TTC Flaming Pink vs. KTT Phalaenopsis
An in-depth look at the TTC Flaming Pink and the KTT Phalaenopsis switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the ideal mechanical keyboard switch, preferences often boil down to individual needs and typing styles. The TTC Flaming Pink switch stands out for its linear design, delivering a smooth and responsive feel that caters equally to gamers and typists, offering a satisfying bottom-out sound that enhances the overall typing experience. With a bright yet not overly loud sound profile, it's an excellent choice for those who seek fluidity in their keystrokes. In contrast, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch presents a tactile experience with its 50g force requirement, delivering a discernible bump that makes each keystroke feel rewarding. Coupled with an impressive light actuation force of 37g, these switches minimize finger fatigue during long typing sessions, making them ideal for passionate typists. Ultimately, the choice between the two often rests on whether you prefer the smoothness of linear switches or the tactile feedback of a stepped design. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
1.60 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
24mm single-staged spring
Spring
22mm gold-plated spring
Housing materials
The TTC Flaming Pink and the KTT Phalaenopsis switches share a commonality in their top housing material, both utilizing polycarbonate. This shared material contributes to a similar auditory experience characterized by a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The rigidity of polycarbonate enhances sound clarity, allowing for a more resonant performance that caters to users who value auditory feedback in their typing experience. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate renders these switches particularly appealing for users who integrate RGB lighting in their setups, as the lighting can effectively illuminate the switch, creating a visually striking effect.
Contrasting the two switches, the bottom housing materials differ significantly. The Flaming Pink incorporates nylon, a material known for its softer properties, which leads to a deeper and fuller sound profile. In comparison, the Phalaenopsis features a polycarbonate bottom housing that mirrors the sonic characteristics of its top housing: sharp, clear, and resonant. This fundamental difference indicates that while both switches can produce clear sounds when activated, the Flaming Pink is likely to offer a more subdued and rounded sound due to the nylon's ability to absorb sound energy more effectively. Consequently, the typing feel and bottom-out experience on the Flaming Pink may feel softer compared to the Phalaenopsis, which would deliver a more pronounced auditory response.
In sum, the contrasting bottom housing materials between the TTC Flaming Pink and KTT Phalaenopsis create a distinct typing experience despite the similarities in their top housings. When typing on the Flaming Pink, the user benefits from a sound profile that is deeper and more rounded due to the nylon's propensity to absorb sound, whereas the Phalaenopsis will provide a more consistent clarity thanks to its uniform polycarbonate design in both the top and bottom housings. Ultimately, both switches cater to different preferences in sound and feel, allowing users to choose based on their desired auditory experience while maintaining the vibrant visual appeal of RGB compatibility through their polycarbonate top housings.
Weight
The TTC Flaming Pink linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch both exhibit light characteristics, which can be beneficial for extended typing sessions or gaming marathons. The Flaming Pink has an actuation force of 43 grams, while the Phalaenopsis is even lighter at 37 grams, making it the preferred choice for users seeking a softer touch. Both switches share the same bottom out force of 50 grams, indicating that, regardless of their actuation force differences, they will provide a consistent tactile experience when fully pressed down. This similarity in bottom out force ensures that users will experience a substantial feel upon bottoming out, despite the Phalaenopsis being the lighter option in terms of actuation. Overall, for users looking for a light feel in their typing, the KTT Phalaenopsis will be more appealing, while both switches will deliver a comparable bottoming out sensation.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the TTC Flaming Pink linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, it is clear that the Flaming Pink has a shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the Phalaenopsis has a longer travel distance of 4 mm. This difference in travel distance can significantly impact user experience. The Flaming Pink, being closer to the shallower end of the spectrum, may appeal to gamers seeking faster response times and more immediate feedback with each key press. On the other hand, the Phalaenopsis, with its traditional travel distance of 4 mm, provides a more substantial depth that some users might prefer for a more tactile and satisfying typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on individual preferences: the Flaming Pink offers swifter responses, while the Phalaenopsis caters to those who enjoy a more pronounced keystroke.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The TTC Flaming Pink has an MSRP of $4.29 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Flaming Pink for $4.00.
The KTT Phalaenopsis has an MSRP of $4.73 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Phalaenopsis for $4.15.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The sound profile of the TTC Flaming Pink switch is characterized by a bright yet not overly loud tone that strikes a balance between being pleasant and unobtrusive. This makes it suitable for both gaming and everyday typing, providing a responsive auditory feedback that enhances the overall experience without causing distraction. In contrast, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch boasts a bassy and thocky sound, delivering a deep, rich resonance with each keystroke. This impactful auditory feedback can add to the satisfaction of typing, producing a pronounced "thud" that many enthusiasts find desirable. While both switches cater to different preferences, the Flaming Pink offers a more nuanced sound that might appeal to users looking for a cleaner auditory experience.
When it comes to feel, the TTC Flaming Pink switch is celebrated for its smooth and responsive action, ensuring a seamless typing experience free from any hiccups or interruptions. This quality is particularly advantageous for gamers and typists alike, who benefit from its ease of use during extended sessions. On the other hand, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch provides a distinct tactile sensation, characterized by its stepped design. This means users can experience a discernible tactile bump at a 50g actuation force, making each keystroke feel more deliberate and engaging. While both switches aim to enhance user comfort, the Flaming Pink's linear smoothness contrasts with the Phalaenopsis's tactile feedback, catering to different typing styles.
In summary, both the TTC Flaming Pink and KTT Phalaenopsis switches offer unique qualities tailored to varied preferences. The Flaming Pink excels in delivering a smooth and responsive typing experience with its brighter sound, making it ideal for general use, while the Phalaenopsis provides a rich and bassy auditory experience coupled with tactile feedback that many users find delightful. Ultimately, users can select a switch based on their personal preferences for sound and feel, knowing that each option is designed to enhance their typing experience in its own way.
Conclusion
To wrap up, the choice between TTC Flaming Pink linear switches and KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switches ultimately hinges on your personal preferences and typing needs. If you prioritize a smooth and responsive feel along with a satisfying sound profile, the Flaming Pink switches are an excellent choice, especially for gaming where speed and efficiency are paramount. Their light 50g bottom-out force provides a quick and effortless experience, making them suitable for both casual and competitive setups. On the other hand, if you seek a more tactile feedback for your typing experience, the Phalaenopsis switches can be more appealing. The 50g actuation force combined with a 37g initial actuation offers a delightful tactile bump that enhances your typing accuracy and reduces finger fatigue during lengthy sessions. Additionally, the deeper, thocky sound signature of the Phalaenopsis adds a pleasing auditory component that some users find rewarding. Therefore, if you relish a responsive and tactile sensation during your typing, the Phalaenopsis would be a great fit, while the Flaming Pink should be your go-to for a smoother, more streamlined experience. Ultimately, your decision should align with what feels best for your unique typing style and the environments in which you use your keyboard.
Mentioned in this article
