United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow vs. Haimu Neo White

An in-depth look at the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow and the Haimu Neo White switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow and the Haimu Neo White mechanical keyboard switches, we see two linear switches that offer unique qualities to enhance your typing experience. The G Pro 3.0 Yellow is known for its budget-friendly excellence, providing a polished, high-pitched sound profile and a bouncy typing feel. On the other hand, the Neo White stands out with its medium weight and smooth actuation due to the rare use of a Ly stem, offering a satisfying typing experience. While the G Pro 3.0 Yellow has a more resonant feel, the Neo White provides a neutral and mild typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

50g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

67g

Bottom-out force

58g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

Ly

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

15.4mm long spring

Spring

Double-staged spring

Housing materials

In comparing the housing materials of the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow and the Haimu Neo White, it is evident that both switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housing. Polycarbonate is known for its stiffness, resulting in a sharper and crisper sound profile. The translucency of polycarbonate also makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting, enhancing the visual appeal of the keyboard. The clarity and resonant sound produced by polycarbonate top housings contribute to an overall premium feel for both switches.

However, when it comes to the bottom housing material, the G Pro 3.0 Yellow opts for nylon, while the Neo White also utilizes nylon for its bottom housing. Nylon is characterized by its softer nature, absorbing more sound and creating a deeper and fuller sound profile. The duller and rounder sound produced by nylon bottom housings can offer a more tactile typing experience, adding a layer of comfort to prolonged typing sessions. Both switches benefit from nylon bottom housings in terms of sound quality and overall typing feel.

Despite the differences in bottom housing materials, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow and the Haimu Neo White share similar characteristics in their use of polycarbonate for the top housing. This consistency in material choice ensures that both switches deliver a sharp, high-pitched, and clear sound profile. The combination of polycarbonate top housings and nylon bottom housings in these switches demonstrates a thoughtful approach to sound quality and tactile feedback, catering to the preferences of different users while maintaining a high standard of performance.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow linear switch and the Haimu Neo White linear switch, it is evident that they have different characteristics. The G Pro 3.0 Yellow has a heavier actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 67 grams, providing a medium-heavy typing experience. In contrast, the Neo White has an unknown actuation force but a bottom out force of 58 grams, making it a medium switch. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Neo White due to its lower bottom out force, allowing for longer typing sessions without fatigue. On the other hand, the G Pro 3.0 Yellow is suitable for users who enjoy a more substantial push feel while typing. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.

Travel distance

The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Haimu Neo White linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm. In this case, the G Pro 3.0 Yellow has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Neo White. The 0.4 mm difference may not seem significant, but it can impact the typing or gaming experience for individuals who are sensitive to key travel distances. Both switches fall within the range of traditional travel distances, with the Neo White being on the shallower end. Gamers looking for faster response times might prefer the Neo White with its shorter travel distance, while those who enjoy a bit more depth in their keystrokes may opt for the G Pro 3.0 Yellow. Ultimately, the decision between the two will depend on personal preference for travel distance.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow has an MSRP of $3.10 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the G Pro 3.0 Yellow for $2.78.

The Haimu Neo White comes in at $2.70 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow linear switch is recognized for its high-pitched and resonant qualities, producing a sharp and crisp sound when pressed. This can provide a more vibrant and immersive auditory experience for users who prefer a brighter sound profile. On the other hand, the Haimu Neo White linear switch offers a neutral sound profile, making it suitable for a wide range of users and environments due to its moderate actuation force requirement. The sound produced by both switches can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps being used.

When it comes to feel, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow switch is described as polished and creamy, offering a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. This can result in a sleek and comfortable typing sensation that some users may find highly enjoyable. In contrast, the Haimu Neo White switch provides a mild typing experience, with characteristics that are more gentle and approachable to a wider range of users. The use of a Ly stem in the Neo White switch contributes to a smooth actuation, enhancing the overall typing comfort.

Overall, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow linear switch stands out for its high-pitched sound profile and creamy typing feel, providing users with a satisfying and bouncy typing experience. On the other hand, the Haimu Neo White linear switch offers a neutral sound profile and a mild typing feel, making it a versatile option suitable for various preferences and environments. While both switches have their own unique qualities, users can expect a smooth and enjoyable typing experience with either choice, depending on their personal preferences and requirements.

Conclusion

To conclude, when choosing between the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Yellow and the Haimu Neo White linear switches, consider your preferences for typing experience. If you enjoy a slightly heavier bottom out force and a higher-pitched sound profile with a bouncy feel, the G Pro 3.0 Yellow may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force and a more neutral sound profile with a smooth actuation, the Neo White switch could be more suited to your typing style. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences, so it is essential to consider what aspects are most important to you in a keyboard switch when making your decision.

Mentioned in this article