TTC Gold Pink vs. Invyr Holy Panda
An in-depth look at the TTC Gold Pink and the Invyr Holy Panda switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between the TTC Gold Pink linear switch and the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch, it all comes down to personal preference and typing style. The Gold Pink boasts a feather-light 37g actuation force, making it ideal for those who prefer a fast and effortless typing experience. Its clacky sound offers a satisfying level of feedback, making it perfect for rapid typing or gaming. On the other hand, the Holy Panda is known for its sharp tactility and satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke. It provides a blend of pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance that appeals to tactile enthusiasts. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
Both the TTC Gold Pink and the Invyr Holy Panda utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to polycarbonate's stiffness, which enhances clarity and resonance in the sound produced by the switch. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches intended for RGB lighting. The similarities in top housing material between these two switches suggest that users can expect comparable sound characteristics and aesthetics when using either the Gold Pink or Holy Panda.
On the other hand, the Gold Pink's nylon bottom housing offers a deeper and fuller sound profile when typing, as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound than harder plastics. This results in a duller and rounder sound that enhances the overall typing experience. Similarly, the Holy Panda also features a nylon bottom housing with the same sound-enhancing qualities, providing a consistent typing experience between the two switches. The shared use of nylon for the bottom housing ensures that users will experience a similar level of sound depth and texture regardless of which switch they choose.
When the top and bottom housings differ in material, as is the case with the Gold Pink and Holy Panda, the qualities brought by each material are divided between the top and bottom of the switch. This distribution impacts the sound and feel of the switch when typing and releasing keys. The bottom housing, whether made of nylon or polycarbonate, plays a significant role in the bottom-out sound and overall typing experience, while the top housing has a greater influence on the sound produced when releasing a key. This distinction highlights the importance of both top and bottom housing materials in determining the overall sound profile and typing feel of a switch.
Weight
When comparing the actuation and bottom out forces of the TTC Gold Pink linear switch and the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch, it is evident that the Gold Pink is lighter in both aspects. The Gold Pink has an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, whereas the Holy Panda has an unknown actuation force and a bottom out force of 67 grams. The Gold Pink provides a lighter typing experience, making it suitable for those who prefer a more effortless keystroke. In contrast, the Holy Panda offers a more substantial typing experience due to its heavier bottom out force. Each switch caters to a different preference, with the Gold Pink being ideal for longer typing sessions and the Holy Panda providing a more pronounced tactile feedback for those seeking a heavier push feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference based on the desired typing experience.
Travel distance
Both the TTC Gold Pink linear switch and the Invry Holy Panda tactile switch have the same travel distance of 4mm, meaning that users can expect a similar key feel in terms of travel distance when using either switch. This allows for consistent typing experience and muscle memory development across both switch types. Overall, both switches provide a standard travel distance that is neither too short nor too long, striking a balance that is comfortable for most users. This similarity in travel distance ensures that users can achieve similar results in terms of typing speed and comfort regardless of which switch they choose to use.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The TTC Gold Pink has an MSRP of $4.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Gold Pink for $4.28.
The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Gold Pink linear switch is described as offering a clacky sound that provides a satisfying level of feedback, while the Holy Panda tactile switch is known for producing a bright "clack" with each keystroke. Sound is also influenced by factors such as the keyboard and keycaps used, so individual preferences may vary.
When it comes to feel, the Gold Pink linear switch is often described as feathery due to its exceptionally light actuation force, providing a comfortable typing experience with reduced finger fatigue. On the other hand, the Holy Panda tactile switch is characterized as sharp, offering a highly pronounced tactile bump that creates a distinct and immersive typing sensation. Again, personal preference will play a significant role in determining which type of switch feels best for each individual.
Considering all the available information, it is evident that the Gold Pink linear switch excels in providing a light and lively typing experience with a clacky sound, perfect for those who prefer a swift and effortless typing or gaming experience. In contrast, the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch stands out for its sharp tactility, offering a bright and satisfying "clack" with each keystroke, appealing to tactile switch enthusiasts seeking a highly responsive and tactile typing experience. Ultimately, both switches have unique qualities that cater to different typing preferences, and choosing between them will depend on whether you prioritize lightness and speed or pronounced feedback and tactile feel in your mechanical keyboard switches.
Conclusion
To sum up, when choosing between the TTC Gold Pink linear switch and the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch, consider the type of typing experience you prefer. If you value a light and effortless typing experience with a fast actuation force, then the Gold Pink would be the ideal choice for you, especially if you are into rapid typing or gaming. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with sharp tactile feedback and a medium-heavy actuation force, then the Holy Panda would be more suitable for you, especially if you enjoy a pronounced tactile bump with each keystroke. Ultimately, both switches have their own unique characteristics and it comes down to personal preference when deciding which one best fits your typing style and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
