Invyr Holy Panda vs. KTT Mint
An in-depth look at the Invyr Holy Panda and the KTT Mint switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Invyr Holy Panda, a tactile switch, to the KTT Mint, a linear switch, there are some key differences to consider. The Holy Panda is renowned for its sharp tactility, providing a satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke. On the other hand, the Mint offers a smooth linear experience with a poppy thockiness thanks to its long pole stem. While the Holy Panda is categorized as 'Accented', 'Invigorating', 'Sharp', and 'Snappy', the Mint falls into the categories of 'Low-pitched', 'Neutral', 'Mild', and 'Polished'. Each switch has its own unique qualities that cater to different preferences and typing styles. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
53g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
15mm spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Invyr Holy Panda and the KTT Mint, both switches utilize polycarbonate for the top housing, leading to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This material is known for its stiffness, which contributes to a clear and resonant sound experience. Additionally, the transparency of polycarbonate is useful for switches designed for RGB lighting. However, while both switches share this common material for the top housing, their differences lie in the bottom housing material.
The Holy Panda features a nylon bottom housing, which is known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to polycarbonate. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound experience. This split in housing materials allows for a unique typing experience, with the qualities of the bottom housing coming into play when pressing down on the switch. In contrast, the Mint also utilizes a nylon bottom housing, offering a similar typing experience with a deeper and fuller sound profile as a result of the softer plastic absorbing more sound.
Both switches showcase the importance of housing materials in creating a distinct sound profile during typing. While their top housings share the qualities of polycarbonate for a sharper and crisper sound, the difference in bottom housing materials contributes to the overall typing experience and sound output. Whether it be the nylon bottom housing of the Holy Panda or the Mint, typists can expect a deeper and fuller sound due to the absorption qualities of the softer material. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will come down to personal preference in sound profile and typing feel.
Weight
In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the KTT Mint linear switch, it is clear that the Holy Panda is heavier overall. The Holy Panda has a bottom out force of 67 grams, which is heavier than the Mint's 53 grams. The actuation force of the Holy Panda is unknown, but given its higher bottom out force, it can be assumed to be heavier than the Mint's 45 grams. The Mint, on the other hand, has a lighter actuation force and bottom out force, making it more suitable for those who prefer a lighter typing experience. The Holy Panda, with its heavier forces, is better suited for those who prefer a more substantial typing feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for typing force and experience.
Travel distance
The travel distance of the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the KTT Mint linear switch is the same, both measuring at 4 mm. This means that pressing down on a key with either switch will result in a similar feeling in terms of travel distance. Both switches offer a satisfying amount of travel for users who prefer a moderate distance when typing or gaming. This similarity in travel distance makes them equally comfortable options for those looking for switches with a standard amount of keypress travel. Overall, the Holy Panda and Mint switches provide a consistent typing experience in terms of travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.
The KTT Mint comes in at $2.91 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Holy Panda tactile switch is known for its bright and satisfying "clack" with each keystroke, providing a unique blend of pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance. On the other hand, the KTT Mint linear switch is described as having a low-pitched sound profile, offering a more bass-heavy and mellow tone compared to higher-pitched switches. Both switches provide their own distinct auditory experience, with the Holy Panda offering a more pronounced and tactile sound, while the Mint provides a smoother and quieter typing experience.
Moving on to feel, the Holy Panda switch is celebrated for its sharp tactility, providing a snappy and invigorating typing sensation with a distinct tactile bump. The switch is known for its accented and sharp tactile feedback, creating an immersive and responsive typing experience. In contrast, the KTT Mint linear switch offers a mild and polished typing experience, with a gentle and approachable feel that is smooth and refined. The Mint switch provides a light and fleeting typing feel, making it suitable for users seeking a comfortable and less pronounced tactile experience.
In conclusion, the Holy Panda tactile switch and the KTT Mint linear switch offer unique and distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Holy Panda excels in providing a bright and pronounced tactile sound with sharp feedback, while the Mint switch offers a smoother and quieter typing experience with a gentle and polished feel. Both switches cater to different preferences and typing styles, ensuring that users can find a switch that suits their individual needs. Ultimately, choosing between the Holy Panda and the KTT Mint will depend on whether you prefer a more tactile and pronounced typing experience or a smoother and quieter feel.
Conclusion
In closing, when choosing between the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the KTT Mint linear switch, consider the weight of the bottom out force. If you prefer a medium-heavy feel, the Holy Panda with its 67-gram bottom out force might be more to your liking. Additionally, if you enjoy sharp tactility and a bright "clack" sound with each keystroke, the Holy Panda is a great choice for tactile enthusiasts. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter touch, the Mint with its 53-gram bottom out force is a good option. The Mint offers a smooth linear typing experience with a light and fleeting feel, perfect for those who enjoy a poppy thockiness. Ultimately, the decision between these switches will come down to your personal preference for weight, tactility, and sound.
Mentioned in this article
