX EVA Linear

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

Learn more

HMX Xinhai Linear

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

Learn more