United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT F2 vs. Invyr Holy Panda

An in-depth look at the KTT F2 and the Invyr Holy Panda switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT F2 and Invyr Holy Panda stand out as two distinct options. The KTT F2 is a linear switch known for its hollow sound signature and medium-light weight, offering a comfortable typing experience with a lightly textured feel. On the other hand, the Invyr Holy Panda is a tactile switch celebrated for its sharp tactility and satisfyingly bright clack with each keystroke. While the F2 is categorized as feathery, mild, neutral, subdued, and subtle, the Holy Panda falls under accented, invigorating, sharp, and snappy. Each switch has its own unique characteristics that may appeal to different preferences in typing experience. However, let's dive a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

67g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the KTT F2 and the Invyr Holy Panda, both switches use polycarbonate for their top housing. This material creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness, providing a clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that plan to use RGB lighting. However, the F2 also utilizes polycarbonate for its bottom housing, while the Holy Panda uses nylon. The nylon bottom housing of the Holy Panda produces a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the F2's polycarbonate bottom housing, as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound.

In terms of typing experience, the F2's bottom housing will have a stronger influence on the bottom-out sound and feel when the key is pressed, due to the qualities of polycarbonate. Conversely, the top housing of both switches, being polycarbonate, will impact the sound when releasing a key. This means that the overall typing experience may differ slightly between the two switches, with the F2 potentially offering a crisper and sharper sound profile overall, while the Holy Panda may provide a deeper and fuller typing sound due to the nylon bottom housing.

Ultimately, while both switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, the difference lies in the bottom housing material. The F2 with polycarbonate bottom housing will deliver a sharper and clearer sound profile, while the Holy Panda with nylon bottom housing will offer a deeper and fuller sound. Depending on personal preference for sound and typing feel, users can choose between the two switches to achieve their desired mechanical keyboard experience.

Weight

When comparing the KTT F2 linear switch to the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch in terms of actuation force and bottom out force, it is evident that the F2 is lighter while the Holy Panda is heavier. The F2 has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, providing a medium-light feel. In contrast, the Holy Panda has an actuation force that is unknown and a bottom out force of 67 grams, offering a medium-heavy typing experience. Those who prefer a lighter touch may appreciate the F2 for its lower actuation and bottom out forces, allowing for extended typing sessions without fatigue. On the other hand, individuals who prefer a more substantial typing experience may be drawn to the Holy Panda for its heavier bottom out force, providing a stronger push feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for typing feel and desired force feedback.

Travel distance

The KTT F2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, making it slightly shorter than the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch, which has a travel distance of 4 mm. Both of these distances fall within the range of traditional travel distances for switches. Gamers may prefer the shorter travel distance of the F2 for quicker response times, while those who enjoy a more tactile feel may opt for the longer travel distance of the Holy Panda. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and typing experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.

The KTT F2 comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the KTT F2 switch offers a unique hollow sound signature that sets it apart in the mechanical keyboard community. This sound profile is described as neutral or subdued, making it suitable for various environments and preferences. On the other hand, the Invyr Holy Panda switch is known for producing a satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke, showcasing a blend of pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance. While the F2 leans towards a more subtle sound experience, the Holy Panda brings a more distinct auditory presence that appeals to tactile switch enthusiasts.

Moving on to the feel of these switches, the KTT F2 switch provides a feathery and subtle typing experience with a lightly textured feel on each keystroke. This light actuation force reduces finger fatigue, making it comfortable for extended typing sessions. In contrast, the Invyr Holy Panda switch offers an invigorating and sharp tactile sensation, characterized by a prominent tactile bump that is not overwhelming but still provides a satisfying feedback. The Holy Panda's snappy and reactive feel adds an immersive element to the typing experience, further solidifying its place as a beloved tactile switch option.

Overall, the KTT F2 and Invyr Holy Panda switches offer distinct qualities in both sound and feel. While the F2 emphasizes a comfortable and lightly textured typing experience with a unique hollow sound, the Holy Panda delivers a satisfyingly bright auditory profile paired with a sharp tactile feedback. Depending on personal preferences for sound and feel, either switch can provide a rewarding typing experience. Ultimately, both switches cater to different needs and desires, ensuring that users will receive similar levels of quality and performance based on their individual preferences.

Conclusion

To sum up, when choosing between the KTT F2 linear switch and the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch, consider the following guidelines. If you value a comfortable typing experience with a medium-light bottom out force and a lightly textured feel, opt for the KTT F2. The distinct hollow sound signature of the F2 adds a unique auditory dimension to your typing. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with sharp tactility, pronounced feedback, and a medium-heavy bottom out force, the Invyr Holy Panda is the way to go. The satisfyingly bright "clack" of each keystroke and unmatched blend of feedback and resonance make the Holy Panda a beloved choice among tactile switch enthusiasts. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for typing experience, sound profile, and feedback intensity. Choose the switch that best aligns with your specific needs and enjoy a satisfying mechanical keyboard experience.

Mentioned in this article