Invyr Holy Panda vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2
An in-depth look at the Invyr Holy Panda and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Invyr Holy Panda, a tactile switch, to the Jerrzi Lotus V2, a linear switch, there are notable differences in their key features. The Holy Panda is renowned for its sharp tactility, providing a satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke. Its pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance make it a favorite among tactile switch enthusiasts due to its [Accented', 'Invigorating', 'Sharp', 'Snappy'] characteristics. On the other hand, the Lotus V2 lacks a standout feature but offers a smooth and consistent keystroke experience. Choosing between these switches boils down to personal preference and typing style. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Invyr Holy Panda and the Jerrzi Lotus V2, we can see that both switches feature unique qualities that contribute to their sound profiles. The Holy Panda's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound due to its stiffness, while the Lotus V2's POM top housing produces a deeper and more muted sound. On the other hand, the Holy Panda's nylon bottom housing offers a deeper and fuller sound, thanks to its softer plastic composition, while the Lotus V2's POM bottom housing contributes to a similarly pleasing and deep sound profile.
Despite their differences, both switches ultimately strive to provide a satisfying typing experience with their housing materials. The Holy Panda's combination of polycarbonate and nylon housing results in a mix of sharpness and depth in sound, creating an overall balanced typing experience. Similarly, the Lotus V2's use of POM for both top and bottom housing ensures a consistent and unique sound profile that is both deep and pleasing to the ear. Both switches aim to cater to different preferences by offering distinct sound profiles that cater to a variety of typing styles.
In terms of design, the choice of housing materials plays a crucial role in determining the overall sound and feel of the switches. The polycarbonate top housing of the Holy Panda allows for a clear and resonant sound, particularly suited for those who enjoy a sharper typing experience. In contrast, the POM top housing of the Lotus V2 provides a more muted and deeper sound, appealing to those who prefer a softer typing feel. Similarly, the nylon bottom housing of the Holy Panda contributes to a fuller sound profile, while the POM bottom housing of the Lotus V2 maintains a consistent and deep typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference in terms of sound and feel.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, one significant difference is in their actuation force. The Holy Panda has an actuation force of None grams, while the Lotus V2 has a lighter actuation force of 45 grams. This means that the Lotus V2 would require less force to trigger a keystroke compared to the Holy Panda. However, when looking at the bottom out force, the Holy Panda has a bottom out force of 67 grams, which is medium-heavy, while the bottom out force of the Lotus V2 is unavailable. In terms of weight preferences, those who prefer a lighter touch may lean towards the Lotus V2 for longer typing periods or gaming sessions, while those who enjoy a more substantial typing experience may opt for the Holy Panda with its heavier bottom out force. Both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences in terms of actuation force and bottom out force.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, it is evident that the Holy Panda has a longer travel distance at 4 mm compared to the Lotus V2, which has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. The Holy Panda offers a more traditional typing experience with its greater travel distance, allowing for a deeper key press, while the Lotus V2 provides a slightly shorter travel distance for those who prefer a quicker response. Gamers may find the Lotus V2 to be more favorable for its faster actuation due to the shorter travel distance, but others may find the Holy Panda to be more satisfying for its more pronounced key press. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference in terms of travel distance and typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Holy Panda tactile switch is best known for its satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke, providing a unique acoustic resonance that is highly sought after by tactile switch enthusiasts. On the other hand, the sound profile of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is not specified, making it difficult to compare their sound qualities directly. However, keep in mind that the sound produced by a switch can also vary depending on factors such as the keyboard layout and keycaps used.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Holy Panda is revered for its distinctive sharp tactility, offering a pronounced feedback that is described as invigorating and sharp. This creates a tactile typing experience that is both responsive and immersive, perfect for those who enjoy a tactile switch with a prominent tactile bump. As for the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, specific details about its feel are not provided, making it challenging to make a direct comparison with the Holy Panda in terms of tactile feedback and typing experience.
In conclusion, the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch stands out for its unique sound profile characterized by a satisfying "clack" and distinctive sharp tactility that provides a highly tactile typing experience. While the sound and feel of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch are not explicitly described, it is essential to consider personal preferences and typing style when choosing between switches. Overall, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences, and experimenting with different switches on your keyboard can help you find the perfect fit for your typing needs.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, consider your personal preferences and typing style. If you enjoy a medium-heavy bottom out force, sharp tactility, pronounced feedback, and a bright "clack" sound with each keystroke, the Holy Panda may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with no specified bottom out force and are looking for a switch with unique qualities yet to be defined, the Lotus V2 might be worth exploring. Ultimately, the decision comes down to what feel and sound you are looking for in a mechanical keyboard switch. As we have seen, each switch offers its own distinctive characteristics that cater to different typing preferences. Choose wisely based on what will provide the best typing experience for you.
Mentioned in this article
