KTT Glimp vs. Gazzew U4Tx
An in-depth look at the KTT Glimp and the Gazzew U4Tx switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to consider are the KTT Glimp and the Gazzew U4Tx. The Glimp switch is a linear switch that strikes the perfect balance for those seeking a substantial typing experience without overwhelming resistance. It offers a satisfying tactile feedback and comfortable actuation force, and its fairly clacky sound profile adds an enjoyable auditory element to your typing sessions. On the other hand, the Gazzew U4Tx switch marries the best of both worlds by providing a cleaner, refined sound profile. The U4T offers a deep, resonant "thock" when bottoming out, while the U4 provides a whisper-quiet stealth when topping out. Each press on the U4Tx switch delivers a sharp, satisfying tactile bump, ensuring a luxurious typing experience that's as acoustically pleasing as it is tactile. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
62.5g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
N/A
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Proprietary Gazzew blend
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
18mm spring
Spring
Stainless steel Korean spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Glimp and the Gazzew U4Tx differ in terms of their composition and resulting sound profiles. The Glimp utilizes a polycarbonate top housing that creates a sharper and crisper sound due to its relatively stiffer plastic. This results in a higher-pitched sound profile, which is further enhanced by the translucency of polycarbonate that allows for RGB lighting effects. On the other hand, the U4Tx features a proprietary Gazzew blend top housing, often referred to as "boba plastic." The softness of this blend delivers a rich and deep sound profile when typing, offering a distinct auditory experience compared to the Glimp.
In terms of the bottom housing, the Glimp employs a nylon material known for its classic switch housing qualities. Typing on switches with nylon bottom housing leads to a deeper and fuller sound profile. The relatively softer nature of nylon allows for better sound absorption, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. In contrast, the U4Tx incorporates its proprietary Gazzew blend bottom housing. This "boba plastic" also offers a softness that contributes to a rich and deep sound profile, providing a similar tonal experience to the nylon bottom housing of the Glimp.
While both the Glimp and the U4Tx have distinct top and bottom housing materials, the qualities of each housing material still contribute to the overall sound experience of the switches. When pressing down on either switch, the properties of the bottom housing become more noticeable in terms of the bottom-out sound and feel. Conversely, the top housing has a greater impact on the sound produced when releasing a key. Therefore, despite their differences, both the Glimp and the U4Tx possess unique housing materials that contribute to the overall sound profile and typing experience, albeit through different means.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Gazzew U4Tx tactile switch, there are a few notable differences. The Glimp has an actuation force of 43 grams, which is considered medium-light, while the U4Tx's actuation force is unknown. However, the bottom out force of the Glimp is 53 grams, which is also in the medium-light range. In contrast, the U4Tx has a bottom out force of 65 grams, making it medium-heavy.
Considering weight is important for several reasons. Some individuals prefer a lighter switch as it allows them to type for longer periods without fatigue, which is particularly beneficial for those using a keyboard for work or extended gaming sessions. Conversely, some users prefer a stronger actuation force for a more substantial typing experience. For these individuals, a switch with a heavier actuation force would be more suitable.
In terms of weight, the Glimp can be considered lighter, as its actuation and bottom out forces are consistently in the medium-light range. Conversely, the U4Tx is heavier, with its bottom out force falling into the medium-heavy category.
While the actuation force of the U4Tx is unknown, it is possible to make a comparison based on the stated ranges. If the actuation force of the U4Tx is similar to its bottom out force, it could be assumed that it falls into the medium-heavy category, providing a more substantial keystroke experience.
Overall, the KTT Glimp linear switch offers a slightly lighter typing experience with its medium-light actuation and bottom out forces. On the other hand, the Gazzew U4Tx tactile switch provides a heavier feel, particularly with its medium-heavy bottom out force.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Gazzew U4Tx tactile switch, it is clear that they have slightly different distances. The Glimp has a travel distance of 4.0 mm, while the U4Tx has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm. The Glimp, with its 4.0 mm travel distance, falls into the more traditional range, providing a level of depth that some may prefer. On the other hand, the U4Tx offers a slightly shallower travel distance, making it more suitable for those who prioritize faster response times, such as gamers. Both switches offer distinct advantages depending on personal preference. If responsiveness is important to you, the shorter travel distance of the U4Tx may be the better option. However, if you enjoy a deeper and more satisfying keystroke, the longer travel distance of the Glimp may be more suitable. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences and the desired typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Glimp has an MSRP of $3.84 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Glimp for $3.45.
The Gazzew U4Tx comes in at $6.50 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Glimp linear switch has a clacky sound profile. It produces a sharp and snappy sound when pressed, giving your typing sessions a crisp, bright, and percussive auditory experience. On the other hand, the Gazzew U4Tx tactile switch offers a cleaner and refined sound profile. It combines the deep, resonant "thock" when bottoming out with the whisper-quiet stealth when topping out. This creates a pleasing acoustic experience with a lower frequency range resembling rich bass tones. Both switches provide unique sound characteristics that can enhance your typing experience in different ways.
In terms of feel, the KTT Glimp linear switch offers a medium-light typing experience with a satisfying tactile feedback and comfortable actuation force. It strikes a perfect balance for those who desire a substantial typing feel without overwhelming resistance. The switch feels creamy, delivering a smooth and buttery sensation as you effortlessly glide your fingers across the keys. The Gazzew U4Tx tactile switch, on the other hand, offers a sharp tactile bump with high feedback intensity. Each keypress is distinctly felt, providing a luxurious typing experience. The U4Tx switch stands out for its pronounced and crisp tactile characteristics. Both switches offer different tactile experiences, catering to different preferences and typing styles.
In conclusion, the KTT Glimp linear switch and Gazzew U4Tx tactile switch have distinct subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Glimp switch provides a clacky sound profile with a medium-light typing feel and a creamy sensation. The U4Tx switch offers a bassy sound profile with a sharp tactile bump and a luxurious typing experience. The choice between the two switches depends on your personal preferences in terms of sound, feel, and typing experience. If you prefer a clacky sound and a medium-light typing feel, the Glimp switch is a suitable choice. If you prefer a bassy sound and a sharp tactile bump, the U4Tx switch would be a better fit. It's important to consider other factors such as your choice of keyboard board and keycaps, as they can also influence the overall sound and feel of the switches.
Conclusion
In closing, if you're looking for a medium-light switch with a satisfying typing experience and a clacky sound profile, the KTT Glimp linear switch is the way to go. It strikes a perfect balance between resistance and comfort, making it ideal for those seeking a substantial typing experience. On the other hand, if you prefer a cleaner, refined sound profile with a deeper and richer tone, the Gazzew U4Tx tactile switch is the better choice. Its "thock" when bottoming out, coupled with the whisper-quiet topping out, provides a luxurious typing experience that's both acoustically pleasing and tactile. Moreover, if you're someone who enjoys a sharp and crisp tactile bump with each keypress, the U4Tx is the switch for you. Ultimately, the decision between the KTT Glimp and Gazzew U4Tx will depend on your preference for sound and feel, so choose the one that aligns with your typing preferences and enhances your overall keyboarding experience.