KTT Glimp vs. HMX SU
An in-depth look at the KTT Glimp and the HMX SU switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT Glimp and the HMX SU present two compelling linear options that cater to different preferences in typing experience. The KTT Glimp is celebrated for its medium-light actuation force, which strikes a harmonious balance between resistance and responsiveness, making it an ideal choice for users who enjoy a robust typing experience without feeling fatigued. Its tactile feedback and clacky sound profile add a satisfying auditory element, enhancing the overall enjoyment of each keystroke. In contrast, the HMX SU offers a more subtle yet deeper sound profile, thanks to its full PA12 housing paired with a T5 stem. This switch is perfect for those who prefer a quieter typing experience while still enjoying the smoothness and consistency that linear switches provide. As both switches cater to distinct typing preferences, it ultimately depends on whether you lean towards a more engaging auditory experience with the Glimp or favor the quiet elegance of the SU. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
T5
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
18mm spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The KTT Glimp and HMX SU switches feature distinct materials in their top housings, with the Glimp utilizing polycarbonate while the SU opts for nylon. The choice of polycarbonate for the Glimp contributes to a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, enhancing clarity and resonance due to the material's stiffness. This characteristic makes it particularly effective for RGB lighting applications, as its translucency allows for vibrant illumination to shine through. In contrast, the SU's nylon top housing results in a deeper and fuller sound, as the softer plastic absorbs sound waves more effectively, producing a duller and rounder acoustic profile. Consequently, while the Glimp's polycarbonate aims for brightness and clarity, the SU focuses on warmth and depth, showcasing the differing aesthetic and acoustic priorities in their designs.
When examining the bottom housings, both the KTT Glimp and HMX SU utilize nylon. Nylon is well-regarded as a classic material for switch bases, delivering a sound that is consistent across both models. The softness of the nylon in the bottom housing results in a more muted and rounded sound profile, promoting a deeper auditory experience during key presses. Since both models share this material in their bottom housings, the overall sound characteristics when typing will be notably similar—they will both likely exhibit that deeper, fuller quality associated with nylon. This shared choice means that, regardless of the differences in their top housings, users can expect a consistent auditory feel during the actuation and bottom-out stages for both switches.
Ultimately, the contrasting top housing materials of the KTT Glimp and HMX SU produce unique auditory experiences, while their shared nylon bottom housing ensures a certain level of continuity in sound depth. For users who seek a bright, defined acoustic response, the Glimp may be the preferred choice. At the same time, those who favor a warm and rounded experience may gravitate towards the SU. However, a significant aspect of both switches remains grounded in the common characteristics imparted by the nylon bottom housing. With a nuanced balance of sound profiles derived from their respective materials, both the Glimp and SU can deliver satisfying results, appealing to different preferences within the mechanical keyboard community.
Weight
When comparing the KTT Glimp linear switch and the HMX SU linear switch, both the actuation force and bottom out force reveal interesting differences. The KTT Glimp features an actuation force of 43 grams, which is slightly lighter than the HMX SU's actuation force of 45 grams. In terms of bottom out force, the Glimp has a force of 53 grams, while the SU provides a slightly lighter bottom out force of 50 grams. This means that the Glimp requires a bit more force to bottom out than the SU switch. Consequently, the Glimp can be considered the heavier switch overall due to its higher actuation and bottom out forces, while the SU is the lighter option. Therefore, for users who prefer a more substantial typing experience, the KTT Glimp may be more appealing, whereas those who value a lighter touch for longer typing sessions might gravitate towards the HMX SU.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the KTT Glimp linear switch and the HMX SU linear switch, we find that the Glimp features a travel distance of 4 mm, while the SU comes in at 3.6 mm. This makes the Glimp the longer option, providing a more traditional depth that some users may find more satisfying. Conversely, the shorter 3.6 mm travel distance of the SU may cater to those who seek a quicker response time, a feature often favored by gamers looking for efficiency in their keystrokes. Those who prioritize rapid actuation might find the SU more appealing, whereas users who appreciate a more substantial key feel may gravitate towards the Glimp. Ultimately, the choice between these switches hinges on personal preference regarding the balance between responsiveness and key depth.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Glimp has an MSRP of $3.84 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Glimp for $3.45.
The HMX SU has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the SU for $3.29.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT Glimp switch is characterized by a fairly clacky profile, producing a sharp and snappy sound that can be crisp and bright. This clackiness adds an enjoyable auditory dimension to the typing experience, making it an engaging choice for users who appreciate a more pronounced acoustic feedback during their typing sessions. In contrast, the HMX SU linear switch is noted for its subtle and relatively deep sound profile, which is likely less intrusive compared to the Glimp’s. This indicates that while the Glimp delivers an energetic auditory response, the SU provides a more muted sound experience, making it suitable for quieter environments or preferences.
When it comes to feel, the Glimp stands out with a creamy typing experience, where the smoothness can make each keystroke feel luxurious and fluid. This is often enhanced by factory lubrication or specific material choices, leading to a typing sensation that is both satisfying and gentle on the fingers. The Glimp's mild characteristics further ensure that it provides an approachable experience for typists of all levels, balancing responsiveness with comfort. The feel of the HMX SU linear switch is unknown, leaving its tactile feedback and typing experience open to speculation, but one could expect a different, perhaps less fluid sensation than the creamy nature of the Glimp.
In conclusion, both the KTT Glimp and HMX SU linear switches offer distinct auditory and tactile experiences. The Glimp’s clackiness and creamy feel make it well-suited for typists seeking an engaging and satisfying touch, while the SU’s deeper sound profile suggests a more understated approach, possibly appealing to users wanting a quieter environment. Ultimately, while the Glimp shines in providing a lively and enjoyable feedback, we can only speculate regarding the SU’s qualities. Depending on personal preference, either switch may fulfill a mechanical keyboard enthusiast's needs, though they will cater to different tastes in sound and feel.
Conclusion
To conclude, choosing between the KTT Glimp and the HMX SU linear switches really comes down to your preferred typing experience and the environment in which you'll be using them. If you appreciate a medium-light actuation force combined with a satisfying clacky sound profile, the Glimp is an excellent choice. Its creamy feel enhances the overall typing experience, making it ideal for both gaming and general typing, especially if you enjoy a more engaging auditory feedback while you type. On the other hand, if you're looking for something lighter and more subdued, the HMX SU linear switch might be the way to go. With its 50-gram actuation force and a subtle, deep sound profile, the SU is a solid option for those who prioritize a smoother, quieter experience, making it suitable for office environments or late-night gaming sessions. Therefore, consider your personal preferences in terms of sound, feel, and the context in which you'll be using the keyboard when making your decision.
Mentioned in this article
