KTT F2 vs. Outemu Dustproof Blue
An in-depth look at the KTT F2 and the Outemu Dustproof Blue switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the KTT F2 linear switch to the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch, each offers unique features that cater to different preferences. The F2 stands out for its distinct hollow sound signature, making it ideal for those who enjoy a more auditory typing experience. With a medium-light weightiness and lightly textured feel, the F2 provides a comfortable and tactile typing experience. On the other hand, the Dustproof Blue switch doesn't have a specific standout feature but is known for its clicky feedback. While the F2 is categorized as feathery, mild, neutral, subdued, and subtle, the Dustproof Blue's characteristics are not specifically stated. Both switches have their own strengths and appeal to different typing preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
50g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
65g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.20 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the KTT F2 and the Outemu Dustproof Blue, both switches utilize polycarbonate for the top housing, providing a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which enhances resonance. Additionally, the translucent nature of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches intended for RGB lighting. However, where they differ is in the bottom housing material. The F2 features a polycarbonate bottom housing, continuing the trend of a clear and resonant sound profile, while the Dustproof Blue incorporates a nylon bottom housing.
The nylon bottom housing of the Dustproof Blue offers a different typing experience compared to the F2's polycarbonate bottom housing. Nylon is known for providing a deeper and fuller sound profile, as it is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. This contrast in bottom housing materials can significantly impact the overall typing feel and sound of the switches. While both switches prioritize sound quality, the use of different materials in the bottom housing showcases the diversity in options available to keyboard enthusiasts seeking a specific typing experience.
Ultimately, the choice between the KTT F2 and the Outemu Dustproof Blue will come down to personal preference in sound and typing feel. The polycarbonate top housing in both switches maintains a similar sound profile, while the differences in bottom housing materials can lead to distinct typing experiences. Whether one prefers the sharper tones of polycarbonate or the deeper sound of nylon, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to individual preferences. Furthermore, understanding how each housing material affects the sound profile can help users make an informed decision based on their desired typing experience.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT F2 linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch, it is evident that the F2 is lighter in both aspects. The F2 has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, making it a medium-light switch. On the other hand, the Dustproof Blue switch has a higher actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 65 grams, placing it in the medium-heavy category. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may opt for the F2 switch, as it requires less force to actuate and bottom out. In contrast, individuals seeking a more substantial typing feel may lean towards the Dustproof Blue switch with its heavier actuation and bottom out forces. Overall, the lighter actuation force of the F2 provides a smoother typing experience for those who prefer a lighter touch, while the Dustproof Blue switch offers a more deliberate and tactile typing experience due to its heavier forces.
Travel distance
The KTT F2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, which is shorter than the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch with a travel distance of 4 mm. The F2 offers a quicker response time due to its shorter travel distance, making it a preferred choice for gamers seeking faster keystrokes. On the other hand, the Dustproof Blue switch provides a more substantial keypress feel with its longer travel distance, appealing to those who prefer a more pronounced tactile feedback. Both switches have their own advantages based on personal preference, with the F2 being the shorter option for rapid responses, and the Dustproof Blue offering a longer travel distance for a more satisfying keystroke experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the KTT F2 comes in at $3.90, whereas the Outemu Dustproof Blue comes in at $3.10.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT F2 linear switch offers a unique and somewhat neutral sound profile with a moderate actuation force requirement, making it suitable for a wide range of users and environments. The Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch's sound profile, on the other hand, is unknown. It is important to note that the sound of a switch is not solely determined by the switch itself but is also influenced by other factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the KTT F2 linear switch provides a feathery and mild typing experience, offering a light actuation force that reduces finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. Additionally, the lightly textured feel of each keystroke adds a tactile nuance to the typing experience. As for the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch, its feel characteristics are also unknown. Both switches provide a comfortable typing experience by maintaining a light and approachable typing feel.
In conclusion, the KTT F2 linear switch stands out for its distinct hollow sound signature and comfortable typing experience, making it a versatile option for various users. While the sound and feel characteristics of the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch are unknown, it is important to consider personal preference and the overall typing experience when choosing between the two switches. Ultimately, both switches are likely to provide a similar level of satisfaction based on the available information.
Conclusion
In closing, when considering whether to choose the KTT F2 linear switch or the Outemu Dustproof Blue clicky switch, it ultimately comes down to your preference for typing experience. If you prefer a medium-light bottom out force with a distinct hollow sound and lightly textured feel, the F2 may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-heavy bottom out force with a clicky sound and a tactile feedback, the Dustproof Blue may suit your typing style better. Consider your preferences for bottom out force, sound profile, and typing feel to make the best decision for your mechanical keyboard setup. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different typing preferences, so choose wisely based on your personal preferences and typing habits.
Mentioned in this article
