KTT Glimp vs. Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile
An in-depth look at the KTT Glimp and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch are two popular options to consider. The Glimp switch is praised for its medium-light feel, providing just the right amount of resistance for a satisfying typing experience. With tactile feedback and a clacky sound profile, it offers a balance between comfort and response. On the other hand, the WS Light Tactile switch boasts smoothness and a noticeable tactile bump, alongside a neutral sound signature. It is easy to press and offers a stepped feel. While each switch has its own strengths, such as the Glimp's creamy and mild characteristics and the Light Tactile's ease of pressing, it ultimately comes down to personal preference. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
18mm spring
Spring
15.4mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
The KTT Glimp and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile both feature polycarbonate top housings, which result in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to the relatively stiff nature of polycarbonate. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that utilize RGB lighting. On the other hand, the Glimp's nylon bottom housing offers a deeper and fuller sound profile as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound when typing. Similarly, the WS Light Tactile's nylon bottom housing provides the same qualities, emphasizing a deeper and fuller sound profile during key presses.
While both the Glimp and the WS Light Tactile share similarities in their use of polycarbonate top housings, their differing bottom housings showcase the unique properties of nylon. The split between the top and bottom housing materials allows for a balance in sound and feel when typing on these switches. The bottom housing's impact on the bottom-out sound and feel is influenced by the softer nature of nylon, creating a more muffled and rounded typing experience. Conversely, the top housing plays a significant role in the sound produced when releasing a key, enhancing the overall typing experience.
In conclusion, the KTT Glimp and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile offer a combination of polycarbonate and nylon housing materials that cater to different preferences in sound profiles. While the polycarbonate top housings create a sharper and crisper sound, the nylon bottom housings provide a deeper and fuller sound experience. Both switches offer a unique typing experience based on the material composition of their housings, showcasing the importance of housing materials in determining overall sound and feel.
Weight
The KTT Glimp linear switch has a slightly lighter actuation force of 43 grams compared to the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switch, which has an actuation force of 45 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Glimp requires 53 grams while the WS Light Tactile only needs 50 grams, making the latter slightly lighter in this aspect. Both switches fall in the lighter force range, which may appeal to those who prefer a gentler typing experience for extended use. However, for users who prefer a bit more resistance and feedback while typing, they may find the heavier bottom out force of the Glimp more suited to their typing style. Ultimately, the decision between these switches would depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
Both the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch have the same travel distance of 4 mm. This means that when you press down on a key using either of these switches, you will experience the same amount of travel. This ensures consistent typing experience between the two switches. With their equal travel distance, users can expect similar results in terms of keypress feel and feedback. Whether using the KTT Glimp linear switch or the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch, the travel distance remains the same, providing a familiar typing experience regardless of which switch is chosen.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Glimp has an MSRP of $3.84 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Glimp for $3.45.
The Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile comes in at $4.20 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Glimp linear switch offers a clacky experience with a sharp and percussive sound when pressed, adding an enjoyable auditory element to typing sessions. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch provides a neutral sound signature, which is suitable for various purposes and environments. Both switches offer different sound profiles, so the choice between them would depend on personal preference and the overall sound setup of the keyboard.
In terms of feel, the KTT Glimp linear switch provides a creamy and smooth typing experience, offering a buttery sensation with each keystroke. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch offers a stepped feel with two stages of feedback, making it feel more mild and approachable. Additionally, the WS Light Tactile switch is easy-to-press, requiring minimal force to activate, which enhances the typing experience by reducing finger fatigue during extended use. The choice between these switches would depend on whether the user prefers a smoother, creamy feel or a more stepped and easy-to-press tactile sensation.
In conclusion, the KTT Glimp linear switch offers a clacky sound profile and a creamy, mild typing feel, while the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch provides a neutral sound signature and a stepped, easy-to-press tactile feel. Both switches have their unique qualities that cater to different preferences and typing styles. Ultimately, the decision between these switches would rely on personal preference in terms of sound, feel, and overall typing experience. If the user enjoys a clacky sound and creamy feel, the Glimp switch would be the choice, whereas if they prefer a neutral sound and a stepped, easy-to-press feel, the WS Light Tactile switch would be the better option.
Conclusion
In closing, when choosing between the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch, consider the following factors. If you are looking for a medium-light switch with a tactile feedback and a clacky sound profile, the Glimp switch would be a great choice for a substantial and satisfying typing experience. On the other hand, if you prefer a light switch with a smooth tactile bump and a neutral sound signature, the WS Light Tactile switch would be a suitable option for a gentle and responsive typing feel. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preference for actuation force, sound profile, and typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
