United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron G Pro 3.0 White vs. Wuque Studio WS Morandi

An in-depth look at the Gateron G Pro 3.0 White and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

Introducing the Gateron G Pro 3.0 White and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi, two exceptional mechanical keyboard switches with a linear design. The G Pro 3.0 White is the perfect choice for those seeking a budget-friendly option without compromising on performance. With an incredibly light actuation force of only 38g, these switches offer effortless and sensitive keystrokes, making them ideal for delicate typists. Additionally, the frosted light diffuser allows for brighter RGB lighting, creating a visually appealing experience. On the other hand, the WS Morandi switches prioritize innovation and visual aesthetics. These ultra-smooth linear switches feature a light column that diffuses light, maximizing the beauty of RGB visuals. The unique UPE stem provides a distinct dry and airy smoothness, setting them apart from the standard creamy feel. With a slightly muted sound profile, these switches strike the perfect balance between form and function. However, let's dive deeper beyond these generalities to help you determine the best switch for your specific needs.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

38g

Actuation force

50g

Bottom-out force

45g

Bottom-out force

60g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

UPE

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

20mm lengthened stainless steel spring

Spring

18mm double-stage spring

Housing materials

The Gateron G Pro 3.0 White and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi both offer unique housing materials that contribute to their sound profiles. The G Pro 3.0 White's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharp, higher-pitched, and crisp sound. This is due to polycarbonate's stiffness, which results in a clear and resonant sound. In contrast, the WS Morandi's POM top housing produces a deeper and more muted sound. While both materials have their own distinct sound, they both excel in their ability to showcase RGB lighting due to their translucency.

In terms of the bottom housing, the G Pro 3.0 White utilizes a nylon material, which gives it a deeper and fuller sound. Nylon, being a softer plastic, absorbs more sound, resulting in a dulled and rounded sound profile. Similarly, the WS Morandi's POM bottom housing also contributes to a deeper and more muted sound. Both materials offer a unique and pleasing sound, albeit with slight differences.

When it comes to the overall typing experience, the bottom housing plays a significant role in the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing affects the sound when releasing a key. Therefore, if you were to compare the Gateron G Pro 3.0 White and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi, you would experience different sound profiles depending on the housing materials used. However, despite these differences, both switches offer a satisfying typing experience and showcase the distinct qualities of their respective housing materials.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gateron G Pro 3.0 White linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch, some notable differences can be observed. The G Pro 3.0 White features a relatively light actuation force of 38 grams, which means it requires a gentle touch to trigger a keystroke. The bottom out force for this switch is slightly heavier at 45 grams, providing a somewhat more substantial typing experience when fully pressing down the keys. On the other hand, information regarding the actuation force of the WS Morandi is unavailable, making it difficult to draw a direct comparison. However, the bottom out force for the WS Morandi is 60 grams, indicating that it requires a heavier press to fully bottom out the keys. Overall, the G Pro 3.0 White is lighter in terms of actuation force, while the WS Morandi offers a heavier bottom out force. This discrepancy means that those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the G Pro 3.0 White, while individuals seeking a more substantial and tactile feel may gravitate towards the WS Morandi.

Travel distance

The Gateron G Pro 3.0 White linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch have different travel distances. The G Pro 3.0 White has a travel distance of 4 mm, which is a more traditional distance, while the WS Morandi has a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. Gamers, in particular, often prefer shorter travel distances as it allows for faster response times. So if you are looking for a more responsive typing experience, the WS Morandi would be the better choice. However, some people may find shorter travel distances to feel too abrupt or lacking in depth. If you prefer a more substantial feeling when pressing down on a key, then the G Pro 3.0 White with its longer travel distance would be a better fit. Overall, it depends on personal preference and whether you prioritize responsiveness or a deeper feel in your typing experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron G Pro 3.0 White has an MSRP of $3.40 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the G Pro 3.0 White for $3.27.

The Wuque Studio WS Morandi has an MSRP of $4.30 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the WS Morandi for $3.90.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 White switch is described as having a clacky sound profile, producing a sharp and snappy sound when pressed. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Morandi switch offers a slightly more muted sound profile, described as subdued. This means that while the G Pro 3.0 White switch provides a crisp and percussive sound, the WS Morandi switch produces a dampened and subtle sound signature. It's important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps chosen. However, based on the information provided, the G Pro 3.0 White switch emphasizes a more vibrant and lively sound, while the WS Morandi switch leans towards a quieter and more understated sound.

In terms of feel, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 White switch is described as offering a creamy, easy-to-press, and feathery typing experience. The switch is buttery smooth, providing a silky sensation when typing, and requires minimal force to activate. This makes typing effortless, comfortable, and reduces finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. On the other hand, the WS Morandi switch is also described as having a buttery and silky typing experience. It offers a seamless and uniform typing sensation, minimizing resistance when pressing and releasing keys. Both switches prioritize smoothness and ease of typing, ensuring a pleasant and low-impact typing feel.

In summary, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 White linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch offer different subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. The G Pro 3.0 White switch provides a clacky sound with a vibrant and lively tone, while the WS Morandi switch offers a more subdued and muted sound profile. In terms of feel, both switches deliver a creamy and buttery typing experience, emphasizing smoothness and ease of typing. They are both known for their effortless and low-impact keystrokes, reducing finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. While they have slight differences, the switches provide similar results in terms of a premium typing feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference and the desired sound and feel for the keyboard setup.

Conclusion

In conclusion, if you are a delicate typist who values a light actuation force and effortless typing experience, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 White linear switch is the ideal choice for you. With its bottom out force of 45 grams and descriptors such as "easy-to-press," "feathery," and "silky," this switch offers a smooth and buttery typing feel that will reduce finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. Additionally, the G Pro 3.0 White provides a satisfying auditory feedback with a medium-high pitch and a clacky sound profile. Moreover, if you prefer brighter RGB lighting with a frosted light diffuser, this switch will meet your visual needs as well.

On the other hand, if you seek a switch that offers a slightly more muted sound profile and strikes a balance between form and function, the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch is worth considering. With a bottom out force of 60 grams and descriptors such as "subdued," "buttery," and "silky," this switch offers a unique dry, airy, and wispy smoothness, different from the creamy feel of factory-lubed switches. The WS Morandi provides a mesmerizing visual effect through its light column that diffuses RGB lighting, and it produces a low-pitched and thocky sound, creating a deep and satisfying typing experience.

In the end, your choice between the Gateron G Pro 3.0 White and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch depends on your preferences for actuation force, sound profile, and overall typing feel. Consider the specific qualities and characteristics described for each switch to determine which one aligns best with your typing style and aesthetic preferences.

Mentioned in this article