Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black vs. Gazzew U4
An in-depth look at the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black and the Gazzew U4 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black, a linear switch, and the Gazzew U4, a tactile switch, offer distinct typing experiences for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. The G Pro 3.0 Black boasts a heavier actuation and bottom-out force, providing a more substantial typing experience for those who prefer a medium-heavy feel. Its medium-high pitch auditory feedback and vibrant RGB lighting effects make it stand out. On the other hand, the Gazzew U4 offers a sharp and exhilarating tactile bump with a plush bottom-out sensation, creating a whisper-quiet typing experience. Both switches have their unique qualities that cater to different preferences and needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
60g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
70g
Bottom-out force
62g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
N/A
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Proprietary INK blend
Top housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm gold-plated spring
Spring
Stainless steel 14mm Korean spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black and the Gazzew U4 both have their own unique characteristics that contribute to the sound profile of the switches. The G Pro 3.0 Black features a proprietary INK blend top housing that produces a clacky and relatively high-pitched sound, while the U4's Gazzew blend top housing delivers a rich and deep sound profile. On the other hand, the POM bottom housing of the G Pro 3.0 Black creates a unique and pleasing sound profile on the deeper side, while the U4's Gazzew blend bottom housing also contributes to a rich and deep sound due to its softness.
Despite having different housing materials, both the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black and the Gazzew U4 offer similar results in terms of sound profile due to the unique qualities of their respective housing materials. The top and bottom housings of each switch play a role in impacting the overall sound profile and feel of the switch. The bottom housing has more influence on the bottom-out sound and feel when the switch is pressed, while the top housing affects the sound when the key is released.
Overall, the G Pro 3.0 Black's proprietary INK blend top housing provides a clacky and high-pitched sound, complemented by the deep sound profile created by the POM bottom housing. In comparison, the Gazzew U4's Gazzew blend top and bottom housings work together to produce a rich and deep sound profile. The choice between these switches ultimately comes down to personal preference in terms of sound and feel, as both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences in mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
Weight
The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black linear switch has a heavier actuation force of 60 grams compared to the Gazzew U4 tactile switch, which requires only 45 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the G Pro 3.0 Black still requires a heavier 70 grams compared to the U4's 62 grams. Both switches provide a medium to medium-heavy typing experience, with the G Pro 3.0 Black leaning towards a more substantial push feel. For those who prefer a lighter touch, the U4 tactile switch would be the better option, allowing for longer typing sessions without fatigue. On the other hand, the G Pro 3.0 Black would be more suitable for users who prefer a stronger push feel for a more satisfying typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches would depend on personal preference and the type of typing experience one desires.
Travel distance
The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Gazzew U4 tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm. The G Pro 3.0 Black has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the U4. With a 0.4 mm difference in travel distance, the Gateron switch may provide a slightly deeper key press feel. However, both switches fall within the range of standard travel distances for mechanical keyboards. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference regarding key press depth and responsiveness. If you prefer a slightly longer travel distance, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black may be the better option for you. If you lean towards a shorter and quicker press, the Gazzew U4 tactile switch could be the more suitable choice.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black has an MSRP of $2.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the G Pro 3.0 Black for $2.77.
The Gazzew U4 comes in at $6.50 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black linear switch is known for its clacky and somewhat subdued nature, producing a sharp and snappy sound when pressed. On the other hand, the Gazzew U4 tactile switch is characterized by a muted and low-pitched sound, offering a quieter and more bass-heavy tone. Both switches provide distinct auditory experiences that cater to different preferences, with the G Pro 3.0 Black leaning towards a crisper sound and the U4 offering a more subdued and whisper-quiet profile.
When it comes to feel, the G Pro 3.0 Black is likened to a creamy and silky typing experience, providing a smooth and buttery sensation with each keystroke. The switch offers a subtle resistance that is not too light, making it suitable for various typing preferences. In contrast, the Gazzew U4 tactile switch is known for its sharp tactile bump, delivering a strong and crisp feedback intensity that can be felt distinctly with every keypress. While the G Pro 3.0 Black focuses on a smooth and subtle feel, the U4 excels in providing a pronounced tactile response that enhances the typing experience for those who prefer a more tactile feedback.
Overall, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black linear switch and the Gazzew U4 tactile switch offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. The G Pro 3.0 Black provides a clacky sound with a creamy and silky feel, catering to those who enjoy a medium-heavy typing experience. On the other hand, the U4 delivers a muted and low-pitched sound alongside a sharp tactile bump, appealing to users who prefer a more tactile and pronounced feedback. While both switches excel in their own right, it ultimately comes down to personal preference in sound and typing feel when choosing between the two.
Conclusion
In summary, when considering whether to choose the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black linear switch or the Gazzew U4 tactile switch, you should take into account your preference for typing experience. If you value a medium-heavy bottom-out force and a balanced medium-heavy feel with a clacky sound profile, then the G Pro 3.0 Black may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium bottom-out force with a sharp tactile bump and a muted, low-pitched sound profile, then the U4 switch might be more suitable. Ultimately, your decision should be based on whether you prefer a creamy, silky feel or a sharp, high feedback intensity when typing. Consider your preferences carefully to choose the switch that best fits your typing style and sound preferences.
Mentioned in this article
