United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT F2 vs. Bsun Tomcat

An in-depth look at the KTT F2 and the Bsun Tomcat switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to selecting the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT F2 and the Bsun Tomcat represent two compelling choices for linear switch enthusiasts, each with its unique characteristics. The KTT F2 is celebrated for its distinct hollow sound signature that creates a unique auditory experience, along with a medium-light weight that strikes a balance between comfort and responsiveness. Its lightly textured feel adds a layer of tactile nuance, making each keystroke satisfying without being overwhelming. Conversely, the Bsun Tomcat boasts an exceptionally smooth typing experience, thanks to its Ly stems, which allow for effortless keystrokes. While the Tomcat provides a resonant sound profile that elevates the overall typing ambiance, it may appeal more to those who prioritize seamlessness over texture. Ultimately, both switches cater to different preferences in typing feel and sound, yet it's essential to explore their features more closely to determine which could be the best fit for your unique needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

54g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

1.95 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

Ly

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

Extended spring

Housing materials

The KTT F2 and Bsun Tomcat both feature polycarbonate top housings, resulting in similar auditory characteristics. The use of polycarbonate in the top housing leads to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness. This material enhances the resonance of the switch, providing a clearer sound when a key is pressed and released. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it particularly advantageous for setups that prioritize RGB lighting, as it allows for vibrant illumination through the switch. This commonality in top housing materials implies that users can expect a consistent auditory experience, characterized by a bright and present sound signature when using either switch.

In contrast, the bottom housings of the KTT F2 and Bsun Tomcat diverge significantly, with the F2 utilizing polycarbonate and the Tomcat opting for nylon. While the F2’s polycarbonate bottom housing contributes to a similar clear and resonant sound profile as its top counterpart, the Tomcat's nylon bottom housing introduces a different auditory experience. Nylon, being a softer plastic, absorbs more sound waves, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile. This means that while both switches can offer a bright top-end sound due to their polycarbonate tops, the Bsun Tomcat’s nylon bottom will yield a rounder and more muted sound during typing sessions, impacting the overall feel of the key press and its bottom-out sound differently.

Ultimately, the differences in bottom housing materials largely define the tactile and auditory experience users will have with each switch. The KTT F2 will provide a more coherent sound signature in both the upstroke and downstroke due to its uniform polycarbonate materials, while the Bsun Tomcat will create a contrast between the sharpness of its polycarbonate top and the warmth of its nylon bottom. Therefore, users who prioritize a consistent auditory experience across the entire key press cycle may prefer the F2, while those seeking a fuller sound on bottoming out might find the Tomcat more appealing. The interaction of the materials plays a pivotal role in how each switch feels and sounds, showcasing the unique qualities brought by their respective housing choices.

Weight

The KTT F2 linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch offer a similar typing experience, each falling into the medium-light category, but with slight differences in their specifications. The F2 features an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, making it just a tad lighter than the Tomcat, which has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 54 grams. This means that while both switches provide a comfortable amount of resistance for typing and gaming, the F2 may be better suited for users who prefer a lighter feel for extended sessions, while the Tomcat might appeal to those who enjoy a slightly firmer push when typing. Overall, both switches offer comparable actuation and bottom out forces; however, the KTT F2 stands out as the lighter option.

Travel distance

When comparing the KTT F2 linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch, there is a slight difference in travel distance: the F2 has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Tomcat measures 3.6 mm. This means that the KTT F2 is the shorter of the two switches, offering a more responsive feel that may appeal to gamers looking for quicker response times. On the other hand, the Bsun Tomcat, with its longer 3.6 mm travel distance, provides a greater depth, potentially offering a more traditional typing experience for those who prefer a more deliberate keystroke. Both switches fall within a range that is shorter than the traditional 4.0 mm distance, catering to contemporary preferences for faster actuation while still delivering varied tactile feedback based on individual user preferences.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

For 10 switches, the KTT F2 comes in at $3.90, whereas the Bsun Tomcat comes in at $2.99.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the KTT F2 linear switch stands out with its distinct hollow sound signature that contributes a unique auditory experience to each keystroke. It navigates a moderate sound profile, often being characterized as neutral and subdued. This balanced sound makes it suitable for a variety of environments, whether at home or in the workplace. The F2's sound, while not silent, is comparatively less intrusive than many other types of switches. In contrast, while the Bsun Tomcat linear switch is noted for having a resonant sound profile, specific descriptors are not provided for its acoustic characteristics. Thus, while the F2 is more definitive in its sound attributes, the Tomcat’s qualities may not be as clearly defined.

In terms of feel, the KTT F2 switch offers a typing experience that can be classified as feathery and mild, allowing for effortless pressing with minimal strain on the fingers. This quality is ideal for prolonged use, making the F2 a strong contender for heavy typists. The switch provides a subtly textured feedback that enhances the tactile experience without being overly aggressive. On the other hand, the Bsun Tomcat's smoothness is emphasized through its Ly stems, which likely contributes to a different typing sensation that focuses on fluidity. However, the specific descriptors for the Tomcat’s feel are unavailable, making direct comparisons in this realm challenging.

In conclusion, the KTT F2 linear switch provides a well-rounded auditory profile and a comfortable, gentle typing experience, making it highly suitable for various settings. Meanwhile, the Bsun Tomcat linear switch, while noted for its smoothness, lacks specific details on sound and feel that would facilitate a thorough comparison. Ultimately, individuals seeking similar experiences in typing or sound quality should anticipate that the KTT F2 provides a more defined representation of these qualities. However, those considering the Tomcat may still find a unique experience depending on their personal preferences, even if the unique attributes remain somewhat ambiguous.

Conclusion

To conclude, choosing between the KTT F2 linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and how you plan to use your keyboard. If you appreciate a distinct auditory experience and prefer a typing feel that combines a lightweight action with a touch of texture, the KTT F2 is an excellent option. Its unique hollow sound signature and subtle feedback can enhance your typing experience, making it ideal for extended sessions at work or home without causing finger fatigue, thanks to its feathery touch. Conversely, if you prioritize a super smooth keystroke and a more resonant sound profile, the Bsun Tomcat may be the better choice for you. This switch’s focus on smoothness can provide a seamless typing experience, particularly beneficial if you engage in high-speed typing or gaming where fluidity is paramount. Thus, consider your usage scenarios and sound preferences to determine which switch aligns better with your needs.

Mentioned in this article