Gateron EverFree (EF) Curry vs. KTT MoonRosa
An in-depth look at the Gateron EverFree (EF) Curry and the KTT MoonRosa switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Gateron EverFree (EF) Curry and the KTT MoonRosa are both popular linear options to explore. The EverFree Curry stands out as a budget-friendly choice within the linear switch market, boasting a smooth keystroke and Gateron's trusted quality. On the other hand, the MoonRosa offers a buttery smooth typing experience with its all-POM construction and gentle sound profile. While the EverFree Curry is known for its snappy and polished feel, the MoonRosa is praised for being easy to press and low-pitched. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated
Spring
22mm spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Gateron EverFree (EF) Curry and the KTT MoonRosa, it is evident that both switches offer unique sound profiles based on their respective materials. The EverFree (EF) Curry utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. On the other hand, the MoonRosa's POM top housing creates a deeper and more muted sound. While both materials offer distinct auditory experiences, the polycarbonate in the EF Curry provides a more resonant and clear sound compared to the POM used in the MoonRosa.
Moving on to the bottom housing of these switches, the EverFree (EF) Curry features a nylon bottom housing, known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic composition. Conversely, the MoonRosa's POM bottom housing also delivers a deep and muted sound profile. Despite their differences in material, both switches offer a similar typing experience in terms of sound. While the nylon bottom housing in the Curry may absorb more sound than the POM bottom in the MoonRosa, both materials contribute to a rounder and duller sound compared to their top housings.
Overall, the combination of top and bottom housing materials plays a crucial role in the overall sound profile and feel of a switch. In switches where the materials differ between the top and bottom housing, users will experience varied impacts on sound and feel when typing. While the bottom housing influences the bottom-out sound and feel, the top housing has more influence on the sound when releasing a key. Despite these differences, both the EF Curry and MoonRosa offer pleasing and unique typing experiences, showcasing the versatility of various housing materials in mechanical switches.
Weight
In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gateron EverFree (EF) Curry linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch, we find that the MoonRosa is lighter while the EverFree is heavier. The EverFree has an actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 60 grams, providing a medium level of resistance. On the other hand, the MoonRosa features a lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, offering a lighter typing experience. Those who prefer a more substantial typing feel may lean towards the EverFree, while those looking for a lighter touch may opt for the MoonRosa. Both switches provide unique typing experiences based on their different force levels, catering to the preferences of different users.
Travel distance
The Gateron EverFree (EF) Curry linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the KTT MoonRosa linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm. In this case, the MoonRosa has the shorter travel distance, making it slightly more responsive compared to the EverFree Curry. Gamers may find the MoonRosa more suitable for faster response times in gaming scenarios. However, those who prefer a more substantial keypress feel may lean towards the EverFree Curry with its slightly longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches comes down to personal preference in terms of keypress feel and response time.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron EverFree (EF) Curry has an MSRP of $2.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the EverFree (EF) Curry for $1.99.
The KTT MoonRosa comes in at $4.88 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the EverFree (EF) Curry and the KTT MoonRosa switches offer different experiences. The EverFree (EF) Curry's sound profile is not explicitly described in the provided information, suggesting it may have a standard or neutral sound signature. On the other hand, the MoonRosa switch is known for its low-pitched sound, which offers a more bass-heavy and mellow tone compared to higher-pitched switches. Depending on personal preference, users may enjoy the smoother, neutral sound of the EF Curry or the distinct low-pitched sound of the MoonRosa.
In terms of feel, both the EverFree (EF) Curry and the MoonRosa switches provide a gentle typing experience. The EF Curry is described as snappy, polished, and mild, offering a responsive keystroke with smooth and refined key travel. These qualities make it a versatile choice suitable for various typing preferences. Similarly, the MoonRosa is also described as mild and easy-to-press, providing gentle resistance during key presses with minimal force required to activate the switch. This light actuation force enhances typing comfort and reduces finger fatigue during long typing sessions. Overall, both switches offer a pleasant and approachable typing feel.
In conclusion, the Gateron EverFree (EF) Curry and the KTT MoonRosa linear switches cater to different preferences within the mechanical keyboard community. The EF Curry is a budget-friendly option from a trusted manufacturer, offering a smooth and reliable keystroke experience with potentially neutral sound characteristics. On the other hand, the MoonRosa switch stands out for its all-POM construction, providing a buttery smooth typing feel with a distinctive low-pitched sound profile. Depending on whether one values a snappier keystroke or a softer feel, either switch can offer a satisfying typing experience. Ultimately, both switches provide quality options in the linear switch market, ensuring that users can achieve similar results in terms of reliability and comfort, each with its unique sound and feel qualities.
Conclusion
To sum up, when choosing between the Gateron EverFree (EF) Curry linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch, consider your preference for bottom out force. If you prefer a medium bottom out force of 60 grams, the EverFree (EF) Curry switch is a great choice, offering a budget-friendly option with Gateron's trusted quality. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force of 45 grams and value a buttery smooth typing experience with a neutral sound signature, the KTT MoonRosa switch would be more suitable for you. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences, so choose based on your desired typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
