United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Invyr Holy Panda vs. Gateron Type L

An in-depth look at the Invyr Holy Panda and the Gateron Type L switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Invyr Holy Panda and the Gateron Type L stand out as popular choices for enthusiasts. The Holy Panda is renowned for its sharp tactility, providing a satisfying "clack" with each keypress, making it a favorite among tactile switch enthusiasts. On the other hand, the Gateron Type L offers a lighter touch and a sound signature that leans towards the deeper end of the spectrum, appealing to those who prefer a more subdued typing experience. Both switches have unique characteristics that cater to different preferences and typing styles. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

38g

Bottom-out force

67g

Bottom-out force

45g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Housing materials

In comparing the housing materials of the Invyr Holy Panda and the Gateron Type L, it is evident that they both utilize nylon for their bottom housing. Nylon is known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer texture that absorbs more sound. This similarity means that both switches will offer a similar tactile feel and quiet bottom-out sound when typing. However, the Holy Panda's polycarbonate top housing will provide a sharper and crisper sound profile, while the Type L's nylon top housing will result in a duller and rounder sound. This contrast signifies a difference in the sound characteristics produced by each switch.

Additionally, the use of polycarbonate in the Holy Panda's top housing allows for enhanced RGB lighting effects due to its translucency, making it ideal for users who appreciate customizable aesthetics. On the other hand, the Gateron Type L's nylon top housing, while lacking in translucency, offers a classic switch housing material that contributes to a deeper sound profile. This difference in material choice not only affects the sound produced by the switches but also caters to different preferences among users looking for specific features in their mechanical keyboards.

Overall, the choice between the Invyr Holy Panda and the Gateron Type L boils down to personal preference regarding sound profile and aesthetic appeal. While both switches share a nylon bottom housing for a similar typing experience, the differing top housing materials result in distinct sound characteristics. Whether you prioritize a sharper, clearer sound profile with RGB lighting capabilities or a deeper, fuller sound profile, each switch offers a unique typing experience tailored to individual preferences. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will depend on the user's specific desires for their mechanical keyboard setup.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch, it is evident that the Holy Panda has a heavier bottom out force of 67 grams compared to the Type L's lighter 45 grams. The actuation force of the Holy Panda is unknown, while the Type L has a light actuation force of 38 grams. Those who prefer a more substantial typing experience may lean towards the Holy Panda due to its heavier bottom out force, while those who enjoy a lighter touch may opt for the Type L. Both switches offer different levels of resistance, catering to individual preferences for typing comfort and tactile feedback. So, for those seeking similar results in terms of force, the Type L may be a closer match to the Holy Panda due to its lighter actuation force and bottom out force. Ultimately, the choice between a lighter or heavier switch will depend on personal preference and desired typing experience.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distance of the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch, it is clear that both have the same travel distance of 4 mm. This means that when you press down on a key equipped with either switch, you will experience a similar level of key travel. While the Holy Panda offers a tactile feedback, the Type L is a linear switch, providing a smoother keystroke without the tactile bump. Both switches have a relatively short travel distance, making them ideal for fast typists or gamers who prefer quick key actuation. Despite their differences in feel, the travel distance remains consistent between the two switches.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.

The Gateron Type L comes in at $4.70 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Holy Panda switch is known for its satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke, providing a pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance that is unmatched in the tactile switch realm. On the other hand, the Gateron Type L switch offers a more subdued sound profile, veering towards the deeper end of the acoustic spectrum with a dampened sound when pressed. Both switches provide unique sound signatures that can be further influenced by factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.

When it comes to feel, the Holy Panda switch is renowned for its accented and invigorating tactile feedback, offering a sharp and snappy typing experience that immerses users in an intense typing sensation. The Type L switch, on the other hand, stands out for its feathery and easy-to-press nature, requiring minimal force to activate and reducing finger fatigue during extended typing sessions. While the Holy Panda excels in providing a medium to firm actuation force with a crisp tactile bump, the Type L prioritizes lightness and comfort for prolonged use.

In conclusion, the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the Gateron Type L linear switch offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Holy Panda provides a bright and pronounced feedback with intense tactility, while the Type L delivers a more subdued sound profile and a light, comfortable typing experience. Depending on personal preferences and typing needs, users can choose between the sharp and immersive feel of the Holy Panda or the easy-to-press and feathery nature of the Type L to enhance their typing experience. Ultimately, both switches offer distinct characteristics that cater to different typing styles and preferences in the mechanical keyboard community.

Conclusion

In closing, when considering whether to choose the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch or the Gateron Type L linear switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preferences and typing style. If you enjoy a sharp tactility, pronounced feedback, and a satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke, then the Holy Panda may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force, a feathery feel that reduces finger fatigue, and a subtle sound signature that leans towards the deeper end of the acoustic spectrum, then the Type L may be the better option. Consider your typing needs and preferences carefully to make the best decision for your mechanical keyboard setup.

Mentioned in this article