United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Jerrzi Honey Bean vs. Gazzew LT

An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the Gazzew LT switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the Gazzew LT offer distinct experiences for users. The Honey Bean switches are known for their light and linear action, providing a silent typing experience that is perfect for shared spaces like offices. On the other hand, the Gazzew LT switches feature a unique lilac hue and a deep, resonant "thocky" sound with each keystroke, offering a more auditory typing experience. While the Honey Bean switches are easy-to-press and muted, the LT switches are bassy, thocky, and low-pitched. Depending on your preferences for typing feel and sound, you may lean towards the Honey Bean for its discreet and feathery typing experience, or the LT for its satisfying auditory feedback. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

42g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

N/A

Bottom-out force

65g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

N/A

Total travel

3.70 mm

Total travel

3.20 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

Ly

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Proprietary Gazzew blend

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Proprietary Gazzew blend

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

Stainless steel Korean spring

Housing materials

The Jerrzi Honey Bean and the Gazzew LT both feature unique housing materials for their top and bottom housings. The Honey Bean utilizes POM for both the top and bottom housings, which results in a pleasing and unique sound profile that is on the deeper side and relatively more muted. On the other hand, the Gazzew LT's proprietary plastic blend, known as "boba plastic," is used for both the top and bottom housings, delivering a rich and deep sound profile due to its softness. In this aspect, both switches offer a similar experience in terms of sound characteristics.

However, if we look at the differences between the two switches, we can see that the top and bottom housing materials are split between the housing components. The qualities of the bottom housing material significantly impact the bottom-out sound and feel when the switch is pressed down, while the top housing material has a more pronounced effect on the sound when the key is released. This means that for the Honey Bean, the POM bottom housing contributes more to the switch feel upon pressing, while the LT's Gazzew blend bottom housing enhances the switch sound and feel during key release.

In summary, the housing materials used in the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the Gazzew LT switches play a crucial role in the overall sound profile and feel of the switches. While the Honey Bean's POM housing offers a unique sound profile that is deep and muted, the Gazzew LT's proprietary plastic blend provides a rich and deep sound due to its softness. The split of housing materials between the top and bottom components also impacts the overall switch feel, with the bottom housing having a more significant effect on switch press and the top housing influencing key release sound. Overall, both switches offer distinct characteristics based on their housing materials, providing users with a varied typing experience.

Weight

The Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch has a lighter actuation force of 42 grams compared to the Gazzew LT linear switch, which has an unknown actuation force. However, the LT has a heavier bottom out force of 65 grams, whereas the bottom out force of the Honey Bean is unknown. This means that the Honey Bean may provide a lighter typing experience, while the LT may offer a more substantial and tactile feel when typing. Depending on personal preference, some users may prefer the lighter actuation force of the Honey Bean for longer typing sessions, while others may prefer the heavier bottom out force of the LT for a more satisfying typing experience. In terms of weight, the Honey Bean may be a lighter option compared to the LT, which could be more suitable for specific typing needs or preferences. Ultimately, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different typing styles and preferences.

Travel distance

The Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch has a travel distance of 3.7 mm, while the Gazzew LT linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.2 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, which are becoming more popular due to their appeal to gamers seeking faster response times. The Honey Bean offers a slightly longer travel distance, which may provide a more substantial key press feel for those who prefer a bit more depth in their keystrokes. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference in terms of desired key press feel and response time.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Jerrzi Honey Bean has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Honey Bean for $3.59.

The Gazzew LT comes in at $6.50 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch offers a muted and quiet typing experience, perfect for those who prefer a discreet typing environment. On the other hand, the Gazzew LT linear switch provides a bassy, thocky sound profile that adds a deep and rich tone to each key press. Both switches offer unique auditory experiences, catering to different preferences in sound levels and tones.

When it comes to feel, the Honey Bean linear switch is known for its easy-to-press and feathery feel, providing a gentle resistance that minimizes finger fatigue during long typing sessions. The Gazzew LT linear switch, while lacking specific descriptors in the provided information, is likely to offer a smooth and seamless typing experience, given its reputation for a satisfying glide with every keystroke. Both switches are designed to enhance typing comfort and responsiveness, offering a pleasant tactile feedback to users.

Overall, the Jerrzi Honey Bean and Gazzew LT linear switches each have their own unique sound and feel characteristics that cater to different preferences in mechanical keyboard switches. Whether you prefer a quiet and light typing experience with the Honey Bean or a deep and resonant thockiness with the LT, both switches offer quality performance and satisfaction. Ultimately, choosing between the two switches depends on individual preferences for sound, feel, and overall typing experience.

Conclusion

To sum up, if you are looking for a mechanical keyboard switch that offers a light and silent typing experience, perfect for office or shared environments, then the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch would be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-heavy switch with a deep and resonant sound profile, along with a smooth keystroke glide, then the Gazzew LT linear switch is the way to go. Ultimately, your decision should be based on whether you prioritize noise reduction and a feathery feel (Honey Bean) or prefer a bassy sound with a seamless typing experience (LT). Both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences, so choose the one that best aligns with your typing style and environment.

Mentioned in this article