Invyr Holy Panda vs. Wuque Studio WS Onion
An in-depth look at the Invyr Holy Panda and the Wuque Studio WS Onion switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to compare and contrast are the Invyr Holy Panda, a tactile switch, and the Wuque Studio WS Onion, a linear switch. The Holy Panda is known for its sharp tactility, providing a satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke. It is favored by tactile switch enthusiasts for its pronounced feedback and acoustic resonance. On the other hand, the WS Onion stands out for its buttery smooth keystroke feel, crisp and responsive touch, and neutral sound profile. While the Holy Panda is accentuated, invigorating, sharp, and snappy, the WS Onion is neutral, buttery, and polished. Ultimately, when choosing between the two switches, it is crucial to delve deeper into their characteristics to determine the best fit for your preferences and typing style.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
63.5g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
WS CL635 Gold Plated Stainless Spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Invyr Holy Panda and the Wuque Studio WS Onion, it is evident that both switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housing. This material is known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness, resonating more clearly. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that plan to incorporate RGB lighting. The similarities in their top housing material indicate that users can expect similar sound profiles and aesthetics from both switches when it comes to keystrokes and actuation.
However, when it comes to the bottom housing material, the Holy Panda features nylon while the WS Onion also utilizes nylon. Nylon is known for providing a deeper and fuller sound profile as it absorbs more sound than harder plastics, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. By using nylon for the bottom housing, both switches ensure a more impactful bottom-out sound and feel for users, creating a substantial typing experience. Despite the differences in their top housing material, the shared use of nylon for the bottom housing suggests that users can expect a consistent typing experience across both switches in terms of sound depth and feel.
It is important to note that the qualities of each housing material in a switch are split between the top and bottom housings, impacting the sound and feel differently depending on keystrokes. While the top housing material influences the sound when releasing a key, the bottom housing material has a more significant impact on the sound and feel when pressing a key down. The combination of polycarbonate and nylon in the two switches ensures that users will experience a balanced mix of crispness, depth, and resonance in their typing experience, making them both excellent choices for keyboard enthusiasts looking for a satisfying sound and feel.
Weight
The actuation force and bottom out force of the Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch differ slightly in terms of weight. The Holy Panda has a bottom out force of 67 grams, making it a medium-heavy switch. On the other hand, the WS Onion has a bottom out force of 63.5 grams, also falling into the medium-heavy category. Both switches have an unknown actuation force, making it difficult to directly compare this aspect. In general, a lighter actuation force is preferred for extended typing sessions, while a heavier force can provide a more substantial typing experience. So, for those who prefer a slightly lighter feel, the WS Onion may be the better option, while those looking for a slightly heavier typing experience may prefer the Holy Panda. Ultimately, both switches offer similar results in terms of force, providing a satisfying typing experience for users.
Travel distance
The Invyr Holy Panda tactile switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch both have a travel distance of 4 mm. This means that when you press down on a key with either of these switches, you will experience the same distance of travel from the top to the bottom. Both switches offer a consistent typing experience in terms of travel distance. This makes them equally suitable choices for those who prefer a standard travel distance for their switches. The Holy Panda and WS Onion switches are both great options for those who prioritize a specific travel distance in their mechanical keyboards.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Invyr Holy Panda has an MSRP of $12.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Holy Panda for $7.17.
The Wuque Studio WS Onion has an MSRP of $7.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the WS Onion for $5.53.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Holy Panda switch offers a satisfyingly bright "clack" with each keystroke, giving it a distinctive and pronounced auditory feedback. On the other hand, the WS Onion switch is described as having a neutral sound profile, making it suitable for various settings without being too loud or quiet. Keep in mind that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard and keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the Holy Panda switch is known for its sharp tactile bump, providing a high level of feedback with each keypress. It offers an invigorating and snappy typing experience, making it popular among tactile switch enthusiasts. On the other hand, the WS Onion switch is described as offering a buttery smooth keystroke feel that is deeply satisfying. It provides a polished and seamless typing experience, thanks to its smooth key travel and refined finish.
In conclusion, the Holy Panda and WS Onion switches offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. If you enjoy a sharp tactile bump and pronounced feedback, the Holy Panda switch would be a great choice. However, if you prefer a smooth and buttery typing experience with a neutral sound profile, the WS Onion switch would be a suitable option. Ultimately, both switches provide unique sensations that cater to different preferences, ensuring a satisfying typing experience based on personal preference and typing style.
Conclusion
To sum up, if you are looking for a switch with a pronounced tactile feedback and a sharp "clack" sound, the Invyr Holy Panda would be the ideal choice for you. Its blend of pronounced feedback and bright clack sound make it a favorite among tactile switch enthusiasts. On the other hand, if you prefer a smooth and buttery keystroke feel with a neutral sound profile, the Wuque Studio WS Onion would be the better option. With a crisp and responsive feel, the WS Onion offers a satisfying typing experience without the sharp tactility of the Holy Panda. Ultimately, your choice between the Holy Panda and the WS Onion will depend on your preference for either a tactile or linear switch, and whether you prioritize pronounced feedback or a smooth keystroke feel. Choose wisely based on your typing style and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
