Keygeek Keygeek Raw vs. Outemu Dustproof Brown
An in-depth look at the Keygeek Keygeek Raw and the Outemu Dustproof Brown switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Keygeek Raw linear switch to the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch, it's clear that both offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The Keygeek Raw stands out for its blend of Nylon, UMPE, and Silicon materials, creating a creamy yet lightweight feel that is slightly textured right out of the box. This switch is ideal for enthusiasts who enjoy hand-lubing their switches and prefer a mild, neutral, and subtle typing experience. On the other hand, the Outemu Dustproof Brown switch does not have a specific standout feature but provides a tactile typing experience. While the Keygeek Raw offers texture and a unique material blend, the Outemu Dustproof Brown excels in providing tactile feedback. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
57.5g
Bottom-out force
65g
Pre-travel
1.40 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Nylon & UPE blend
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
UMPE & Si blend
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Keygeek Raw and the Outemu Dustproof Brown, we see that the Keygeek Raw utilizes a unique Nylon & UPE blend for the top housing while the Dustproof Brown uses polycarbonate. The Nylon & UPE blend in the Keygeek Raw switches offers a different sound profile compared to the sharper, higher-pitched sound produced by the polycarbonate top housing in the Dustproof Brown switches. The translucent nature of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches with RGB lighting, whereas the exclusive blend in the Keygeek Raw switches provides a one-of-a-kind experience.
In terms of the bottom housing, the Keygeek Raw features a UMPE & Si blend while the Outemu Dustproof Brown incorporates nylon. The UMPE & Si blend in the Keygeek Raw offers its own unique sound profile, distinct from the deeper and fuller sound created by the nylon bottom housing in the Dustproof Brown switches. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound compared to the clearer and more resonant sound produced by the UMPE & Si blend.
Overall, the different housing materials utilized in the Keygeek Raw and the Outemu Dustproof Brown switches contribute to their individual sound profiles and typing experiences. While the Keygeek Raw switches offer a unique blend exclusive to their brand for both the top and bottom housing, the Dustproof Brown switches use classic materials like polycarbonate and nylon to create their own distinct typing feel and sound. Both switches have their own benefits and drawbacks, allowing users to choose based on their personal preferences for sound, feel, and aesthetics.
Weight
When comparing the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch, the actuation force and bottom out force play a significant role. The Keygeek Raw has an actuation force of None grams, while the Dustproof Brown has an actuation force of 45 grams. Both switches have a medium bottom out force, with the Keygeek Raw at 57.5 grams and the Dustproof Brown at 65 grams, making it medium-heavy. This means that the Dustproof Brown requires a lighter force to trigger a keystroke compared to the Keygeek Raw. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience for long periods of use, the Dustproof Brown may be the better choice. However, for individuals who enjoy a more tangible push feel, the Keygeek Raw may provide a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The Keygeek Raw linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, which is shorter than the 4 mm travel distance of the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch. This means that the Keygeek Raw will provide a quicker response time for users, making it a preferred choice for gamers who value speed. On the other hand, the Outemu Dustproof Brown switch offers a slightly longer travel distance, providing a more satisfying tactile feel for those who prefer a deeper keystroke. Both switches offer their own advantages, with the Keygeek Raw being shorter and faster, while the Outemu Dustproof Brown is longer and provides a more substantial key press experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the user's personal preference for travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Keygeek Keygeek Raw has an MSRP of $5.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Keygeek Raw for $3.51.
The Outemu Dustproof Brown comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch is known for its neutral sound profile, making it a versatile option suitable for various settings and user preferences. On the other hand, information about the sound profile of the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch is currently unavailable. It is important to note that the sound produced by a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard build and keycaps used.
When it comes to feel, the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch offers a textured typing experience that some users may find satisfying, as it provides a moderate level of friction when pressed. Additionally, its mild resistance and subtle typing feel make it a comfortable option for a wide range of users. Conversely, details regarding the tactile feel of the Outemu Dustproof Brown switch are not provided. The feel of a switch significantly impacts the overall typing experience, so it is essential to consider this aspect when choosing a mechanical keyboard switch.
Overall, comparing the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch based on the available information highlights the Keygeek Raw's unique material blend, textured feel, neutral sound profile, and lightweight construction. While the subjective qualities of the Outemu Dustproof Brown switch remain unknown, it is essential for newcomers to try out different switches to determine the best fit for their preferences. Ultimately, both switches are likely to offer a satisfactory typing experience, albeit with potentially different characteristics.
Conclusion
In closing, when choosing between the Keygeek Raw linear switch and the Outemu Dustproof Brown tactile switch, consider your preference for bottom out force and material blend. If you prefer a slightly lighter bottom out force and enjoy a unique material blend of Nylon, UMPE, and Silicon for a creamy yet lightweight feel, the Keygeek Raw may be the switch for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly heavier bottom out force and are looking for a tactile switch without any particular standout features in terms of material blend, the Outemu Dustproof Brown could be the better option. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your individual typing preferences and what characteristics are most important to you in a mechanical keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
