Keygeek Keygeek Raw vs. KTT Wine Red
An in-depth look at the Keygeek Keygeek Raw and the KTT Wine Red switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Keygeek Raw and KTT Wine Red mechanical keyboard switches, it's clear that they both offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. The Keygeek Raw stands out for its creamy yet lightweight feel, thanks to its Nylon and UMPE top housing combined with UMPE and Silicon bottom. On the other hand, the KTT Wine Red provides a pillowy light typing experience with a deep and rich sound profile. While the Keygeek Raw is described as textured, mild, neutral, and subtle, the Wine Red is categorized as bassy and low-pitched. If you prefer a slightly textured feel and lightweight switches, the Keygeek Raw might be the way to go. However, if you enjoy a pillowy light typing experience with a rich sound profile, the KTT Wine Red could be the ideal choice. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
44g
Bottom-out force
57.5g
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
1.40 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
No
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon & UPE blend
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
UMPE & Si blend
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Progressive spring
Housing materials
The Keygeek Raw and the KTT Wine Red both feature unique housing materials that contribute to the overall sound profile of the switches. The Keygeek Raw incorporates a Nylon & UPE blend for the top housing, while the Wine Red uses polycarbonate. The use of polycarbonate in the Wine Red results in a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile compared to the Keygeek Raw's blend. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate creates a more clear and resonant sound, especially when combined with RGB lighting due to its translucency. In contrast, the Keygeek Raw's Nylon & UPE blend may offer a slightly different sound experience with a different level of flexibility.
In terms of bottom housing, both switches differ again with the Keygeek Raw featuring a UMPE & Si blend and the Wine Red using polycarbonate. Just like with the top housing, the use of polycarbonate in the bottom housing of the Wine Red contributes to a sharper and crisper sound profile. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate plays a significant role in enhancing the overall sound experience of the switch, particularly in the bottom-out sound and feel. On the other hand, the UMPE & Si blend in the Keygeek Raw may provide a different tactile feedback when pressing down on the switch.
Overall, while the Keygeek Raw and the KTT Wine Red have different housing materials for both the top and bottom, they share similarities in terms of creating a clear and resonant sound profile. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate in the Wine Red's housing materials contributes to a higher-pitched sound, while the Keygeek Raw's blend may offer a different level of flexibility. Whether the housing materials are the same or different, both switches are optimized for creating a unique and enjoyable sound experience for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
Weight
In comparing the Keygeek Raw linear switch and the KTT Wine Red linear switch, we can see that the Keygeek Raw has a bottom out force of 57.5 grams, while the Wine Red has a slightly lighter bottom out force of 55 grams. Both switches fall under the medium category for bottom out force. However, the Keygeek Raw does not specify an actuation force, while the Wine Red has an actuation force of 44 grams, making it slightly lighter in this aspect. For those who prefer a lighter touch for longer typing sessions, the Wine Red may be the better choice due to its lower actuation force. Conversely, those who enjoy a more substantial typing experience may lean towards the Keygeek Raw's slightly heavier bottom out force.
Travel distance
The Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, while the KTT Wine Red linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In this case, the Keygeek Raw has a shorter travel distance compared to the Wine Red switch. The shorter travel distance of the Keygeek Raw may appeal to gamers looking for faster response times, while the longer travel distance of the Wine Red switch may provide a more hearty depth for those who prefer a more substantial feel when pressing down on the keys. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the type of typing or gaming experience you are looking for.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Keygeek Keygeek Raw has an MSRP of $5.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Keygeek Raw for $3.51.
The KTT Wine Red comes in at $2.71 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Keygeek Raw linear switch offers a neutral profile, suitable for a wide range of users and environments. On the other hand, the KTT Wine Red linear switch provides a bassy and low-pitched sound, giving a deeper and richer auditory experience during key presses. Ultimately, the sound produced by a switch is also influenced by factors like the keyboard's construction and the keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the Keygeek Raw switch is known for its slightly textured feel out of the box, offering a subtle yet noticeable friction when pressed. This can be preferred by some users who appreciate a bit of feedback. In comparison, information about the feel of the KTT Wine Red switch is currently unknown. Overall, the feel of a switch plays a crucial role in the typing experience and should be considered based on personal preference.
Taking all the available information into consideration, while the Keygeek Raw and KTT Wine Red linear switches have their unique characteristics in terms of sound and potentially feel, both switches ultimately offer a different typing experience. If one enjoys a neutral sound profile with a slightly textured feel, the Keygeek Raw switch would be a suitable choice. On the other hand, if a bassy and low-pitched sound profile is preferred, the KTT Wine Red switch might be the way to go. Ultimately, trying out both switches and experimenting with different setups will provide the best insight into determining which switch aligns best with individual preferences.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when deciding between Keygeek Raw linear switches and KTT Wine Red linear switches, you should consider your preference for bottom out force, sound profile, and feel. If you prefer a slightly heavier bottom out force and a creamy, lightweight feel with the option to hand-lube your switches, the Keygeek Raw switches would be a great choice. On the other hand, if you enjoy a pillowy light typing feel with a deep and rich sound profile, particularly if you prefer a bassy and low-pitched switch, the Wine Red switches may be more suitable for you. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal typing preferences and the overall typing experience you are looking for in a mechanical keyboard switch.
Mentioned in this article
