United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Bsun Guyu vs. Wuque Studio WS Onion

An in-depth look at the Bsun Guyu and the Wuque Studio WS Onion switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When considering mechanical keyboard switches, two standout options to explore are the BSUN Guyu linear switches and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switches. The BSUN Guyu switches are celebrated for their unique auditory experience, with all-POM housings enhancing acoustics and a long pole stem creating a bright, crisp bottom-out sound. Their medium weight and super-smooth keystrokes, courtesy of the high-grade UPE stem, provide effortless typing sessions with resonant feedback, resulting in a distinctive sound signature that combines depth and clarity. On the other hand, the WS Onion switches boast a polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing for a buttery smooth keystroke feel that is deeply satisfying. Known for their crisp, responsive feel and neutral sound profile, these switches offer a different typing experience compared to the BSUN Guyu. While the Guyu is labeled as clacky, creamy, frictionless, polished, silky, snappy, the WS Onion is categorized as neutral, buttery, polished. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences, so it's important to delve deeper beyond generalities to determine which switch best suits your typing needs.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

63.5g

Pre-travel

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

UPE

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

21mm spring

Spring

WS CL635 Gold Plated Stainless Spring

Housing materials

The Bsun Guyu utilizes POM for both its top and bottom housing, resulting in a sound profile that is deep and muted. This creates a unique typing experience that may appeal to those who prefer a quieter keyboard. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS Onion features a polycarbonate top housing and a nylon bottom housing. The polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, while the nylon bottom housing produces a deeper and fuller sound. This combination of materials offers a balance between crispness and depth in the overall sound of the switch.

Aesthetically, the Bsun Guyu and the Wuque Studio WS Onion differ in terms of their housing materials. The translucent nature of polycarbonate used in the WS Onion's top housing makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting, as it allows for the illumination to shine through. In comparison, the opaque POM material used in the Guyu switch provides a more understated look. Additionally, the choice of housing material can also affect the feel of typing on the keyboard. The softer nylon bottom housing of the WS Onion may provide a different tactile experience compared to the stiffer POM material of the Guyu.

While the Bsun Guyu and the Wuque Studio WS Onion have distinct housing materials, they both offer unique sound profiles that cater to different preferences. The deep and muted sound of the POM housing in the Guyu provides a quieter typing experience, while the combination of polycarbonate and nylon in the WS Onion offers a balance between sharpness and fullness in sound. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches may come down to personal preference in terms of both sound and aesthetics. Whether you prefer a deeper, more muted sound or a sharper, crisper sound, both the Guyu and the WS Onion offer excellent options to consider.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Bsun Guyu linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch, it is evident that the Guyu is lighter overall. The Guyu has an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, while the WS Onion's actuation force is unknown and has a bottom out force of 63.5 grams, making it medium-heavy. The lighter actuation and bottom out force of the Guyu may appeal to those who prefer a more effortless typing experience for longer periods of time, such as during work or gaming sessions. On the other hand, the WS Onion's heavier bottom out force may cater to individuals seeking a more substantial typing feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches depends on the user's preference for actuation and bottom out force, with the Guyu being lighter and the WS Onion being heavier in comparison.

Travel distance

The Bsun Guyu linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, which is shorter than the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch with a travel distance of 4 mm. The Guyu offers a more shallow and quicker key press response, making it ideal for gamers looking for faster input. On the other hand, the WS Onion provides a slightly deeper key press, which may feel more satisfying for those who prefer a more substantial travel distance. Both switches offer different experiences based on personal preference, with the Guyu being the shorter option and the WS Onion being the longer option in terms of travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference for key press depth and responsiveness.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Bsun Guyu has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Guyu for $3.70.

The Wuque Studio WS Onion has an MSRP of $7.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the WS Onion for $5.53.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

The BSUN Guyu linear switch is renowned for its clacky and resonant sound profile, creating a distinct typing rhythm with a bright and crisp bottom-out sound. This auditory experience is enhanced by the switch's POM housing and long pole stem, providing a balance of depth and clarity that sets it apart. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch offers a neutral sound profile, suited for various typing preferences and environments. Both switches achieve a smooth keystroke feel, with the Guyu being described as creamy, frictionless, polished, and silky, while the WS Onion is noted for its buttery and polished feel. These qualities ensure a satisfying typing experience, whether you prefer the distinctive sound signature of the Guyu or the versatile feel of the WS Onion. Ultimately, choosing between these two switches will depend on your personal preference for sound and feel, as both offer a high-quality typing experience with unique characteristics.

Conclusion

To sum up, when choosing between the Bsun Guyu linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch, consider your preferences for sound and feel. If you are looking for a unique auditory experience with a bright and crisp bottom-out sound, as well as super-smooth keystrokes, then the Guyu switch might be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a buttery smooth keystroke feel with a neutral sound profile, then the WS Onion switch may be more suitable for your typing needs. Ultimately, your decision should be based on whether you prioritize a distinctive sound signature or a smooth and satisfying typing sensation. Both switches have their own strengths, so choose the one that aligns best with your preferences.

Mentioned in this article