United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron Ink Box Pink vs. Outemu Dustproof Brown

An in-depth look at the Gateron Ink Box Pink and the Outemu Dustproof Brown switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Gateron Ink Box Pink linear switch to the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch, it's clear that both offer unique features catering to different preferences. The Ink Box Pink stands out for its smooth and lighter typing feel, making it a popular choice for those who prefer a high-pitched clack. On the other hand, the Dustproof Brown doesn't have specific standout features but is known for its reliability and durability. Depending on whether you prioritize a smooth typing experience or a sturdy build, you may lean towards the Ink Box Pink or Dustproof Brown. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

50g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

60g

Bottom-out force

65g

Pre-travel

1.80 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

pom

Top housing material

Proprietary INK blend

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Proprietary INK blend

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

The housing materials of the Gateron Ink Box Pink and the Outemu Dustproof Brown differ in their composition and resulting sound profiles. The Ink Box Pink features a proprietary INK blend top housing that creates a relatively high-pitched, clacky sound, while the Dustproof Brown uses a polycarbonate top housing for a sharper and crisper sound profile. On the other hand, the Nylon bottom housing of the Dustproof Brown produces a deeper and fuller sound compared to the thin and higher-pitched sound of the INK blend bottom housing of the Ink Box Pink. These differences in material composition contribute to the overall typing experience and sound feedback of each switch.

In terms of aesthetics, the use of polycarbonate in the Dustproof Brown switch allows for RGB lighting to shine through due to its translucency, whereas the INK blend housing of the Ink Box Pink does not offer the same visual appeal. However, the Nylon bottom housing of the Dustproof Brown may not have the same impact on the overall sound profile as the top housing material. Additionally, the stiffer nature of polycarbonate may result in a louder typing experience compared to the softer nylon material, which absorbs more sound and creates a duller sound profile. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on individual preferences for sound, feel, and visual aesthetics.

Despite their differences, both the Gateron Ink Box Pink and the Outemu Dustproof Brown feature unique housing materials that contribute to their distinct typing experiences. While the INK blend top housing of the Ink Box Pink produces a higher-pitched and clacky sound, the polycarbonate top housing of the Dustproof Brown delivers a sharper and crisper sound profile. Similarly, the Nylon bottom housing of the Dustproof Brown creates a deeper and fuller sound compared to the INK blend bottom housing of the Ink Box Pink. Overall, whether you prefer a thinner, clacky sound or a sharper, crisper sound, both switches offer unique qualities based on their housing materials.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gateron Ink Box Pink linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch, it is evident that the Dustproof Brown is lighter in terms of actuation force at 45 grams compared to the Ink Box Pink's 50 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Ink Box Pink requires a lighter 60 grams compared to the Dustproof Brown's heavier 65 grams. Both switches fall under the medium to medium-heavy range, offering a balance between typing comfort and tactile feedback. Individuals who prefer a lighter touch for extended typing sessions may lean towards the Ink Box Pink, while those who enjoy a more substantial typing feel may opt for the Dustproof Brown. Regardless, both switches provide a decent amount of resistance to prevent accidental keystrokes, ensuring a satisfying typing experience.

Travel distance

The Gateron Ink Box Pink linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, making it shorter than the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch, which has a travel distance of 4 mm. The difference may seem small, but it can have a noticeable impact on typing or gaming experiences. The shorter travel distance of the Ink Box Pink can provide quicker response times, preferred by gamers seeking rapid actions. On the other hand, the longer travel distance of the Dustproof Brown can offer a more satisfying keypress with a deeper feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference and whether you prioritize speed or tactile feedback in your typing or gaming experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron Ink Box Pink has an MSRP of $8.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Ink Box Pink for $7.65.

The Outemu Dustproof Brown comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Gateron Ink Box Pink linear switch is known for its clacky and high-pitched characteristics, producing a sharp and crisp sound when pressed. On the other hand, there is no specific information available about the sound of the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch. Given this information, it can be expected that the Ink Box Pink will provide a more audible typing experience compared to the Dustproof Brown.

Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Gateron Ink Box Pink linear switch is described as silky and polished, offering an exceptionally smooth typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. Unfortunately, there is no information provided about the feel of the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch. In this case, it can be inferred that the Ink Box Pink will offer a smoother and more refined typing feel compared to the Dustproof Brown.

In conclusion, based on the available information, the Gateron Ink Box Pink linear switch is likely to provide a clacky and high-pitched sound with a silky and polished typing feel. On the other hand, the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch does not have specific descriptors for sound or feel. Therefore, if you are looking for a switch with a distinct sound profile and a smooth typing experience, the Ink Box Pink may be the better option. However, without more information on the Dustproof Brown switch, the results may vary.

Conclusion

Therefore, when choosing between the Gateron Ink Box Pink linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch, consider the following factors. If you prefer a lighter typing feel with a higher-pitched clack sound, smooth and polished switch experience, and a bottom out force of 60 grams, then the Ink Box Pink may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you lean towards a medium-heavy bottom out force of 65 grams and are looking for a tactile switch without specific sound and feel preferences, the Dustproof Brown might be more suitable for your needs. Ultimately, the decision depends on your personal preference for typing experience and sound profile.

Mentioned in this article