KTT Glimp vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2
An in-depth look at the KTT Glimp and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the KTT Glimp, a linear switch, to the Jerrzi Lotus V2, also a linear switch, there are both similarities and differences to consider. The Glimp switch is renowned for its medium-light feel, providing a balanced typing experience with tactile feedback and comfortable actuation force. Its clacky sound profile adds an enjoyable auditory element to typing sessions. On the other hand, the Lotus V2 doesn't have a distinct reputation like the Glimp but may offer a unique typing experience for those seeking something different. While both are linear switches, the Glimp is known for its satisfying typing feel and sound profile, while the Lotus V2 remains a bit of a mystery in terms of its characteristics. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
18mm spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the KTT Glimp and the Jerrzi Lotus V2, it is evident that both switches offer unique sound profiles based on their top housing material. The Glimp's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound, while the Lotus V2's POM top housing produces a deeper and more muted sound. The use of polycarbonate in the Glimp lends itself well to RGB lighting due to its translucency, while the POM material in the Lotus V2 offers a more refined and subtle aesthetic.
Moving on to the bottom housing materials, both switches showcase distinct characteristics. The Glimp's nylon bottom housing provides a deeper and fuller sound profile, thanks to its softer plastic composition that absorbs more sound. Similarly, the Lotus V2's POM bottom housing contributes to a deep and muted sound, aligning with its overall sound profile. Despite using different materials for their bottom housings, both switches offer a pleasing typing experience with unique acoustic qualities.
Overall, the choice of housing materials for switches plays a significant role in determining the sound profile and typing experience. While the Glimp and Lotus V2 utilize different materials for their top and bottom housings, they each offer a distinctive sound profile that caters to different preferences. Whether you prefer a sharper, crisper sound like the Glimp's polycarbonate housing, or a deeper, more muted sound like the Lotus V2's POM housing, both switches provide an enjoyable typing experience with their respective materials.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, it is evident that the Glimp has a lighter actuation force of 43 grams compared to the Lotus V2's 45 grams, making the Glimp the lighter option. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Glimp requires 53 grams, while the Lotus V2's bottom out force is unknown. The Glimp offers a medium-light typing experience, whereas the Lotus V2's bottom out force remains a mystery. The weight of a switch is crucial as it can affect typing comfort and endurance. Some may prefer the lighter actuation force of the Glimp for extended typing or gaming sessions, while others may lean towards the Lotus V2 for a heavier typing feel to provide a more substantial typing experience. Both switches have their strengths, and the choice between them ultimately depends on individual preferences and typing style.
Travel distance
The KTT Glimp linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. In this case, the Glimp has a longer travel distance compared to the Lotus V2. The Glimp's 4 mm travel distance provides a more traditional feel, offering a deeper press when typing. On the other hand, the Lotus V2's 3.4 mm travel distance is slightly shorter, making it favored by gamers looking for faster response times. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance, with the Glimp offering a deeper press and the Lotus V2 providing a quicker response.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Glimp has an MSRP of $3.84 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Glimp for $3.45.
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When comparing the subjective qualities of the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, in terms of sound, the Glimp switch is noted for its clacky sound profile, which provides a sharp and snappy auditory experience while typing. This adds a satisfying element to your typing sessions. On the other hand, information about the sound profile of the Lotus V2 switch is not available, so it is difficult to draw a direct comparison.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Glimp switch is described as offering a creamy typing experience, characterized by a smooth and buttery sensation when typing. This results in effortless keystrokes that glide across the keys with ease. In contrast, the Lotus V2 switch lacks available information on its feel quality, making it challenging to assess the differences between the two switches in this aspect.
Overall, based on the information provided, the KTT Glimp linear switch appears to offer a clacky sound profile and a creamy typing feel, providing users with a satisfying auditory and tactile experience. While information on the sound and feel qualities of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is lacking, it is important to consider factors such as personal preference, typing style, and the overall keyboard setup when choosing between these switches to ensure a satisfactory typing experience.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, it ultimately comes down to personal preference and intended use. If you are looking for a medium-light switch with a tactile feedback, satisfying typing experience, and clacky sound profile, then the Glimp would be a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with an unknown bottom out force and are not concerned about sound or feel descriptors, the Lotus V2 might be the switch for you. Consider your typing preferences, sound preferences, and overall typing experience when making your decision between these two switches.
Mentioned in this article
