KTT Glimp vs. HMX Lucky
An in-depth look at the KTT Glimp and the HMX Lucky switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When exploring the world of mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT Glimp and HMX Lucky stand out as two compelling options for enthusiasts seeking a linear typing experience with their distinctive characteristics. The KTT Glimp is celebrated for its medium-light actuation force, offering a satisfying balance between resistance and responsiveness, making it ideal for users who want a significant typing experience without feeling overwhelmed. Its clacky sound profile adds an enjoyable auditory element, enriching the typing experience for those who appreciate a bit of feedback. In contrast, the HMX Lucky switches are designed with a softer, glittery nylon housing that contributes to a lightweight feel while delivering a neutral and deeply satisfying typing experience. This makes the Lucky switches particularly appealing for users who prefer a smoother and quieter operation. Both switches cater to different user preferences, with the Glimp excelling in tactile feedback and sound, while the Lucky offers a softer, more subdued typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
43g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
18mm spring
Spring
22mm double-staged spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Glimp and the HMX Lucky switches present a striking contrast in terms of their top housing compositions. The Glimp utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for its rigidity and ability to produce a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile. This formulation not only enhances the clarity of sound but also allows for superior light transmission, making it ideal for RGB lighting setups. In comparison, the Lucky employs a nylon top housing, a more traditional choice that tends to absorb sound, resulting in a deeper, fuller auditory experience. Thus, while both switches serve similar purposes, the choice of material in the top housing distinctly influences the sound signature, providing a clear delineation in the type of auditory feedback users can expect.
On the other hand, the bottom housings of both switches are made from nylon, rendering them identical in this aspect. This commonality means that the deeper and rounder sound profile produced by the nylon material is consistent across both models when pressing the keys. As defined previously, the bottom housing significantly impacts the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch. Consequently, both the Glimp and the Lucky will exhibit similar characteristics in response to keystrokes, with the nylon’s sound-absorbing properties contributing to a satisfying typing experience that prioritizes a deeper acoustic response.
The interplay between the differing top housing materials and the shared nylon bottom housing ultimately dictates the overall acoustic signature of each switch. With this configuration, the Glimp can be expected to produce a crisper sound when a key is released, contrasted by the more muted sound profile of the Lucky during the same action. Therefore, while both switches can deliver satisfying auditory feedback when bottoming out due to their common nylon bottom housing, the tonal differences during key release will depend significantly on the choice of top material, creating an engaging exploration for users seeking tailored sound experiences in their mechanical keyboards.
Weight
When comparing the KTT Glimp linear switch and the HMX Lucky linear switch, the differences in actuation force and bottom out force become significant for users' typing preferences. The KTT Glimp features an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, categorizing it as medium-light. In contrast, the HMX Lucky offers a lighter experience with an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 43 grams, labeling it as light. This means that users who favor a lower actuation force and lighter keystrokes will likely prefer the Lucky switch, as it provides a more effortless typing experience, making it well-suited for lengthy sessions such as gaming or work. On the other hand, those who appreciate more tactile feedback from a heavier switch may gravitate towards the KTT Glimp for its more substantial feel. Ultimately, if one weights typing comfort over resistance, the Lucky is the choice, while the Glimp would cater to those who enjoy a firmer push.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the KTT Glimp and HMX Lucky linear switches, the KTT Glimp has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the HMX Lucky has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.8 mm. This means that the Glimp offers a more pronounced depth when pressed down, catering to users who prefer a substantial feel with each keystroke. In contrast, the Lucky, with its shorter travel distance, may appeal to gamers and others seeking quicker response times. Ultimately, if you favor a more responsive experience and don't mind the feeling of an abrupt actuation, the Lucky could be the ideal choice. However, if you value a deeper, more tactile engagement while typing, the Glimp's longer travel distance might be more satisfying.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Glimp has an MSRP of $3.84 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Glimp for $3.45.
The HMX Lucky has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lucky for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Glimp switch captures attention with its clacky profile, producing a crisp and bright auditory experience that enhances the keyboard's character. The sharp, percussive sound adds an enjoyable element during typing sessions, making each keystroke feel lively. In contrast, the HMX Lucky switch is described as having a neutral sound profile. This moderation makes the Lucky switch versatile, suitable for a variety of environments, whether for casual or professional use. However, since there’s no specific sound descriptor for the Lucky, one might assume that it prioritizes a more subdued auditory experience, contrasting with the vibrant clack of the Glimp.
As for the feel, the KTT Glimp switch stands out with its creamy typing sensation, offering a smooth and buttery experience thanks to its design and potential factory lubrication. Coupled with a mild actuation force, it provides a responsive yet comfortable typing experience that appeals to both beginners and seasoned typists alike. The Lucky switch, on the other hand, is characterized by its lightweight nature and soft nylon housing, resulting in a neutral and satisfying touch. While the Glimp offers a more pronounced and luxurious feel, the Lucky likely provides a more understated yet comfortable alternative, appealing to those who might prefer less tactile feedback.
In summary, the KTT Glimp and HMX Lucky linear switches offer distinctive qualities that cater to different preferences. The Glimp’s clacky sound and creamy feel create an engaging and enjoyable typing experience, while the Lucky’s neutral sound and simplistic approach deliver a different kind of satisfaction altogether. Ultimately, whether you gravitate towards the vibrant feedback of the Glimp or the balanced nature of the Lucky, both switches can provide fulfilling experiences—it's simply a matter of personal choice in sound and feel.
Conclusion
To wrap up, when considering whether to choose the KTT Glimp linear switch or the HMX Lucky linear switch, it ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing style. If you enjoy a bit more resistance and a clacky sound profile that adds an engaging auditory layer to your typing experience, the medium-light 53-gram actuation force of the Glimp might be more suited for you. Its creamy feel and satisfying feedback make it a solid choice for both typists who demand a substantial tactile experience and those who simply enjoy the sensory pleasure of typing. On the other hand, if you favor a lighter touch and a more neutral sound profile, the 43-gram actuation force of the Lucky will provide you with an effortlessly smooth typing experience. This switch excels in situations where you seek speed and reduced fatigue, making it ideal for long typing sessions or fast-paced gaming. Therefore, consider how you strike that balance between sound, feel, and actuation force—these factors will guide your choice between the Glimp and Lucky switches.
Mentioned in this article
