KTT F2 vs. Cherry MX Speed Silver
An in-depth look at the KTT F2 and the Cherry MX Speed Silver switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options that stand out are the KTT F2 and the Cherry MX Speed Silver, both of which fall under the category of linear switches. The KTT F2 switches are renowned for their distinct hollow sound signature, providing a unique auditory experience while typing. With a medium-light weightiness and lightly textured feel, these switches offer a comfortable and tactile typing experience. On the other hand, the Cherry MX Speed Silver is all about speed, featuring low spring resistance and linear action for rapid response times, making it ideal for gamers looking to gain a competitive edge. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
1.20 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the KTT F2 and the Cherry MX Speed Silver, it is clear that they both prioritize sound profiles but achieve this in different ways. The F2's polycarbonate top and bottom housings create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to the stiffness of the material. On the other hand, the MX Speed Silver's nylon top and bottom housings elicit a deeper and fuller sound profile as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound. This results in a more rounded sound compared to the sharper sound produced by polycarbonate. Despite these differences, both switches aim to enhance the overall typing experience through their housing materials, catering to different sound preferences.
In terms of aesthetics, the F2's polycarbonate housing is translucent, making it ideal for switches that plan to utilize RGB lighting. The clear nature of polycarbonate allows for the lighting effects to shine through, creating a visually appealing keyboard setup. On the other hand, the MX Speed Silver's nylon housing may not offer the same level of transparency but emphasizes a classic and timeless look. While both housing materials serve practical purposes in enhancing sound profiles, their visual appeal also plays a significant role in the overall design of the keyboard.
When considering the impact of the top and bottom housing materials on the typing experience, it is important to note how they influence the sound profile during key presses. The bottom housing material will impact the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing material will have a more pronounced effect on the sound when releasing a key. By understanding how these materials work in tandem, keyboard enthusiasts can better appreciate the nuances in typing experience that each switch offers. Whether it is the sharper sound of polycarbonate in the F2 or the fuller sound of nylon in the MX Speed Silver, the housing materials play a vital role in shaping the overall typing experience.
Weight
The KTT F2 linear switch has a slightly heavier actuation force of 43 grams compared to the Cherry MX Speed Silver's lighter 30 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the F2 requires 53 grams, while the MX Speed Silver's bottom out force is unknown. For those who prefer a lighter key press, the MX Speed Silver may be the better option, allowing for longer typing or gaming sessions without fatigue. On the other hand, the slightly heavier F2 switch may provide a more substantial typing experience for those who prefer a stronger push feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The travel distance of the KTT F2 linear switch is 3.5 mm, while the Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, making them popular choices for those seeking faster response times, such as gamers. The difference of 0.1 mm between the two may not be noticeable to some users, but those who are more sensitive to slight changes in key feel may prefer the Cherry MX Speed Silver for its slightly shorter travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for key feel and response time.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Cherry MX Speed Silver has an MSRP of $5.90 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the MX Speed Silver for $4.00.
The KTT F2 comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT F2 linear switch offers a neutral and subdued sound profile, providing a comfortable typing experience suitable for a variety of users and environments. On the other hand, the Cherry MX Speed Silver switch produces a thocky and low-pitched sound, which adds a satisfying auditory feedback especially favored by gamers. Both switches provide distinct sound qualities that can enhance the overall typing experience depending on personal preference and the surrounding environment.
In terms of feel, the KTT F2 switch delivers a feathery and mild typing experience with a subtle tactile feedback, promoting extended typing sessions with reduced finger fatigue. Conversely, the Cherry MX Speed Silver switch is described as textured, which may provide a different feel during typing, depending on individual preference. While the F2 switch offers a gentle resistance and a light typing feel, the MX Speed Silver switch may offer more noticeable friction when pressed, catering to users who prefer a textured experience.
Overall, the KTT F2 linear switch is characterized by a comfortable typing experience with a distinct hollow sound signature and lightly textured feel. On the other hand, the Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch stands out for its rapid response time, full height for maximum speed, and thocky sound profile. Depending on whether you prioritize sound, feel, or speed in your typing experience, both switches offer unique qualities that can cater to different preferences and requirements. Ultimately, experimenting with both switches on a variety of keyboards and keycaps will help determine which one suits your needs best.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the KTT F2 linear switch and the Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch, you should consider your priorities and preferences. If you value a distinct sound signature with a lightly textured feel and medium-light actuation force, the KTT F2 would be an excellent choice for a comfortable typing experience suitable for various settings. On the other hand, if you prioritize speed and instant responsiveness with a low spring resistance for gaming or fast-paced tasks, the Cherry MX Speed Silver switch would be ideal for maximizing your performance. Ultimately, your decision should be based on whether you prefer the unique characteristics of the F2 or the rapid response of the Speed Silver to best suit your typing or gaming needs. Consider these factors to make an informed choice that aligns with your typing style and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
