KTT F2 vs. Haimu Neo White
An in-depth look at the KTT F2 and the Haimu Neo White switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT F2 and Haimu Neo White both offer unique benefits for users to consider. The KTT F2 is known for its distinct hollow sound signature and medium-light weightiness, providing a comfortable typing experience with a lightly textured feel. On the other hand, the Haimu Neo White stands out with its medium weight and reduced total travel, offering a smooth and satisfying typing experience with a rare Ly stem for smooth actuation. While the F2 leans towards a feathery and subtle typing experience, the Neo White offers a mild and neutral feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
Ly
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Double-staged spring
Housing materials
The KTT F2 and the Haimu Neo White both feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to polycarbonate being a relatively stiffer plastic, resulting in a more clear and resonant sound. Aesthetically, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. However, when it comes to the bottom housings, the F2 uses polycarbonate while the Neo White uses nylon. The nylon bottom housing of the Neo White produces a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the F2's polycarbonate bottom housing, as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, creating a rounder sound.
In terms of functionality, the differences between the polycarbonate top housing of the F2 and Neo White have more impact on the sound when letting go of a key, while the bottom housing materials play a larger role in the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on the switch. The stiffer polycarbonate material of the F2's bottom housing may result in a more clear and resonant sound during key presses, whereas the softer nylon of the Neo White could provide a more dampened and rounded sound. This contrast in housing materials exemplifies how the material choice can significantly affect the overall sound profile and typing experience of a keyboard switch.
Although the F2 and Neo White share similarities in their polycarbonate top housings, the difference in bottom housing materials - polycarbonate for the F2 and nylon for the Neo White - will lead to distinct typing experiences. While both switches offer the benefits of polycarbonate top housings in terms of sharp, crisp sound profiles and potential for RGB lighting effects, the choice of bottom housing material will influence the overall sound profile and tactile experience. Understanding these differences can help users make informed decisions based on their preferences for sound, feel, and aesthetics when selecting between these two keyboard switches.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT F2 linear switch and the Haimu Neo White linear switch, it is evident that there are some differences between the two. The F2 has a lighter actuation force of 43 grams compared to the Neo White, which has an unknown actuation force. However, the Neo White has a heavier bottom out force of 58 grams, whereas the F2 has a bottom out force of 53 grams. Despite their differences, both switches fall into the medium spectrum in terms of force required. Some users may prefer the lighter actuation force of the F2 for extended typing or gaming sessions, while others may appreciate the stronger push feel of the Neo White for a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches would depend on individual preferences for typing feel and force requirements.
Travel distance
The KTT F2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Haimu Neo White linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, making them suitable for gamers looking for faster response times. However, the Neo White has a slightly longer travel distance, which may provide a slightly more substantial feeling when pressing down on the key compared to the F2. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches may come down to personal preference in terms of how much depth and feedback you prefer in your keystrokes. Whether you choose the shorter F2 or the slightly longer Neo White, both switches will offer a relatively quick and responsive typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the KTT F2 comes in at $3.90, whereas the Haimu Neo White comes in at $2.70.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, both the KTT F2 and the Haimu Neo White switches have a neutral sound profile, making them suitable for various settings and users, whether beginners or advanced typists. The F2 switches have a slightly subdued sound signature, offering a more muted noise compared to most switches, while the Neo White switches provide a standard level of sound. Keep in mind that the sound produced by a switch is also influenced by other factors such as the keyboard's construction and keycaps.
When it comes to feel, the KTT F2 switches are noted for their feathery, mild, and subtle qualities, offering a light and comfortable typing experience with a textured feel to each keystroke. On the other hand, the Haimu Neo White switches provide a milder typing experience, falling within a safe, middle-ground zone in terms of sound and feel. The Neo White switches also feature a smooth actuation due to the rare use of a Ly stem, making each keystroke satisfyingly smooth.
Overall, both the KTT F2 and Haimu Neo White switches offer distinct characteristics that cater to different preferences. While the F2 switches provide a slightly more textured and nuanced typing experience with a subdued sound, the Neo White switches offer a smoother actuation and a standard typing feel. Depending on personal preference for sound and feel, users can expect a comfortable typing experience with either switch, ultimately achieving similar results in terms of performance and satisfaction.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the KTT F2 linear switch and the Haimu Neo White linear switch, consider the bottom out force and unique characteristics of each switch. If you prefer a medium-light bottom out force and enjoy a distinct hollow sound signature with lightly textured keystrokes, the F2 may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly heavier bottom out force with a smooth actuation and reduced total travel distance, the Neo White switch might be more to your liking. Both switches offer a comfortable typing experience with moderate sound profiles, making them suitable for various purposes. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences and typing style.
Mentioned in this article
