United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

TTC Flame Red vs. HMX Swift

An in-depth look at the TTC Flame Red and the HMX Swift switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the TTC Flame Red and the HMX Swift both offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences. The Flame Red is renowned for its visually appealing light diffuser, making it an ideal choice for those who prioritize aesthetics, especially on backlit RGB keyboards. Typing on Flame Red switches provides a weighty smoothness and a clacky sound profile, offering a tactile typing experience. On the other hand, the HMX Swift stands out for its deeper sound profile and silky smoothness, thanks to its full nylon housings. With a delicate 42g actuation force, the Swift switches provide an easy-to-press and bouncy typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

42g

Bottom-out force

54g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.90 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

Ly

Top housing material

Nylon

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

24.5mm long spring

Spring

22mm extended spring

Housing materials

The housing materials of the TTC Flame Red and the HMX Swift are both constructed with nylon, making them similar in terms of material composition. Nylon is known for its ability to produce a deep and full sound profile when typing on switches, as it is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound than harder plastics. This results in a duller and rounder sound that can enhance the overall typing experience for users of both switches.

However, where the Flame Red and Swift differ is in the design and implementation of their nylon top and bottom housings. The qualities of the housing material are split between the top and bottom of the switch, with the bottom housing having more of an impact on the bottom-out sound and feel when the switch is pressed down. On the other hand, the top housing will have more of an impact on the sound produced when a key is released. This distinction in housing design can lead to subtle differences in the typing experience between the two switches.

Overall, despite the slight variations in housing design, the use of nylon in both the Flame Red and Swift switches ultimately results in a similar sound profile and typing feel. The properties of nylon as a softer plastic that absorbs sound contribute to creating a satisfying and pleasant typing experience for users of both switches. Whether it be the Flame Red or the Swift, the nylon housing material ensures that typists can enjoy a deep and full sound profile that enhances their overall typing performance.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the TTC Flame Red linear switch and the HMX Swift linear switch, it is evident that the Flame Red requires a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams compared to the Swift's 42 grams, making the Swift the lighter option. In terms of bottom out force, the Flame Red again requires a heavier force of 54 grams compared to the Swift's 50 grams. Both switches provide a medium-light actuation force and a light bottom out force. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Swift switch, which has a slightly lower actuation and bottom out force. On the other hand, those who enjoy a more substantial typing feel may opt for the Flame Red switch with its slightly heavier forces. Overall, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference in terms of typing experience and force requirement.

Travel distance

The TTC Flame Red linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the HMX Swift linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.9 mm. Both switches fall within the range of traditional travel distances, with Flame Red being slightly longer. Gamers who prioritize faster response times may lean towards the Swift switch due to its shorter travel distance. On the other hand, individuals who prefer a more substantial keypress may find the Flame Red switch more satisfying. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference in terms of travel distance and keypress feel.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The TTC Flame Red has an MSRP of $7.29 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Flame Red for $4.38.

The HMX Swift has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Swift for $2.99.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the TTC Flame Red offers a neutral sound profile that caters well to a wide range of users, whether they are beginners or seasoned typists. On the other hand, the HMX Swift is known for its clacky sound, delivering a sharp and snappy auditory experience that can be described as crisp and bright. The difference in sound between the two switches is quite distinct, with the Flame Red leaning towards a more moderate and versatile sound, while the Swift provides a more percussive and striking sound. Ultimately, your choice of keyboard, keycaps, and personal preference will also play a role in the final sound output.

Moving on to feel, the TTC Flame Red switch offers a mild and polished typing experience, striking a balance between gentle key presses and a refined finish that enhances the overall typing feel. In contrast, the HMX Swift switch is characterized as easy-to-press, feathery, bouncy, and creamy, providing a light actuation force and a smooth, elastic feedback that is comfortable for extended typing sessions. While the Flame Red offers a more approachable and safe typing experience, the Swift provides a more responsive and low-impact typing feel that is ideal for activities such as gaming, schoolwork, or professional typing tasks.

In conclusion, the TTC Flame Red and HMX Swift switches offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Flame Red excels in providing a neutral sound profile and a mild, polished typing experience that caters to a wide range of users, while the Swift stands out with its clacky sound profile and easy-to-press, feathery, bouncy, and creamy feel that offers a responsive and comfortable typing experience. Depending on your preferences and intended use, both switches have their unique strengths that can enhance your overall typing and gaming experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will boil down to your personal preferences in sound, feel, and typing style.

Conclusion

To sum up, when choosing between the TTC Flame Red linear switch and the HMX Swift linear switch, consider the specific qualities of each switch to determine which one best suits your needs. If you prioritize visual aesthetics and enjoy a weightier smoothness with a clacky sound profile, the Flame Red may be the ideal choice for you, especially if you have a backlit RGB keyboard. On the other hand, if you prefer a deeper sound profile with a silky smoothness and a lighter actuation force, the Swift could be more to your liking. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences in terms of feel, sound, and usage scenarios.

Mentioned in this article