Aflion Iceberg vs. Gateron Type S
An in-depth look at the Aflion Iceberg and the Gateron Type S switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between mechanical keyboard switches, the Aflion Iceberg and the Gateron Type S both offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The Aflion Iceberg, a linear switch, stands out for its smoothness and two-stage spring mechanism, providing a satisfying typing experience. Categorized as 'Clacky, High-pitched, Snappy, Feathery, Subtle', the Iceberg switch from Aflion showcases the quality of switches produced by this relatively new manufacturer. On the other hand, the Gateron Type S, also a linear switch, boasts a 65g bottom-out weight and a balanced sound signature that leans towards a deeper acoustic experience. Categorized as 'Neutral' and 'Subdued', the Type S switch is part of Sillyworks' "Project Rehash" line, which incorporates contemporary factory lubing techniques for a rejuvenated feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
55g
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
65g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
20mm two-stage spring
Spring
18mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The Aflion Iceberg and the Gateron Type S both utilize different housing materials in their construction, with the Iceberg featuring a polycarbonate top housing and a nylon bottom housing, while the Type S uses a nylon top and bottom housing. The use of polycarbonate in the Iceberg's top housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile compared to the fuller and deeper sound produced by the nylon used in the Type S. Additionally, the stiffness of polycarbonate leads to a more clear and resonant sound, while the softer nylon absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound in the Type S.
While both switches feature nylon in their bottom housings, the Iceberg's nylon bottom housing is described as creating a deeper and fuller sound profile, similar to the Type S's nylon bottom housing. The impact of these material differences is felt when typing on the switches, with the bottom housing playing a significant role in the bottom-out sound and feel. The top housing, on the other hand, influences the sound produced when releasing a key. This split in housing materials allows for a unique typing experience with distinct sound profiles for each switch.
Overall, the choice of housing material in a switch affects not only the sound profile but also the overall typing experience. The stiffer polycarbonate in the Iceberg's top housing creates a crisper and sharper sound, while the softer nylon in the Type S leads to a fuller and deeper sound. Both switches offer unique characteristics based on their housing materials, providing users with options to suit their preferences for sound and feel while typing. Ultimately, whether using the Iceberg with its polycarbonate top housing or the Type S with its nylon housing, users can expect a satisfying typing experience tailored to their preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Aflion Iceberg linear switch and the Gateron Type S linear switch, it is evident that the Iceberg is lighter than the Type S. The Iceberg has an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making it a lighter option overall. In contrast, the Type S has an actuation force of 55 grams and a bottom out force of 65 grams, indicating a medium-heavy feel. Some users may prefer the lighter actuation and bottom out forces of the Iceberg for longer typing or gaming sessions, while others may opt for the heavier forces of the Type S for a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the Aflion Iceberg linear switch and the Gateron Type S linear switch, we find that both switches have the same travel distance of 4 mm. This means that when pressing down on a key equipped with either of these switches, you will experience a consistent travel distance of 4 mm. As a result, the typing experience and the overall feel of the switches will be very similar, leading to comparable results in terms of key press feedback and actuation. Therefore, whether you choose the Aflion Iceberg or the Gateron Type S, you can expect a similar travel distance and typing experience with either switch.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Iceberg has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Iceberg for $3.07.
The Gateron Type S comes in at $4.70 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Aflion Iceberg linear switch is known to produce a clacky and high-pitched sound, offering a sharp and bright experience when typing. On the other hand, the Gateron Type S linear switch is described as having a neutral and subdued sound profile, providing a more moderate and dampened typing noise. Depending on personal preference, users may find the Iceberg to be more attention-grabbing while the Type S offers a quieter and more subtle typing experience.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Aflion Iceberg linear switch is praised for its snappy and feathery feel, offering a responsive and lightweight typing experience that minimizes finger fatigue. Additionally, the Iceberg switch provides a subtle resistance that is comfortable for extended typing sessions. Unfortunately, information regarding the feel of the Gateron Type S linear switch is not available. Nevertheless, based on the characteristics of the Iceberg switch, users can expect a similar level of responsiveness and comfort from the Type S linear switch.
In conclusion, the Aflion Iceberg linear switch and the Gateron Type S linear switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Iceberg switch provides a clacky, high-pitched sound and a snappy, feathery feel, the Type S switch offers a more neutral, subdued sound and a yet-to-be-determined tactile experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on personal preference for sound, feel, and typing experience. It is always recommended for users to try out different switches to find the one that suits their individual typing style and preferences.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the Aflion Iceberg linear switch and the Gateron Type S linear switch, consider the following factors. If you prefer a light bottom-out force and a smoother typing experience, the Iceberg would be a great choice, especially if you enjoy a snappy and high-pitched sound profile. On the other hand, if you prefer a weightier keystroke with a deeper and more neutral sound profile, the Type S with its medium-heavy bottom-out force would be more suitable. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for typing feel and sound. Both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences, so make sure to choose the one that aligns best with your typing style.
Mentioned in this article
