United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Glimp vs. Wuque Studio WS Red

An in-depth look at the KTT Glimp and the Wuque Studio WS Red switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options for those seeking a smooth and satisfying typing experience are the KTT Glimp and the Wuque Studio WS Red. The Glimp switch is a linear option that strikes the perfect balance for individuals who desire a substantial typing experience without overwhelming resistance. With its tactile feedback, comfortable actuation force, and slightly clacky sound profile, the Glimp switch offers a responsive and enjoyable typing feel. On the other hand, the WS Red switch features a double-stage spring that provides a bouncy and responsive typing experience. While it retains a familiar sound signature, it offers a heavier actuation force, adding a touch of weight to each keystroke and delivering a satisfying and substantial typing feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities so you can best decide on the perfect switch for your needs.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

67g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.80 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

18mm spring

Spring

22mm double-stage spring

Housing materials

The KTT Glimp and the Wuque Studio WS Red have different materials used for their top housings. The Glimp features a polycarbonate top housing, known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The polycarbonate is a relatively stiffer plastic, which results in a more clear and resonant sound. Additionally, its translucency makes it ideal for RGB lighting. On the other hand, the WS Red's top housing is made of nylon, a classic switch housing material. Nylon provides a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its relatively softer plastic, which absorbs more sound and creates a duller, rounder sound. Therefore, the Glimp and the WS Red offer different sound profiles, with the Glimp providing a crisp and resonant sound, while the WS Red offers a deeper and fuller sound.

The bottom housings of both the Glimp and the WS Red are made of nylon, contributing to a similar typing experience. Nylon is known for its ability to elicit a deeper and fuller sound profile. Being a relatively softer plastic, nylon absorbs more sound than harder plastics, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. Therefore, when pressing down on both switches, users will experience a similar sound and feel. The bottom housing has a larger impact on the bottom-out sound and feel, and since both switches use nylon for their bottom housing, the typing experience will have a consistent characteristic across both.

While the top and bottom housings play different roles in switch sound and feel, both the Glimp and the WS Red offer similar qualities in the typing experience. The Glimp's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper and crisper sound when letting go of a key, while the WS Red's nylon top housing provides a deeper and fuller sound. This difference in material affects the sound profile when a key is released. However, the bottom housings, made of nylon in both switches, contribute to a consistent deep and full sound when pressing down on the keys. Ultimately, users can expect a satisfying typing experience from both switches, with subtle differences in sound when releasing the keys.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Red linear switch, there are some notable differences. The Glimp has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, making it a medium-light switch. On the other hand, the WS Red switch has an unknown actuation force, but a bottom out force of 67 grams, categorizing it as a medium-heavy switch.

Considering weight, some individuals prefer a lighter switch as it allows for longer typing periods, making it suitable for work or extended gaming sessions. In this case, the Glimp switch's actuation and bottom out forces provide a balanced and comfortable experience. However, for those who desire a stronger push feel and a more substantial typing experience, switches with heavier forces are preferred. The WS Red switch, with its higher bottom out force, would be more suitable for individuals seeking this type of tactile feedback.

It is worth noting that while the specific actuation force for the WS Red switch is unavailable, it is still possible to make comparisons based on the available information. The Glimp switch falls in the medium-light category, indicating that the actuation force of the WS Red switch is likely to be heavier, in alignment with its medium-heavy bottom out force.

In summary, comparing the actuation and bottom out forces of these switches reveals that the KTT Glimp switch is lighter, offering a medium-light typing experience, while the Wuque Studio WS Red switch is heavier, providing a medium-heavy tactile feedback. Depending on individual preferences and typing requirements, users can select the switch that best meets their needs.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distance of the KTT Glimp linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Red linear switch, it is clear that there is a slight difference between the two. The Glimp has a travel distance of 4.0 mm, while the WS Red has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.8 mm. The Glimp's 4.0 mm travel distance falls into the more traditional range, offering a balance between depth and responsiveness. On the other hand, the WS Red's 3.8 mm travel distance is slightly shallower, which can be preferred by gamers looking for faster response times. Both switches offer similar experiences in terms of travel distance, with the Glimp offering a slightly longer press and the WS Red providing a slightly shorter and potentially more responsive feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference, with the Glimp appealing to those who desire a touch more depth and the WS Red catering to individuals seeking quicker responses.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Glimp has an MSRP of $3.84 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Glimp for $3.45.

The Wuque Studio WS Red comes in at $3.50 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the KTT Glimp linear switch is best described as clacky. This means that when you press the switch, you can expect a sharp and snappy sound that is crisp, bright, and percussive. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Red linear switch's sound quality is unknown or not mentioned in the available information. It is important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps used. With this in mind, if you want a similar sound to the Glimp switch, you can pair the WS Red switch with keycaps and a keyboard board that enhance its clacky sound profile.

In terms of feel, the KTT Glimp switch is described as creamy. This means that it offers a smooth and buttery typing experience, similar to gliding your fingers effortlessly across the keys. This sensation can be attributed to factors such as lubrication applied at the factory or specific materials used in the switch. Additionally, the Glimp switch is also described as mild, offering a more gentle typing experience with qualities that fall within a safe middle-ground zone. Unfortunately, there is no specific description provided for the feel of the Wuque Studio WS Red switch in the available information.

Considering the information provided, the KTT Glimp and Wuque Studio WS Red switches differ in their subjective qualities. The Glimp switch is known for its clacky sound profile and creamy, mild feel. On the other hand, the WS Red switch's sound quality and feel are not mentioned in the available information. While it is difficult to make direct comparisons without specific information on the WS Red switch, it is possible to achieve similar results in terms of sound by pairing the WS Red switch with compatible keycaps and keyboard board that enhance its clacky sound profile. As for feel, it is unclear how the WS Red switch compares to the creamy and mild feel of the Glimp switch.

Conclusion

To sum up, if you are looking for a medium-light switch that offers a satisfying and responsive typing experience without overwhelming resistance, the KTT Glimp linear switch is the way to go. It strikes a perfect balance for those seeking a substantial typing experience with its tactile feedback and comfortable actuation force. Additionally, its clacky sound profile adds an enjoyable auditory element to your typing sessions. On the other hand, if you prefer a bouncy and responsive typing experience with a heavier actuation force that adds a touch of weight to each keystroke, the Wuque Studio WS Red linear switch is the better option. With its double-stage spring and classic material blend, it delivers a satisfying and substantial typing feel while retaining a familiar sound signature. Ultimately, your choice between these two switches will depend on your personal preferences for typing experience and sound profile.

Mentioned in this article