United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U vs. HMX Lotus (Heavy)

An in-depth look at the HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U and the HMX Lotus (Heavy) switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When exploring mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U and the HMX Lotus (Heavy) both stand out as compelling linear options, yet they cater to distinct typing preferences. The Hyacinth V2U features a more traditional travel distance of 3.9mm, appealing to those who appreciate a fuller typing experience reminiscent of classic keyboards. Its unique 22mm spring offers a bounciness that promotes a satisfying tactile feel, while the nylon construction provides a softer, bassier sound that many users find pleasing. In contrast, the HMX Lotus (Heavy) embraces a medium-heavy actuation force of 62.5g, delivering a bright and resonant sound profile that enhances its super bouncy responsiveness, creating a delightful engagement with every keystroke. The Lusty Lotus switches might be the preferred choice for those who enjoy an energetic typing experience that emphasizes auditory feedback. While both switches offer their unique charm, the choice ultimately depends on your personal typing style and preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

55g

Bottom-out force

52g

Bottom-out force

62.5g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.90 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Spring

22mm single-staged spring

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U and the HMX Lotus (Heavy), a distinct contrast emerges primarily from the materials used in their respective top housings. The Hyacinth V2U features a polycarbonate top housing, known for producing a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffer plastic composition. This characteristic makes polycarbonate an excellent choice for users who prioritize clarity and resonance, especially when RGB lighting is utilized, as the translucency of polycarbonate allows for vibrant lighting effects to shine through. In contrast, the Lotus (Heavy) incorporates a nylon top housing. Nylon is softer and creates a deeper, fuller sound, absorbing more sound waves than polycarbonate, resulting in a more muted auditory experience. This fundamental difference in material translates directly into the user experience, with the Hyacinth V2U leaning toward a brighter sound profile while the Lotus Heavy offers a warmer, more rounded tone.

Both switches benefit from the use of nylon in their bottom housings, providing a shared auditory characteristic that influences the overall typing experience. In the case of both the Hyacinth V2U and the Lotus (Heavy), the nylon bottom housing contributes to a deeper sound profile, characterized by its capacity to absorb sound and deliver a muted auditory experience. As the material is consistent in both switches, users can expect a similar bottoming-out feel when typing, which adds a layer of familiarity regardless of the top housing material. The common use of nylon for the bottom housing ensures that users will experience a soft, pleasant tactile feedback when activating the switches, placing emphasis on the smoothness of each keystroke.

Ultimately, the synergy of materials used in these switches results in a contrasting yet complementary dynamic. While the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U aims for a clear and pronounced auditory signature through its polycarbonate top housing, the Lotus (Heavy) embraces the warmth and depth of sound provided by nylon. However, both switches share a similar bottom housing experience courtesy of the nylon used, thereby unifying their tactile responses. Users can choose between the two options based on their preference for sound profile; yet, they will find a layered auditory experience with similar bottom-out characteristics that could cater to diverse typing preferences. Whether one seeks the brightness of the Hyacinth V2U or the depth of the Lotus (Heavy), both switches promise a unique yet familiar feel.

Weight

The HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch and the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switch present distinct characteristics in actuation and bottom-out forces, catering to different user preferences. The Hyacinth V2U features a lighter actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom-out force of 52 grams, making it suitable for those who favor a softer touch, ideal for prolonged typing sessions or extended gaming. In contrast, the Lotus (Heavy) requires a heftier actuation force of 55 grams and a bottom-out force of 62.5 grams, appealing to users who enjoy a more substantial and tactile typing experience. While both switches provide clear feedback upon actuation, the Lotus guarantees a stronger push feel for users who prefer a firmer keystroke. In summary, the Hyacinth V2U is the lighter option that caters to comfort and endurance, whereas the Lotus (Heavy) offers a more robust experience for those who favor a stronger typing force.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch and the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switch, we find a clear distinction: the Hyacinth V2U features a travel distance of 3.9 mm, while the Lotus (Heavy) offers a shorter distance of 3.5 mm. This means that users who prefer a more responsive feel may lean towards the Lotus (Heavy) due to its shorter travel distance, making it potentially better suited for gaming and fast-paced tasks. On the other hand, the Hyacinth V2U, with its longer travel distance, may appeal to those who enjoy a more pronounced tactile feedback and deeper keystrokes. Ultimately, your choice will depend on whether you favor a quick response or a more substantial keypress experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U for $2.91.

The HMX Lotus (Heavy) has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus (Heavy) for $2.99.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In the realm of sound, the HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch offers a neutral and subdued profile, characterized by a soft and bassier sound signature due to its nylon construction. This makes it suitable for various environments, whether it's a bustling office or a quiet home setup. While the Hyacinth V2U maintains a moderate sound level, it does not overwhelm with volume, appealing to users who prefer a gentler auditory experience. In contrast, the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switch is known for its bright and resonant sound. Although the specific descriptors for the Lotus's sound profile are not mentioned, its resonant quality suggests that it will produce a more pronounced auditory feedback, making it a choice for those who enjoy a livelier typing sound.

When it comes to feel, the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U excels with its polished and silky characteristics. The switch's smooth and refined finish, possibly enhanced by factory lubing, results in minimal friction and effortless key travel. This creates a luxurious typing experience that many enthusiasts cherish. Unfortunately, the tactile qualities of the Lotus (Heavy) are not specified in the provided information, leaving a void in understanding how it might compare regarding the feeling during use. However, considering that it is described as super bouncy, it likely provides a distinctly engaging experience that contrasts with the silky smoothness of the Hyacinth V2U.

In conclusion, both the HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U and the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switches offer unique auditory and tactile experiences tailored to different preferences. While the Hyacinth V2U excels in sound control and smoothness, the Lotus (Heavy) promises a bright sound and bouncy feel, appealing to those who favor a more dynamic typing experience. Depending on your preference for sound and tactile feedback, each of these switches caters to different needs, ensuring a fulfilling mechanical keyboard experience.

Conclusion

To sum up, selecting between the HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U and the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switches ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing style. If you lean towards a more traditional typing experience with a softer, bassier sound profile and a lighter bottom out force, the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U is an excellent choice. Its fuller travel distance and polished feel make it suitable for extended typing sessions, whether for work or leisure. Conversely, if you prefer a firmer keystroke that delivers a bright, resonant sound and a bouncier feedback, the Lotus (Heavy) with its medium-heavy actuation force would be ideal. This switch is perfect for you if you enjoy a more tactile experience and find satisfaction in the weight of your keystrokes. Ultimately, both switches cater to different typing experiences, so consider what aspects are most important to you, whether that’s sound, force, feel, or a combination of these factors, and choose accordingly.

Mentioned in this article