Invyr Holy Panda vs. Haimu Neo White
An in-depth look at the Invyr Holy Panda and the Haimu Neo White switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
The Invyr Holy Panda and the Haimu Neo White are two distinct mechanical keyboard switches that cater to different preferences in typing experience. The Holy Panda is renowned for its sharp tactility, providing a satisfyingly bright "clack" with every keystroke, making it a favorite among tactile switch enthusiasts. On the other hand, the Haimu Neo White stands out for its medium weight and smooth actuation, thanks to the rare use of a Ly stem. While the Holy Panda is categorized as 'Accented', 'Invigorating', 'Sharp', and 'Snappy', the Neo White is categorized as 'Mild' and 'Neutral'. Choosing between these switches ultimately depends on whether you prefer a pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance with the Holy Panda, or a smooth and satisfying typing experience with the Neo White. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
Ly
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Double-staged spring
Housing materials
Both the Invyr Holy Panda and the Haimu Neo White feature polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to the stiffness of the material. This makes both switches ideal for users looking for a more clear and resonant sound experience. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate allows for RGB lighting to shine through, adding a visually appealing element to the switches. Despite these similarities, the different color options available for the Neo White may offer users more customization options compared to the Holy Panda.
In terms of the bottom housing material, both the Holy Panda and the Neo White utilize nylon, known for producing a deeper and fuller sound profile. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound than harder plastics, resulting in a duller and rounder sound that may appeal to users looking for a quieter typing experience. This consistent use of nylon in the bottom housing of both switches ensures that users can enjoy a consistent sound profile across their typing experience, regardless of the switch they choose.
While both switches offer similar sound profiles due to their shared use of polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing, the slight differences in color options and potentially the overall design may be worth considering for users looking to personalize their keyboard setup. Ultimately, both the Invyr Holy Panda and the Haimu Neo White provide quality housing materials that contribute to a satisfying typing experience, making them both solid choices for keyboard enthusiasts.
Weight
The Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the Haimu Neo White linear switch both have different actuation and bottom out forces. The Holy Panda has a bottom out force of 67 grams, making it a medium-heavy switch, while the Neo White has a bottom out force of 58 grams, putting it in the medium category. Both switches have an actuation force of None grams, meaning they will actuate without any specific force needed. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, the Neo White would be the better option, while those who prefer a heavier typing feel may lean towards the Holy Panda. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style.
Travel distance
The Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Haimu Neo White linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm. This means that the Holy Panda has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Neo White. While both switches fall within the traditional range of travel distances, with the Holy Panda being on the longer side and the Neo White being on the shorter side, they cater to different preferences. Gamers who prioritize faster response times may prefer the Neo White due to its shorter travel distance, while those who enjoy a more substantial key press may opt for the Holy Panda. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference in terms of travel distance and typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.
The Haimu Neo White comes in at $2.70 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Holy Panda is known for its sharp tactility that produces a satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke, creating a unique and distinct sound profile. On the other hand, the Neo White is described as having a neutral sound profile, suitable for a wide range of users and purposes due to its moderate actuation force and sound level. Depending on other factors such as the keyboard and keycaps used, both switches will offer different auditory experiences.
When it comes to feel, the Holy Panda is known for its accented, invigorating, sharp, and snappy tactile feedback, creating an immersive typing sensation with each keypress. The pronounced feedback, moderate to firm actuation force, and reactive feel of the Holy Panda make it a popular choice among tactile switch enthusiasts. In contrast, the Neo White provides a milder typing experience, offering a more gentle feel compared to switches with more pronounced characteristics. The use of a Ly stem in the Neo White contributes to a smooth actuation and overall satisfying typing experience.
In conclusion, the Invyr Holy Panda and the Haimu Neo White switches offer unique and distinct qualities that cater to different preferences in mechanical keyboard switches. The Holy Panda excels in sharp tactility and pronounced feedback, providing a bright and immersive typing experience, while the Neo White stands out for its smooth actuation and medium weight, offering a more gentle and approachable typing feel. Depending on whether you prefer a sharper, more tactile experience or a smoother, more neutral feel, both switches provide quality options for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts looking for a satisfying typing experience.
Conclusion
In closing, when considering whether to choose the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch or the Haimu Neo White linear switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preferences and typing style. If you are looking for a switch with pronounced feedback, sharp tactility, and a satisfyingly bright sound, then the Holy Panda may be the best choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a smoother and more gentle typing experience with a slightly reduced total travel, then the Neo White may better suit your needs. Both switches have their own unique qualities and advantages, so take into account your preferences for actuation force, sound profile, and tactile feel when making your decision. Ultimately, the choice between the Holy Panda and the Neo White will depend on what typing experience you are looking for.
Mentioned in this article
