Aflion Iceberg vs. HMX Xinhai
An in-depth look at the Aflion Iceberg and the HMX Xinhai switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Aflion Iceberg and the HMX Xinhai are both exceptional options, each offering unique features and characteristics. The Iceberg by Aflion is a linear switch that boasts a satisfying smoothness and a fulfilling feel, thanks to its two-stage spring design. Known for being 'Clacky', 'High-pitched', 'Snappy', 'Feathery', and 'Subtle', the Iceberg provides a quality typing experience. On the other hand, the Xinhai by HMX is also a linear switch but stands out for its unique PA12 top housing for softer acoustics and a POM stem for a crisp, higher-pitched resonance. Categorized as 'Bouncy', 'Clacky', and 'Creamy', the Xinhai offers a blend of subtlety and precision. Both switches have their strengths, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
20mm two-stage spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
Both the Aflion Iceberg and the HMX Xinhai feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to polycarbonate being a relatively stiff plastic that leads to a more clear and resonant sound profile. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. However, while both switches share the same top housing material, the specific design and composition of each may result in subtle differences in sound and feel.
On the other hand, the Iceberg and the Xinhai have nylon bottom housings, which elicit a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to their top housings. Nylon is known for being a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, creating a duller and rounder sound. As a result, typing on switches with nylon bottom housings might feel different compared to those with polycarbonate top housings. Despite both switches using nylon for their bottom housings, the overall typing experience might vary based on the specific construction and design of each switch.
Overall, the choice of housing materials in both the Aflion Iceberg and the HMX Xinhai play a significant role in determining the sound profile and typing experience of each switch. While both switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housings and nylon for their bottom housings, the specific characteristics of each material impact the overall feel and sound of the switches differently. Whether you prefer a sharper, crisper sound profile from polycarbonate or a deeper, fuller sound from nylon, both switches offer unique typing experiences based on their housing materials.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Aflion Iceberg linear switch and the HMX Xinhai linear switch, it is evident that both switches have identical actuation and bottom out forces. Both switches require an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making them light switches in terms of force. This means that users can expect a consistent typing experience across both switches, as they will feel similar when typing. The lightweight nature of these switches makes them ideal for those who prefer a lighter feel when typing for extended periods, such as during work or gaming sessions. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will come down to other factors such as sound, smoothness, and additional features, as the actuation and bottom out forces are the same for both the Iceberg and Xinhai switches.
Travel distance
The Aflion Iceberg linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the HMX Xinhai linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. The shorter travel distance of the Xinhai may be preferred by gamers looking for faster response times, as shorter distances can lead to quicker keystrokes. On the other hand, the longer travel distance of the Iceberg may appeal to those who prefer a more substantial keypress feel. Both switches offer different tactile experiences, with the Xinhai providing a shallower press and the Iceberg offering a deeper press. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for keypress depth and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Iceberg has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Iceberg for $3.07.
The HMX Xinhai has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Xinhai for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, both the Aflion Iceberg and the HMX Xinhai linear switches are described as having a clacky sound profile, producing a sharp and snappy sound when pressed. However, the Xinhai switch is noted to have a higher-pitched resonance due to its unique PA12 top housing and POM stem, while the Iceberg switch offers a slightly lower pitch sound. Depending on personal preference, the Iceberg may provide a slightly richer and bassy sound compared to the Xinhai.
Moving on to the feel, the Iceberg switch is known for its snappy and feathery qualities, offering a responsive typing experience with a light actuation force that reduces finger fatigue. Additionally, it has a subtle resistance that maintains a light typing feel and is suitable for shared spaces. On the other hand, the Xinhai switch is described as bouncy and creamy, providing a spring-like feedback sensation and a smooth, buttery typing experience. The keys on the Xinhai have a lively feel, giving a rebound when pressed and a silky sensation while typing.
Taking into account all the available information, it is apparent that both the Aflion Iceberg and HMX Xinhai linear switches have their unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. While the Iceberg may offer a slightly richer sound and gentler feel, the Xinhai provides a higher-pitched resonance and a creamy typing experience. Ultimately, choosing between the two switches will come down to personal preference in terms of sound, feel, and overall typing experience. Rest assured, with either switch, you will be getting high-quality performance and satisfaction in your typing endeavors.
Conclusion
To sum up, when considering whether to choose the Aflion Iceberg linear switch or the HMX Xinhai linear switch, you should take into account your preferences for typing feel and sound. If you prefer a switch with a smooth and fulfilling feel, characterized by a light actuation force and a two-stage spring, then the Aflion Iceberg may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you are looking for a switch with a unique acoustics profile, featuring a softer sound and a distinctively crisp and higher-pitched resonance, then the HMX Xinhai could be the perfect fit for your typing experience. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for typing feel and sound to ensure a satisfying and enjoyable typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
