United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron Everfree (EF) Cedar vs. KTT MoonRosa

An in-depth look at the Gateron Everfree (EF) Cedar and the KTT MoonRosa switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Gateron Everfree (EF) Cedar and the KTT MoonRosa, both linear switches offer distinct advantages that cater to different typing preferences. The Everfree Cedar switch stands out for its smooth and reliable performance, making it a cost-effective option for those seeking a satisfying and poppy sound profile, which can enhance the auditory experience of typing. Conversely, the MoonRosa switch is celebrated for its all-POM construction, providing a buttery smooth typing experience with a neutral sound signature that appeals to users who prefer quieter operation without the distractions of significant sound feedback. While the Everfree lends itself to a more tactile audio experience, the MoonRosa focuses on a sleek, smooth performance that's easy on the fingers. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for your typing needs.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

55g

Actuation force

37g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Bottom-out force

45g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.80 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Double-staged spring

Spring

22mm spring

Housing materials

When comparing the Gateron Everfree (EF) Cedar and the KTT MoonRosa, significant distinctions arise from their top housing materials, which greatly influence the sound profiles produced by each switch. The Everfree (EF) Cedar utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, renowned for its ability to generate a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound, primarily due to the material's stiffness. This clearer sound is amplified by the translucency of polycarbonate, making it particularly effective in gaming setups with RGB lighting, where the visual and audible effects can be harmoniously combined. In contrast, the MoonRosa's POM top housing delivers a sound profile that is distinctly deeper and more muted, reflecting the unique acoustic characteristics of POM plastics. Thus, while both switches provide engaging auditory experiences, the Everfree leans towards a brighter sound, while the MoonRosa offers a richer, more subdued tonality at the upper end.

The contrasting characteristics continue with the bottom housings of the two switches, where both utilize POM and nylon materials, respectively. The Everfree (EF) Cedar features a nylon bottom housing, which contributes to a fuller and deeper sound profile that absorbs more sound due to its softer plastic nature. This combination enhances the overall dullness and roundness of the auditory feedback when typing. Meanwhile, the MoonRosa, with its POM bottom housing, also produces a deep and pleasant sound; however, its muted quality may present a softer typing experience. Thus, the role of the bottom housing provides both switches with a deeper bass-like quality, albeit with slight variances in texture and resonance due to the inherent differences between nylon and POM materials.

Ultimately, when using the Everfree (EF) Cedar and the KTT MoonRosa, the combination of their respective housing materials leads to unique sound signatures. In scenarios where both the top and bottom housing materials differ, a switch's overall sound can reflect a blend of these characteristics. The nylon bottom housing of the Everfree generally produces a deeper bottom-out sound, while the stiff polycarbonate top enhances the let-off sound experience. Conversely, while the MoonRosa maintains a consistent deep quality throughout with its POM components, the interaction of its top and bottom housings will yield a smoother yet distinct acoustic profile. Consequently, achieving a similar auditory result between these switches might be possible by considering the materials in tandem, though the specific sound experience will vary based on their combinations.

Weight

When comparing the Gateron Everfree (EF) Cedar linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch, there are notable differences in their actuation forces that can influence user experience. The Everfree Cedar requires an actuation force of 55 grams, making it heavier, while the MoonRosa is lighter at just 37 grams. This difference means that users who favor a more substantial typing experience may prefer the Everfree switch, as its higher actuation force can provide a more tactile push. In contrast, those looking for a lighter feel, which can facilitate longer typing sessions or extended gaming, would benefit from the MoonRosa switch. The bottom out force for the Everfree Cedar is currently unknown, while the MoonRosa has a bottom out force of 45 grams. This contrast suggests that the MoonRosa delivers a fixed push feeling at the bottom, whereas the Cedar's undefined bottom out force may leave some uncertainty regarding its overall resistance when fully pressed down. Overall, the Everfree Cedar is the heavier option, while the MoonRosa offers a lighter alternative for those seeking ease of use.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the Gateron Everfree (EF) Cedar linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch, we see that the Everfree Cedar has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the MoonRosa features a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. This means that if you're looking for a more responsive keypress, the MoonRosa may be the better option due to its shorter distance. However, for users who prefer a more substantial feel in their key presses, the Everfree Cedar provides that added depth with its longer travel distance. Overall, while both switches cater to different preferences in tactile feedback and response time, the Everfree Cedar offers a longer travel experience than the KTT MoonRosa.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron Everfree (EF) Cedar has an MSRP of $2.99 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Everfree (EF) Cedar for $2.75.

The KTT MoonRosa comes in at $4.88 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Gateron Everfree (EF) Cedar switch is recognized for its satisfying, poppy sound profile, which adds a certain liveliness to the typing experience. This engaging auditory feedback makes it an enjoyable choice for many users. In contrast, the KTT MoonRosa switch produces a low-pitched signature that tends to be more mellow and bass-heavy. This neutral sound is less intrusive, making it suitable for environments where quieter operation is preferred. While the Everfree switch delivers a more pronounced auditory feedback, the MoonRosa's softer sound can create a more subdued typing ambiance. Ultimately, both switches offer distinct auditory characteristics that cater to different preferences.

In terms of feel, the Everfree (EF) Cedar switches are known for their smooth and reliable performance, providing a comfortable tactile experience that many users appreciate. However, specific details about its feel are somewhat vague. On the other hand, the KTT MoonRosa switch offers a more mild typing experience, characterized by gentle resistance and requiring minimal force to activate. This low-impact feel reduces finger fatigue, making these switches particularly appealing for extended typing sessions. The combination of a mild nature and easy actuation in the MoonRosa creates an approachable typing experience that is likely to resonate with a wide range of users.

In conclusion, both the Gateron Everfree (EF) Cedar and KTT MoonRosa switches offer unique qualities that cater to different typing preferences. The Everfree switch's poppy sound and smoothness provide a lively experience, while the MoonRosa's low-pitched, neutral sound combined with its easy-to-press feel promotes a gentler typing experience. Whether you prioritize auditory feedback or ease of use, both switches are designed to deliver a satisfying performance with their own distinct characteristics, allowing you to choose based on your preference for sound and tactile feedback.

Conclusion

To conclude, choosing between the Gateron Everfree (EF) Cedar linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch ultimately hinges on your typing preferences and requirements. If you're looking for a cost-effective switch that provides smooth, reliable performance with a satisfying, poppy sound profile, the Everfree (EF) Cedar is an excellent choice. This switch excels in delivering a comfortable typing experience that accommodates a wide range of users, making it ideal if you're new to mechanical keyboards or seek a straightforward solution. On the other hand, if you prioritize a buttery smooth typing experience and don’t mind a slightly heavier bottom-out force, the KTT MoonRosa is well-suited for you. Its all-POM construction and mild feel provide an approachable typing experience that is gentle on your fingers, making it a fantastic option for extended typing sessions. Additionally, its low-pitched sound signature may appeal to those who prefer a more mellow auditory feedback. Ultimately, your decision should reflect your personal comfort and sound preferences, ensuring that your choice enhances your overall typing experience.

Mentioned in this article