United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT F2 vs. KTT Mallo

An in-depth look at the KTT F2 and the KTT Mallo switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT F2 and the KTT Mallo are both excellent options to consider. The F2 switch stands out for its distinct hollow sound signature and lightly textured feel, providing a unique typing experience that strikes a balance between comfort and tactile feedback. On the other hand, the Mallo switch is known for its subtle tactility and medium-light typing feel, making it a versatile choice for different typing environments. While the F2 offers a more pronounced auditory experience, the Mallo excels in providing just enough feedback without being overpowering. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities to help you decide on the best switch for your needs.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

55g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

No

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

The KTT F2 and Mallo both feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to polycarbonate being a relatively stiff plastic, resulting in a clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. However, the F2 differs from the Mallo in terms of their bottom housings. The F2 has a polycarbonate bottom housing, while the Mallo features a nylon bottom housing. The nylon bottom housing of the Mallo produces a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the F2, as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound.

In terms of sound profile, the top and bottom housing materials of the KTT F2 and Mallo play a significant role. The bottom housing material affects the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch when pressed, with the nylon bottom housing of the Mallo creating a deeper and fuller sound compared to the polycarbonate bottom housing of the F2. On the other hand, the top housing material has a greater impact on the sound when a key is released. Both switches utilize polycarbonate top housings, which contribute to a sharper and crisper sound profile, especially when combined with RGB lighting. However, the use of different bottom housing materials results in distinct sound characteristics between the two switches.

Overall, the housing materials of the KTT F2 and Mallo contribute to their unique sound profiles and tactile feedback. While both switches feature polycarbonate top housings that enhance the overall sound quality with their stiffness and translucency, they differ in terms of their bottom housings. The nylon bottom housing of the Mallo creates a deeper and fuller sound profile, while the polycarbonate bottom housing of the F2 provides a clearer and more resonant sound. Understanding the impact of housing materials on switch performance can help individuals choose the switch that best suits their preferences for sound and feel.

Weight

The KTT F2 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch both fall into the medium-light category when it comes to actuation and bottom out forces. The F2 has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, while the Mallo has an actuation force of unknown grams and a bottom out force of 55 grams. Both switches are relatively lighter compared to heavier options on the market. Those who prefer a lighter touch for extended typing or gaming sessions may appreciate the F2 or Mallo switches. However, individuals who enjoy a more substantial typing experience may lean towards options with heavier actuation and bottom out forces. Overall, the F2 is slightly lighter in terms of actuation force, while the Mallo is slightly heavier in terms of bottom out force. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for typing feel and force requirements.

Travel distance

The KTT F2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the KTT Mallo tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. This makes the Mallo the longer of the two switches. The difference of 0.5 mm may not seem significant, but for those who prefer a deeper key press, the Mallo may be the better option. On the other hand, the shorter travel distance of the F2 may be more appealing to gamers or those who value faster response times. Both switches offer a different feel and response due to their travel distances, so it ultimately depends on personal preference and typing style.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.

The KTT F2 comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, both the KTT F2 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch are described as having a neutral sound profile, suitable for a variety of environments. The F2 offers a distinct hollow sound signature, adding character to each keystroke, while the Mallo provides a more subdued sound that is gentle on the ears. Ultimately, the sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors like the keyboard and keycaps being used.

In terms of feel, both switches offer a comfortable typing experience with medium-light actuation. The F2 is described as feathery and mild, providing a light touch that reduces finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. On the other hand, the Mallo is also feathery and mild, but adds a subtle tactile feedback for those who prefer a slightly more pronounced typing experience. Both switches strike a balanced middle ground in terms of feel, making them versatile options for various typing needs.

Overall, the KTT F2 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch both offer unique characteristics in terms of sound and feel. The F2 stands out with its hollow sound signature and lightly textured feel, while the Mallo excels in providing subtle tactility and a gentle typing experience. Whether you choose the F2 for its distinct sound or the Mallo for its finesse, you can expect a comfortable and versatile typing experience with either switch.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the KTT F2 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch, consider the following guidelines. If you prioritize a distinct hollow sound signature with a lightly textured feel for each keystroke, the F2 would be an excellent choice for you. The medium-light weightiness of the F2 ensures a comfortable typing experience without being too forceful or fleeting. On the other hand, if you prefer a gentle tactility that provides just enough feedback without being overpowering, the Mallo switch would be more suitable for your typing needs. The balanced combination of medium-light typing feel and neutral sound signature makes the Mallo versatile for various typing environments. Ultimately, your decision should be based on whether you value the nuanced sound signature and textured feel of the F2 or the subtle tactility and versatile nature of the Mallo.

Mentioned in this article