United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron EverFree (EF) Grayish vs. Invyr Holy Panda

An in-depth look at the Gateron EverFree (EF) Grayish and the Invyr Holy Panda switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Gateron EverFree (EF) Grayish and the Invyr Holy Panda are two popular options to weigh against each other. The EF Grayish switch, known for its medium weight, neutral sound signature, and reasonable price point, is a solid choice for those seeking a default tactile option. On the other hand, the Holy Panda switch stands out for its sharp tactility and satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke, making it a favorite amongst tactile switch enthusiasts. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

59g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

N/A

Bottom-out force

67g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Double-staged spring

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

In comparing the housing materials of the Gateron EverFree (EF) Grayish and the Invyr Holy Panda, it is evident that both switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housing. Polycarbonate is known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness. This material is especially useful for switches that feature RGB lighting, as its translucency allows for a more aesthetically pleasing look when illuminated. The similarities in top housing material suggest that users can expect a comparable sound experience from both switches.

However, where the two switches differ is in their bottom housing material. The EverFree (EF) Grayish uses nylon for its bottom housing, which results in a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon is softer than polycarbonate, absorbing more sound and creating a rounder, duller sound. In contrast, the Holy Panda also utilizes nylon for its bottom housing, ensuring a similar experience in terms of sound depth and resonance. This commonality in bottom housing materials signifies that both switches may offer a comparable typing experience in terms of sound feedback.

When considering the impact of the housing materials on the overall sound and feel of the switches, it is essential to recognize the role of each component. The bottom housing of a switch, whether polycarbonate or nylon, influences the bottom-out sound and feel when a key is pressed. On the other hand, the top housing, which is consistent in both the EverFree (EF) Grayish and the Holy Panda, affects the sound when a key is released. By understanding the significance of each housing material in different aspects of the typing experience, users can make informed decisions based on their preferences for sound profile and tactile feedback.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gateron EverFree (EF) Grayish tactile switch and the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch, we see that the EverFree (EF) Grayish has a lighter actuation force of 59 grams, while the Holy Panda's actuation force is unknown. On the other hand, the Holy Panda has a heavier bottom out force of 67 grams, whereas the bottom out force for the EverFree (EF) Grayish is unknown. For those who prefer a lighter touch for longer typing sessions or gaming, the EverFree (EF) Grayish would be a suitable choice. In contrast, for individuals who enjoy a more robust typing experience with a stronger push feel, the Invyr Holy Panda would be the better option. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches would depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.

Travel distance

Comparing the travel distance of the Gateron EverFree (EF) Grayish tactile switch and the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch, it is clear that the Holy Panda has a longer travel distance at 4 mm compared to the EverFree Grayish's 3.4 mm. The Holy Panda is more traditional in this aspect, providing a deeper press experience. On the other hand, the EverFree Grayish offers a shorter travel distance, which may be preferred by gamers looking for a faster response time. Both switches have their own advantages; the Holy Panda for those who prefer a deeper press and the EverFree Grayish for those seeking faster responsiveness. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference and the type of typing or gaming experience desired.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron EverFree (EF) Grayish has an MSRP of $2.99 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the EverFree (EF) Grayish for $2.69.

The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the EverFree (EF) Grayish switch offers a neutral experience, with a moderate actuation force requirement and sound profile suitable for various purposes. On the other hand, the Holy Panda switch is renowned for its bright "clack" sound, providing a sharp tactile feedback with each keystroke. While both switches may produce different sound profiles, the overall sound experience can be influenced by factors such as keyboard construction and keycap material.

Moving on to feel, the EverFree (EF) Grayish switch is characterized as stepped and snappy, offering a mild yet responsive typing experience with distinct pre- and post-travel sensations. In contrast, the Holy Panda switch is described as accented, invigorating, sharp, and snappy, providing a pronounced and immersive tactile feedback with each keypress. While the EverFree (EF) Grayish switch offers a more moderate tactile feel, the Holy Panda switch stands out for its intense and sharp tactile bump, creating a dynamic typing sensation.

In conclusion, the Gateron EverFree (EF) Grayish and Invyr Holy Panda switches each offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. The EverFree (EF) Grayish switch provides a neutral sound profile and a stepped, snappy tactile feel, making it a versatile option for general use. On the other hand, the Holy Panda switch is known for its bright "clack" sound signature and an accented, invigorating, sharp, and snappy tactile feel, appealing to enthusiasts seeking a vibrant typing experience. Ultimately, choosing between these switches will depend on personal preference for sound, feel, and typing style.

Conclusion

In summary, when deciding between the Gateron EverFree (EF) Grayish tactile switch and the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch, you should consider your preferences in terms of bottom out force, sound, and feel. If you prefer a medium weight switch with a neutral sound profile and an affordable price point, the EverFree Grayish may be the ideal option for you. On the other hand, if you seek a highly tactile switch with pronounced feedback, a bright "clack" sound, and a more lively typing experience, the Holy Panda could be the perfect choice. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal typing style and what features are most important to you in a mechanical keyboard switch.

Mentioned in this article