Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black vs. Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear
An in-depth look at the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black and the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black and the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear mechanical keyboard switches, it's clear that both offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences. The G Pro 3.0 Black by Gateron boasts a heavier actuation and bottom-out force, providing a more substantial typing experience for those who enjoy a medium-heavy feel. On the other hand, the WS Aurora Clear by Wuque Studio offers a smoother, high-pitched typing experience with its lightly lubed POM stem and transparent housing that enhances RGB lighting customization. While the G Pro 3.0 Black emphasizes a clacky and subtle tactile experience, the WS Aurora Clear is known for its buttery and polished feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
60g
Actuation force
53g
Bottom-out force
70g
Bottom-out force
63.5g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Proprietary INK blend
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
UHWMPE
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm gold-plated spring
Spring
Double-staged stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black and the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear offer unique sound profiles and tactile experiences. The G Pro 3.0 Black's proprietary INK blend top housing provides a satisfying thin and higher-pitched sound, while the WS Aurora Clear's polycarbonate top housing produces a sharper and crisper sound. In terms of aesthetics, the clear polycarbonate housing of the WS Aurora Clear allows for RGB lighting to shine through, adding a visual element to the typing experience. Both switches offer distinct sound profiles in their top housings, catering to different preferences in keyboard enthusiasts.
Moving to the bottom housings, the G Pro 3.0 Black's POM material creates a deeper and more muted sound profile, providing a unique typing experience. In contrast, the WS Aurora Clear's UHWMPE bottom housing offers a bright sound signature with resonant clacks, adding a dynamic element to typing. The choice of bottom housing material can significantly impact the typing feel and sound of a switch, influencing the overall user experience. Whether you prefer a deeper and muted sound or a brighter and more resonant one, both switches cater to different preferences with their bottom housings.
When considering the overall typing experience, the combination of top and bottom housing materials in a switch plays a crucial role in determining the sound profile and tactile feedback. The impact of the bottom housing material is more pronounced in the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing material influences the sound when releasing a key. Understanding how these housing materials interact can help keyboard enthusiasts choose a switch that aligns with their preferences in terms of sound, feel, and aesthetics. Whether you opt for the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black or the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear, both switches offer unique characteristics that contribute to a satisfying typing experience.
Weight
The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black linear switch has a slightly heavier actuation force and bottom out force compared to the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear linear switch. The G Pro 3.0 Black requires 60 grams of force to actuate and 70 grams to bottom out, while the WS Aurora Clear needs 53 grams to actuate and 63.5 grams to bottom out. This means that the G Pro 3.0 Black offers a slightly more substantial typing experience with a bit more resistance, while the WS Aurora Clear provides a slightly lighter touch. Both switches fall into the medium-heavy category, making them suitable for users who prefer a solid push feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference regarding typing experience and desired force sensitivity.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear linear switch, we find that the G Pro 3.0 Black has a slightly longer travel distance of 4 mm compared to the WS Aurora Clear's 3.8 mm. While both switches fall within the range of traditional travel distances, the G Pro 3.0 Black offers a bit more depth when pressing the keys. Gamers looking for a faster response time may prefer the shorter travel distance of the WS Aurora Clear, while those who enjoy a more substantial keypress may opt for the G Pro 3.0 Black. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences in terms of keypress feel and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black has an MSRP of $2.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the G Pro 3.0 Black for $2.77.
The Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear comes in at $8.00 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black linear switch is known for its clacky and somewhat subdued noise profile, offering a crisp and percussive sound. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear linear switch produces a high-pitched and sharp sound when pressed, catering to those who prefer a more bright and crisp auditory experience. Depending on your preference for sound, you can expect different noise profiles from these two switches.
Moving on to the feel, the G Pro 3.0 Black switch provides a creamy, silky, and subtle typing experience, characterized by smooth and buttery key presses with minimal resistance. In contrast, the WS Aurora Clear switch offers a buttery, mild, and polished sensation, emphasizing a fluid and refined typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. Both switches aim to provide a comfortable and pleasant typing feel, catering to individuals who appreciate a smooth and effortless keystroke.
Considering all the available information, while the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black and the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear linear switches differ in their sound and feel characteristics, they both offer premium quality and a satisfying typing experience. Depending on whether you prefer a clacky and heavier switch like the G Pro 3.0 Black or a high-pitched and smooth switch like the WS Aurora Clear, you can achieve similar results in terms of overall typing satisfaction with either choice. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for sound and feel, along with your desired level of customization with RGB lighting effects.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Black linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Aurora Clear linear switch, consider the following factors. If you prioritize a more substantive typing experience with a medium-heavy feel and medium-high pitch sound, along with vibrant RGB lighting effects, the G Pro 3.0 Black is the way to go. On the other hand, if you prefer a smooth, high-pitched typing experience with maximum RGB lighting customization, minimal friction, and a smooth keystroke, the WS Aurora Clear is the ideal choice for you. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for typing feel, sound, and aesthetics.
Mentioned in this article
