United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT F2 vs. Outemu Spring Breeze

An in-depth look at the KTT F2 and the Outemu Spring Breeze switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the KTT F2 linear switch to the Outemu Spring Breeze clicky switch, each offers unique qualities that cater to specific preferences. The KTT F2 stands out for its distinct hollow sound signature and medium-light weightiness, creating a comfortable yet tactile typing experience. In contrast, the Outemu Spring Breeze lacks a distinctive characteristic but provides a different typing experience. The F2 is categorized as 'Feathery', 'Mild', 'Neutral', 'Subdued', 'Subtle', while the Spring Breeze does not have any specific categorization. Overall, these switches offer different auditory and tactile sensations, making them suitable for different typing styles. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

40g

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

55g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

1.50 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

pom

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

In comparing the housing materials of the KTT F2 and the Outemu Spring Breeze, it is clear that they have distinct differences in terms of sound profile and material properties. The F2's polycarbonate top housing provides a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness, resulting in a clear and resonant sound. On the other hand, the Spring Breeze's nylon top housing produces a deeper and fuller sound profile as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, creating a duller and rounder sound. While both materials offer unique sound characteristics, the polycarbonate top housing of the F2 will likely provide a more clear and sharp sound compared to the nylon top housing of the Spring Breeze.

Moving on to the bottom housings, the polycarbonate bottom housing of the F2 mirrors the characteristics of its top housing, offering a sharper and crisper sound profile. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, resulting in a clear and resonant sound when typing. Conversely, the nylon bottom housing of the Spring Breeze elicits a deeper and fuller sound profile, absorbing more sound due to its softer nature. The bottom housing material plays a significant role in the bottom-out sound and feel of a switch, with polycarbonate likely providing a more impactful and clear sound compared to nylon in this aspect.

Despite the differences in housing materials between the KTT F2 and the Outemu Spring Breeze, it is important to note that the qualities each material brings to the switch will be split between the top and bottom housings. The stiffness of polycarbonate in the F2's top and bottom housings will likely result in a consistent sharp and clear sound profile throughout typing. In contrast, the softer nature of nylon in the Spring Breeze's top and bottom housings may lead to a more muted and fuller sound experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on the sound profile that best suits the user's preferences.

Weight

The KTT F2 linear switch and the Outemu Spring Breeze clicky switch both fall into the medium-light weight category when it comes to actuation force and bottom out force. The F2 has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, while the Spring Breeze has an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 55 grams. Both switches offer a relatively light actuation force, making them suitable for extended typing or gaming sessions. However, the Spring Breeze requires a slightly heavier force for bottoming out compared to the F2. This slight difference may provide a slightly more substantial typing experience for those who prefer a bit more resistance in their keystrokes. In general, those who prefer a lighter feel may lean towards the F2, while those who prefer a slightly heavier push may opt for the Spring Breeze. Both switches offer a balance between actuation force and bottom out force, providing users with a comfortable and responsive typing experience.

Travel distance

The KTT F2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Outemu Spring Breeze clicky switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the Spring Breeze has a longer travel distance compared to the F2. The difference may not seem significant, but it can affect the overall feel and responsiveness of the keyboard. Gamers who prioritize faster response times may prefer the shorter travel distance of the F2, while those who enjoy a more hefty keypress may lean towards the longer travel distance of the Spring Breeze. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style. Both switches offer unique experiences, so it is important to consider which travel distance suits your needs best.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

For 10 switches, the KTT F2 comes in at $3.90, whereas the Outemu Spring Breeze comes in at $3.10.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the KTT F2 linear switch offers a distinctive hollow sound signature that sets it apart from other switches in the auditory realm. It is described as having a neutral or subdued sound profile, making it suitable for various purposes without being too loud or too quiet. On the other hand, the Outemu Spring Breeze clicky switch does not have a specified sound description. Sound perception is also influenced by factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.

When it comes to feel, the KTT F2 switch provides a lightly textured feel with a medium-light weightiness, offering a comfortable typing experience that is neither too forceful nor too light. This switch is described as feathery, mild, or subtle, providing a gentle resistance that reduces finger fatigue and makes it suitable for extended typing sessions in various settings. However, the Outemu Spring Breeze clicky switch does not have a specified feel description.

Overall, the KTT F2 linear switch excels in offering a unique hollow sound signature and a lightly textured feel, making it a versatile option for both typing and gaming purposes. While the specific sound and feel qualities of the Outemu Spring Breeze clicky switch are unknown, it is important to consider individual preferences and needs when choosing between these two switches. Ultimately, both switches are likely to provide similar results in terms of performance and functionality.

Conclusion

In closing, if you are looking for a switch that offers a unique sound signature with a comfortable typing experience, the KTT F2 linear switch is the way to go. The medium-light bottom out force, lightly textured feel, and distinct hollow sound make it a great choice for both work and gaming. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with a clicky feedback and a slightly higher bottom out force, the Outemu Spring Breeze clicky switch might be more up your alley. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your preferences for sound, feel, and typing experience. Choose wisely to ensure a satisfying typing journey ahead.

Mentioned in this article