Durock Koala vs. Outemu Dustproof Red
An in-depth look at the Durock Koala and the Outemu Dustproof Red switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Durock Koala tactile switch to the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch, it is clear that both offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences in mechanical keyboards. The Koala stands out for its balanced tactility, providing a satisfying bump without being too overwhelming throughout the keystroke. On the other hand, the Dustproof Red offers a smooth linear feel without any tactile feedback. While the Koala appeals to those who enjoy a polished, low-pitched, and accented typing experience, the Dustproof Red remains neutral in characteristics. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
60g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The Durock Koala and the Outemu Dustproof Red both feature polycarbonate top housing, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which allows for a more clear and resonant sound experience. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that plan to utilize RGB lighting. Both switches provide similar auditory benefits with their polycarbonate top housing, offering users a consistent and premium sound experience.
In terms of bottom housing, the Durock Koala and the Outemu Dustproof Red both utilize nylon to create a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon is known for its softness and sound absorption properties, which leads to a duller and rounder sound compared to harder plastics. This results in a typing experience that is quieter and more muted, perfect for those who prefer a softer sound profile when typing. Despite having different top housing materials, the switches share a commonality in using nylon for their bottom housing, ensuring a similar typing experience in terms of sound quality.
The division of housing materials between the top and bottom of the switch allows for a balanced typing experience with distinct characteristics. While the bottom housing influences the bottom-out sound and feel when a key is pressed, the top housing plays a significant role in the sound produced when a key is released. This division creates a harmonious blend of qualities from both housing materials, enhancing the overall typing experience for users of the Durock Koala and the Outemu Dustproof Red switches. Whether it be the sharper sound profile from the polycarbonate top housing or the deeper sound profile from the nylon bottom housing, these switches offer a well-rounded typing experience with unique sonic characteristics.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Durock Koala tactile switch and the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch, it is evident that the Koala has a heavier bottom out force of 67 grams, while the Dustproof Red has a lighter bottom out force of 60 grams. The actuation force of the Koala is unknown, but the Dustproof Red has an actuation force of 45 grams. For those who prefer a more substantial typing experience, the Koala would be the preferable choice due to its heavier bottom out force. On the other hand, the Dustproof Red would be more suitable for those who prefer a lighter typing feel. Despite the differences in force, both switches provide a tactile typing experience, so users can expect similar results in terms of typing responsiveness and feedback.
Travel distance
The Durock Koala and Outemu Dustproof Red switches both have a travel distance of 4 mm, meaning that pressing down on keys with either switch will result in a similar tactile experience. Since both switches have the same travel distance, users can expect consistent actuation and bottoming out points when typing or gaming with either switch. This ensures that users will get similar results in terms of keypress feel and responsiveness. Overall, the travel distance of the Durock Koala and Outemu Dustproof Red switches are identical, making them both equally suitable options for those who prefer a 4 mm travel distance in their mechanical keyboard switches.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Durock Koala has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Koala for $4.21.
The Outemu Dustproof Red comes in at $3.10 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The Durock Koala tactile switch is known for its low-pitched sound profile, which offers a bass-heavy and mellow tone compared to higher-pitched switches. It also falls under the category of a neutral switch, providing a moderate actuation force requirement and a moderate sound profile suitable for various uses. On the other hand, the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch does not have any known descriptions regarding sound. It is important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.
When it comes to feel, the Durock Koala tactile switch is described as polished, offering a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. Additionally, it is categorized as accented, providing a medium level of tactility that is not overpowering but still noticeable. The stepped design of the Koala switch gives users the sensation of two stages during the keystroke, with some pre-travel and/or post-travel. It is also considered a stiff switch, requiring a higher amount of force to actuate and bottom-out. In contrast, there are no known descriptions available for the feel of the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch.
In conclusion, the Durock Koala tactile switch offers a unique combination of stepped tactility and polished feel, providing a tactile experience that is noticeable but not overwhelming. The low-pitched sound profile complements the tactile feedback, creating a satisfying typing experience for users who prefer a balance between feedback and sound. While the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch does not have known subjective qualities mentioned, users can expect a linear feel with potentially different sound characteristics compared to the Koala. Overall, both switches offer distinct tactile and sound profiles that cater to different preferences, but with the Koala providing a more detailed and nuanced typing experience.
Conclusion
To sum up, when choosing between the Durock Koala tactile switch and the Outemu Dustproof Red linear switch, consider your preference for key feel and sound. If you prefer a switch with a noticeable tactile bump and a bit of resonance without being excessively loud, the Durock Koala would be a good choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a smooth and polished typing experience with a medium actuation force and neutral sound profile, the Outemu Dustproof Red may be more suitable for you. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal typing preferences and whether you prioritize tactile feedback or a linear typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
