Kailh BCP vs. Jwick Taro
An in-depth look at the Kailh BCP and the Jwick Taro switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the Kailh BCP and the Jwick Taro stand out for their unique characteristics and user experiences. The Kailh BCP, a linear switch, reimagines the classic Black Cherry Pie switches with a crafted design that eliminates the need for disassembly, making it highly convenient for users. Known for its creamy and elastic feel, the BCP offers a poppy and clacky sound profile that many typists find satisfying for both work and play. In contrast, the Jwick Taro, characterized as a tactile switch, provides a more subdued yet cozy typing experience, accentuated by its snappy tactile feedback and crisp acoustic response. For those who prefer an uninterrupted keystroke with a pronounced sound, the Kailh BCP may be the ideal choice, while the Jwick Taro appeals to users who enjoy a tactile sensation that enhances typing precision. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
52g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
63.5g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
1.40 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
20mm single-staged spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the Kailh BCP and the Jwick Taro switches, a distinct contrast arises between their top housings. The BCP utilizes a nylon top, which contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer composition. This characteristic of nylon allows it to absorb sound more effectively, resulting in a more muted acoustic experience that many typists find satisfying and less jarring. In contrast, the Taro’s top housing is made of polycarbonate, a stiffer plastic that yields a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The inherent properties of polycarbonate not only lead to a more pronounced auditory experience but also offer a favorable aesthetic when paired with RGB lighting, making it a preferred choice for those looking to enhance the visual aspects of their setup.
On the other hand, both switches share an identical material for their bottom housings: nylon. This consistency means that regardless of the differences in the top housings, users can expect a similar acoustic foundation when it comes to the bottom-out sound and tactile feedback. The nylon’s sound-absorbing qualities ensure that both the Kailh BCP and the Jwick Taro switches will have a pronounced depth in their sound profile, particularly when the key is fully pressed down. Therefore, while the top housings deliver distinct auditory experiences, the nylon bottom housing binds them together, ultimately affecting the overall typing experience in a comparable manner.
In summary, while the Kailh BCP and Jwick Taro switches exhibit a notable divergence in their top housing materials—with nylon offering a softer tonal quality and polycarbonate delivering a sharper resonance—the shared nylon bottom housing serves as a unifying element. This combination indicates that, although users will experience different sounds when pressing and releasing keys, the consistent nylon base ensures that the bottom-out feel and sound maintain a level of uniformity. As a result, both switches cater to diverse preferences, appealing to typists who value either a smoother, softer sound profile or a brighter, more resonant experience while still benefiting from the acoustic characteristics bestowed by the bottom housing.
Weight
When comparing the Kailh BCP linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch, the actuation force and bottom out force reveal distinct characteristics. The BCP switch features an actuation force of 52 grams and a bottom out force of 63.5 grams, categorizing it as medium-heavy. In contrast, the Taro switch has an unknown actuation force but has a bottom out force of 67 grams, also placing it in the medium-heavy range. While the BCP is a bit lighter than the Taro in terms of bottom out force, the lack of data on the Taro's actuation force means we can't make a direct comparison there. For users who prefer a lighter switch, the Kailh BCP might be a more comfortable choice for longer typing sessions, whereas those who favor a more substantial feel may lean toward the Taro due to its heavier bottom out force. Ultimately, selecting either switch depends on individual preferences for weight and feedback during use.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the Kailh BCP linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch, we see a distinct difference that may influence user preference. The Kailh BCP features a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Jwick Taro has a slightly longer travel distance of 3.7 mm. This makes the BCP the shorter option, catering to users who may prefer quicker actuation and responsiveness, which is particularly beneficial in gaming scenarios. In contrast, the Taro’s longer travel distance could provide a more substantial feel, appealing to those who favor a deeper, more deliberate keystroke. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on whether a user values the rapid response of shorter travel distances or the satisfying depth of a more extended actuation.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Kailh BCP has an MSRP of $5.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the BCP for $4.75.
The Jwick Taro has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Taro for $4.25.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Kailh BCP linear switch is characterized by a signature poppy and clacky sound profile that enhances the typing experience with its lively auditory feedback. This makes it particularly appealing to those who enjoy a more expressive acoustic experience while typing. On the other hand, the Jwick Taro tactile switch produces acute and crisp clacks, creating a delightful sound that strikes a balance between being satisfying and not overly loud or intrusive. This makes the Taro a versatile choice, suitable for a range of environments, from casual home use to a more formal office setting. Ultimately, both switches offer unique sound qualities, catering to different preferences in acoustic feedback.
When considering feel, the Kailh BCP switch is known for its creamy, viscous, elastic, and bouncy characteristics. This results in a fluid typing experience that many users find enjoyable, providing a sense of dynamic responsiveness as you type. In contrast, the Jwick Taro switch presents a buttery feel that emphasizes smooth and effortless keystrokes, combined with a stepped tactile response. This means that while typing on the Taro, you can expect a noticeable tactile bump that is less aggressive than what you'd find in highly tactile switches, offering a more subdued yet satisfying sensation. Thus, both switches cater to different typing preferences: the BCP is ideal for those who prioritize a bouncy, lively feel, while the Taro appeals to those who prefer softness combined with a gentle tactile response.
In conclusion, the Kailh BCP linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch each bring distinct sound and feel qualities that can cater to varying user preferences. The BCP excels with its energetic and clacky sound alongside a dynamic and bouncy feel, making it a favorite for those who enjoy a more vibrant typing experience. Conversely, the Taro offers a pleasingly crisp acoustic profile with a smooth and stepped tactile sensation, making it a versatile option for users desiring a balanced typing experience. With such differences in sound and feel, selecting between them ultimately comes down to personal preference regarding tactile engagement and auditory feedback.
Conclusion
To conclude, when deciding between the Kailh BCP linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch, consider your typing preferences and the kind of experience you want from your mechanical keyboard. If you appreciate a medium-heavy switch with a bouncy, elastic feel and a distinctive poppy sound, the BCP might be your best bet. This switch is ideal for those who enjoy a lively typing experience, whether for gaming or everyday tasks, without worrying about disassembly hassles. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch that offers a snappy tactile response along with a smoother keystroke, the Jwick Taro provides that buttery feel you're looking for with acute, crisp acoustics. This switch suits you well if you want a moderate actuation force and a balanced sound profile, making it versatile for both home and office use. Ultimately, the choice comes down to whether you value a vibrant, fluid experience or a more subtle, tactile typing sensation.