HMX KD200 vs. Durock White Lotus
An in-depth look at the HMX KD200 and the Durock White Lotus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switch, personal preference plays a crucial role, especially when comparing the HMX KD200 and the Durock White Lotus. The KD200, a linear switch, is renowned for its clacky sound profile, appealing to those who enjoy auditory feedback while typing. Its smooth keystrokes provide an uninterrupted flow, making it a fantastic option for gamers or anyone who prefers a more fluid typing experience. In contrast, the Durock White Lotus is a tactile switch that introduces a subtle yet distinct tactile bump, catering to typists who seek a balance between feedback and a calming typing experience. With its unique light column design, the White Lotus also shines brightly in aesthetic appeal, offering vibrant RGB lighting to enhance your keyboard ambiance. Each switch has its unique strengths: the KD200 for those who revel in sound and smoothness, and the White Lotus for those who value a gentle tactile feel without compromising on comfort. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the optimal switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
46g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
56g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Ly
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Modified PC & UPE Blend
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Gold-plated long spring
Housing materials
The HMX KD200 and Durock White Lotus switches exhibit distinct characteristics in their top housing materials. The KD200 utilizes a nylon top housing, renowned for its ability to create a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic composition. This results in a sound that is both dulled and rounded, allowing for a unique typing experience that prioritizes auditory comfort. In contrast, the White Lotus employs a modified blend of polycarbonate (PC) and ultra-high-performance polyethylene (UPE) for its top housing. This blend not only confers a premium feel but also alters the sound profile when typing, differentiating it from the more traditional nylon. The use of PC in the White Lotus may produce a more pronounced auditory feedback compared to the subtler tones generated by the KD200's nylon.
On the other hand, both switches share a commonality in their bottom housing as they both utilize nylon material. This consistency means that users can expect similar acoustical experiences when the key is bottomed out. The nylon bottom housing provides a reliable foundation, ensuring that the sound emitted upon key press remains characteristically deep and full, similar to the top housing performance of the KD200. Therefore, while the materials differ in their top housing, the use of nylon in the bottom for both switches aligns their bottom-out sound characteristics very closely, solidifying a familiar experience for users who value auditory depth.
In summary, the contrast between the top housing materials of the KD200 and White Lotus offers insights into how each switch may feel during use, while their matching nylon bottom housing ensures a cohesive auditory experience at the point of actuation. The interplay between the materials not only affects the sound produced when the key is released but also informs the overall typing experience. Consequently, despite the variation in top materials, users can anticipate a similar acoustic backdrop in the bottom-out sound, maintaining a sense of consistency across these two distinct switches. This shared nylon foundation allows for an appreciation of both switches, highlighting how housing materials can influence performance while still achieving similar outcomes in key response.
Weight
When comparing the HMX KD200 linear switch and the Durock White Lotus tactile switch, we can observe notable differences in both actuation and bottom out forces. The KD200 features a lighter actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, making it suitable for those who prefer a softer typing experience that allows for longer typing sessions or gaming marathons. In contrast, the White Lotus requires a slightly heavier actuation force of 46 grams and has a bottom out force of 56 grams, categorizing it as a medium-light switch. This means that while both switches have a relatively similar actuation force, the White Lotus offers a more substantial feel at the bottom, appealing to users who favor a stronger resistance when pressing keys. Ultimately, if you’re looking for a lighter switch, the KD200 will provide a more effortless experience, while the White Lotus may be more satisfying for those who enjoy a firmer push during typing.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX KD200 linear switch and the Durock White Lotus tactile switch, we find that the KD200 has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the White Lotus features a slightly longer travel distance of 4.0 mm. This means that the White Lotus switch offers a more traditional and deeper keystroke, which may appeal to users who enjoy a more substantial feel when typing. In contrast, the KD200, with its shorter 3.5 mm travel distance, provides a snappier response, making it more suitable for gamers or those who prefer quicker actuation. Thus, for those seeking a more immediate feedback and a rapid typing experience, the KD200 would be the preferred choice. On the other hand, if you value a deeper, more tactile experience, the White Lotus would be the better option for you.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX KD200 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the KD200 for $3.29.
The Durock White Lotus has an MSRP of $5.60 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the White Lotus for $4.57.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX KD200 switch stands out as the clackiest member of the HMX Film switch family, producing a sharp, pronounced noise that adds an auditory punch to each keystroke. This can make typing feel more engaging and lively for those who appreciate an audible feedback, though it might not be the best choice in quiet environments. On the other hand, the Durock White Lotus switch offers a much more subdued sound profile characterized as low-pitched and neutral. These qualities contribute to a sound that is more mellow and balanced, making it suitable for both home and office settings without causing disruptions. The contrast in auditory feedback between the two switches reflects their differing design philosophies, catering to various user preferences.
When considering feel, the KD200's characteristics are less defined in the information provided, but it generally contributes a more traditional linear typing experience, which is known for its smoothness without the tactile bump. In stark contrast, the Durock White Lotus switches present an easy-to-press, mild, and subtle typing feel that enhances comfort during extended typing sessions. The light actuation force of the White Lotus minimizes finger fatigue, allowing for a responsive yet low-impact typing experience, making it particularly favorable for discerning typists who prefer a gentle feedback. This makes the White Lotus appealing for long work hours, while the KD200 could offer a straightforward linear response ideal for those who simply prefer the lack of tactile feedback.
In conclusion, the HMX KD200 and Durock White Lotus switches offer vastly different experiences in both sound and feel. The KD200 excites with its loud, clacky sound, appealing to those who enjoy audio feedback, while the White Lotus generates a gentle, low-pitched sound profile that lends itself well to quieter environments. In terms of feel, the White Lotus features an easy, mild, and subtle tactile experience that promotes extended comfort, contrasting with the smoother ride of the KD200 typical of linear switches. Ultimately, your choice between these switches will hinge on your personal preferences regarding sound and tactile feedback, with each offering a unique approach to fulfilling typing needs.
Conclusion
To conclude, the choice between the HMX KD200 linear switch and the Durock White Lotus tactile switch ultimately hinges on your individual preferences and typing style. If you prefer a more dynamic and lively typing experience with a clacky sound profile, the KD200 is the right choice for you. Its lighter bottom-out force of 50 grams allows for quicker responses, making it an excellent option for fast-paced gaming and typing sessions where you want a bit more auditory feedback. On the other hand, if you are seeking a quieter, more refined experience that minimizes finger fatigue during long hours of work, the Durock White Lotus would be the better fit. With a medium-light force of 56 grams and a subtle tactile feedback, the White Lotus accommodates a broader audience, providing an easy-to-press feel without overwhelming distractions. Additionally, its low-pitched sound profile makes it suitable for shared environments. Ultimately, your selection should reflect whether you prefer a clackier and more engaging experience or a smooth and gentle typing sensation that enhances productivity with minimal noise.
Mentioned in this article
