TTC Flaming Purple vs. Gazzew LT
An in-depth look at the TTC Flaming Purple and the Gazzew LT switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between the TTC Flaming Purple and the Gazzew LT mechanical keyboard switches, enthusiasts are presented with two distinct options. The TTC Flaming Purple stands out for its resonant character and feathery nature, offering a poppy undertone that adds an engaging auditory flair to every keystroke. With an easy-to-press bottom-out of just 47g, this switch is perfect for both enthusiasts and daily typists. On the other hand, the Gazzew LT switches are known for their deep, resonant thockiness and seamless glide with every keystroke, thanks to their enticing lilac hue. Both switches share a 'bassy' and 'low-pitched' sound profile, but they offer slightly different typing experiences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
42g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
47g
Bottom-out force
65g
Pre-travel
1.60 mm
Pre-travel
N/A
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
3.20 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POK
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
23mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel Korean spring
Housing materials
The housing materials used in the TTC Flaming Purple and the Gazzew LT switches differ in their composition and resulting sound profiles. The Flaming Purple features a polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound. Polycarbonate is a stiffer plastic that resonates well, providing a clearer sound profile. In contrast, the LT utilizes a proprietary Gazzew blend top housing, known for delivering a rich and deep sound due to its softness. While both materials offer unique sound characteristics, the polycarbonate of the Flaming Purple leans towards a brighter sound, while the Gazzew blend of the LT produces a deeper tone.
On the other hand, the bottom housing materials of the Flaming Purple and the Gazzew LT switches share similarities in their sound profiles. The Flaming Purple's nylon bottom housing produces a deeper and fuller sound, as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. Similarly, the LT's proprietary Gazzew blend bottom housing also delivers a rich and deep sound profile due to its softness. This indicates that both switches offer a similar sound experience when it comes to their bottom housing materials, providing a consistent typing experience for users who prefer a deeper and fuller sound profile.
Overall, the choice between the TTC Flaming Purple and the Gazzew LT switches may come down to personal preference in sound characteristics. While the Flaming Purple's polycarbonate top housing offers a sharper and crisper sound, the Gazzew LT's proprietary blend top housing provides a richer and deeper tone. However, both switches share similarities in their bottom housing materials, with the nylon of the Flaming Purple and the Gazzew blend of the LT both offering a deep and full sound profile. Ultimately, users can expect a high-quality typing experience from either switch, with slight variations in sound based on the housing materials used.
Weight
In comparing the TTC Flaming Purple linear switch and the Gazzew LT linear switch, it is evident that there are notable differences in their actuation force and bottom out force. The Flaming Purple has a lighter actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 47 grams, providing a more gentle typing experience. On the other hand, the LT switch has a medium-heavy bottom out force of 65 grams, although the actuation force is unknown. This indicates that the LT switch may offer a more substantial and firmer typing feel compared to the Flaming Purple. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, the Flaming Purple would be the better choice, while those who prefer a heavier push feel may lean towards the LT switch. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out force.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the TTC Flaming Purple linear switch and the Gazzew LT linear switch, it is clear that the Flaming Purple has a longer travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the LT has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.2 mm. The difference of 0.4 mm may not seem significant, but it can impact the overall feel and responsiveness of the switch. For those who prefer a shorter travel distance for faster response times, the Gazzew LT would be the better option. On the other hand, individuals who prefer a more substantial key press and a greater sense of depth may find the TTC Flaming Purple to be more to their liking. Ultimately, both switches offer a different typing experience, and selecting between the two will depend on personal preference and typing style.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The TTC Flaming Purple has an MSRP of $8.30 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Flaming Purple for $4.30.
The Gazzew LT comes in at $6.50 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, both the TTC Flaming Purple and Gazzew LT switches offer a deep and rich auditory experience, with the Flaming Purple leaning slightly towards a bassier undertone while the LT provides a deep "thocky" sound. Despite these differences, both switches are likely to deliver a satisfying typing sound that appeals to enthusiasts seeking a distinct auditory feedback during typing sessions.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Flaming Purple is lauded for its feathery touch and easy-to-press nature, offering a light actuation force that reduces finger fatigue and enhances the overall typing experience. On the other hand, information on the feel of the Gazzew LT switches is unavailable. However, it can be inferred that as a linear switch, the LT may share some similarities with the Flaming Purple in terms of providing a smooth and effortless typing experience due to its linear nature.
In conclusion, both the TTC Flaming Purple and Gazzew LT switches offer unique qualities in terms of sound and potentially feel. While the Flaming Purple leans towards a bassier sound profile and a feathery typing experience, the LT promises a deep thocky sound and a smooth typing feel. Whether you prefer the slightly poppier sound of the Flaming Purple or the deep thockiness of the LT, both switches are likely to provide a satisfying typing experience for enthusiasts looking to enhance their mechanical keyboard setup.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the TTC Flaming Purple linear switch and the Gazzew LT linear switch, consider your preference for typing feel and sound profile. If you prioritize a light and effortless typing experience with a slightly bassier sound, the Flaming Purple with its 47g bottom out force may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-heavy switch with a deep thocky sound and a seamless glide with every keystroke, the Gazzew LT switch with its 65g bottom out force could be more suited to your preferences. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches boils down to personal preference in typing feel and sound characteristics.
Mentioned in this article
