United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Keygeek Keygeek Raw vs. Wuque Studio WS Red

An in-depth look at the Keygeek Keygeek Raw and the Wuque Studio WS Red switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Keygeek Keygeek Raw and the Wuque Studio WS Red mechanical keyboard switches, it is evident that both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. The Keygeek Raw stands out for its unique material blend of Nylon, UMPE, and Silicon, providing a creamy yet lightweight typing experience with a slightly textured feel straight out of the box. On the other hand, the WS Red features a double-stage spring that offers a bouncy and responsive typing experience with a heavier actuation force, resulting in a satisfying and substantial typing feel. While the Keygeek Raw is ideal for enthusiasts who prefer hand-lubing their switches, the WS Red excels in providing a familiar sound signature and added weight to each keystroke. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

57.5g

Bottom-out force

67g

Pre-travel

1.40 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Total travel

3.80 mm

Factory lubed

No

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon & UPE blend

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

UMPE & Si blend

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Spring

22mm double-stage spring

Housing materials

The Keygeek Raw and the WS Red both feature nylon in their top housing, which results in a deeper and fuller sound profile during typing. However, the Keygeek Raw also incorporates UPE in its blend, creating a unique material exclusive to their switches. This combination may offer a different tactile experience compared to the WS Red's pure nylon top housing. The WS Red's classic nylon top housing may provide a softer feel due to its sound absorption properties, resulting in a duller and rounder sound.

On the other hand, when it comes to the bottom housing, both switches utilize nylon material. The Keygeek Raw incorporates a blend of UMPE & Si in their bottom housing, again creating an exclusive material for their switches. This unique blend may impact the overall sound and feel of the switch in a different way compared to the WS Red's pure nylon bottom housing. Both nylon and the blend in the Keygeek Raw's bottom housing are softer plastics that absorb more sound, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile during typing.

Overall, the housing materials used in the Keygeek Raw and the WS Red may have a significant impact on the typing experience. While both switches feature nylon in their housing materials, the Keygeek Raw's exclusive blends of UPE and Si may offer a unique tactile feel and sound profile compared to the WS Red. However, the similarities in using softer plastics that absorb more sound between the two switches may result in comparable typing experiences in terms of sound and feel. Ultimately, personal preference and the desired typing experience will play a significant role in choosing between the two switches.

Weight

When comparing the Keygeek Raw linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Red linear switch, one key difference is in their bottom out forces. The Keygeek Raw has a bottom out force of 57.5 grams, while the WS Red has a bottom out force of 67 grams, making the WS Red the heavier option. Both switches have an actuation force of None grams, meaning that they will provide a similar typing experience in terms of initial force required to trigger a keystroke. The lighter weight of the Keygeek Raw may appeal to those who prefer a more lightweight typing experience for extended periods of use, such as for work or gaming sessions. In contrast, the heavier bottom out force of the WS Red may be preferred by those who enjoy a more substantial typing feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches would depend on personal preference for actuation and bottom out forces.

Travel distance

The Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, while the Wuque Studio WS Red linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm. This means that the Keygeek Raw has a slightly shorter travel distance compared to the WS Red. The Keygeek Raw would be preferred by those looking for a quicker response time, such as gamers, due to its shorter travel distance. On the other hand, the WS Red would be more suitable for individuals who prefer a deeper key press sensation, as it has a longer travel distance. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances compared to the more traditional 4.0 mm distance, making them ideal for those looking for faster typing or gaming experiences.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Keygeek Keygeek Raw has an MSRP of $5.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Keygeek Raw for $3.51.

The Wuque Studio WS Red comes in at $3.50 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Keygeek Raw linear switch is known for its neutral profile, offering a moderate actuation force requirement and sound, suitable for a variety of users and environments. On the other hand, the sound profile of the Wuque Studio WS Red linear switch is unknown, but it is important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard and keycaps used.

In terms of feel, the Keygeek Raw switch provides a textured sensation with a slightly scratchy feel, which may be preferred by some users for its unique tactile feedback. Additionally, the switch offers a mild typing experience that falls within a safe, middle-ground zone in terms of sound and feel. In contrast, the feel of the Wuque Studio WS Red linear switch is unknown, so it is recommended to test it out firsthand to determine if it aligns with your preferences.

Considering the information provided, while the sound profiles of Keygeek Raw and Wuque Studio WS Red switches differ due to their individual material blends and design features, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences. Ultimately, the best way to determine which switch is most suitable for you is to try them out and see how they align with your typing style and preferences. Additionally, keep in mind that factors such as keycaps, keyboard build, and personal preference will also play a role in the overall typing experience.

Conclusion

To sum up, when considering whether to choose the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch or the Wuque Studio WS Red linear switch, you should take into account your preference for bottom out force, material blend, and typing experience. If you prefer a slightly lighter bottom out force and enjoy a creamy yet lightweight feel with the unique material blend of Nylon, UMPE, and Silicon, the Keygeek Raw switch would be a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a bouncier and more responsive typing experience with a heavier actuation force, along with a classic sound signature, the WS Red switch may be more to your liking. Ultimately, your decision should be based on how these factors align with your personal typing preferences and overall keyboard experience. Choose wisely to ensure maximum satisfaction with your mechanical keyboard setup.

Mentioned in this article