Jerrzi Orange vs. KTT Pine
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Orange and the KTT Pine switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Jerrzi Orange and the KTT Pine mechanical keyboard switches, it is evident that both offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences. The Jerrzi Orange stands out for its clacky linear design, providing a lightweight and responsive typing experience with audible feedback. On the other hand, the KTT Pine is known for its medium-heavy feel and buttery smooth key travel, offering a more subdued and creamy typing experience. While the Orange switch may appeal to those who enjoy a lively and vibrant typing experience, the Pine switch is ideal for users seeking a smooth and effortless typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
15.5mm gold-plated spring
Housing materials
The Jerrzi Orange and KTT Pine both feature polycarbonate top housings, which provide a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to the stiffness of the plastic. This material is ideal for switches that will be used with RGB lighting, as its translucency allows for the illumination to shine through. However, the Orange's nylon bottom housing offers a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the Pine's polycarbonate bottom housing, which absorbs more sound and creates a duller and rounder sound. This difference in bottom housing material can impact the overall typing experience and sound of the switches.
While both switches share the same polycarbonate top housing material, their bottom housings vary significantly in terms of sound profile. The Orange's nylon bottom housing provides a unique typing experience with a deeper and fuller sound, while the Pine's polycarbonate bottom housing offers a sharper and crisper sound profile. The split between the qualities of the top and bottom housings affects the overall feel and sound of each switch, with the bottom housing having a more significant impact on the bottom-out sound and feel, and the top housing influencing the sound when releasing a key.
In summary, the Jerrzi Orange and KTT Pine differ in their bottom housing materials, with the Orange utilizing nylon for a deeper sound profile and the Pine opting for polycarbonate for a sharper sound. Despite both switches featuring polycarbonate top housings that provide a clear and resonant sound, the variation in bottom housing material leads to distinct typing experiences. Understanding how each housing material contributes to the sound profile is essential for keyboard enthusiasts looking to customize their typing experience based on their preferences.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Jerrzi Orange linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch, it is evident that the Orange has a lighter actuation force of 37 grams compared to the Pine's 45 grams. However, the bottom out force for the Orange is unknown, while the Pine has a heavier bottom out force of 58 grams. This means that the Pine switch requires a greater amount of force to fully press down compared to the Orange switch. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may opt for the Orange switch, as it allows for easier and quicker keystrokes. On the other hand, individuals who enjoy a more substantial and tactile typing experience may prefer the Pine switch for its heavier bottom out force. In terms of overall weight, the Orange switch would be considered lighter in terms of actuation force, while the Pine switch would be heavier in bottom out force. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Orange linear switch has a travel distance of 3.7 mm, while the KTT Pine linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. This means that the Pine switch has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Orange switch. When comparing the two, if you prefer a switch with a slightly deeper key press, the Pine switch would be the better option. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with a shorter travel distance for faster response times, the Orange switch would be the more suitable choice. Both switches fall within the range of traditional travel distances, with the Pine being slightly longer than the Orange, but both can provide a satisfactory typing experience depending on individual preferences.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Orange has an MSRP of $2.79 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Orange for $2.30.
The KTT Pine has an MSRP of $4.60 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Pine for $4.15.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The Jerrzi Orange linear switch is known for its clacky and lively sound profile, offering a crisp and audible feedback with each keystroke. On the other hand, the KTT Pine linear switch provides a bass-heavy and mellow sound, giving a deeper and richer auditory experience. Both switches offer unique sound characteristics that cater to different preferences, with the Orange being more sharp and snappy, while the Pine provides a smoother and richer tone.
When it comes to the feel of the switches, the Orange is described as feathery and easy-to-press, offering a light and effortless typing experience that reduces finger fatigue. In comparison, the Pine is known for its buttery and creamy feel, providing a smooth and uniform keystroke sensation. Both switches aim to provide a comfortable and pleasant typing experience, with the Orange focusing on light actuation force for extended typing sessions, and the Pine emphasizing smooth and fluid key presses for a seamless typing feel.
In conclusion, the Jerrzi Orange and KTT Pine linear switches offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Orange excels in delivering a clacky and vibrant sound with a light actuation force, the Pine stands out for its bass-heavy and buttery smooth feel. Depending on personal preferences for sound and typing experience, both switches provide unique options for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. Ultimately, choosing between the two would depend on whether the user prefers a livelier and responsive typing experience with the Orange, or a smoother and effortless feel with the Pine.
Conclusion
In closing, when considering whether to choose the Jerrzi Orange linear switch or the KTT Pine linear switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preferences and typing needs. If you enjoy a lightweight and clacky typing experience with crisp feedback, the Jerrzi Orange switch would be a suitable choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-heavy switch with a buttery smooth feel and a bassy sound profile, the KTT Pine switch may be more to your liking. Both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different typing styles, so it's important to consider what features are most important to you when making your decision.
Mentioned in this article
