KTT Laurel vs. Bsun Tuzi (Bunny)
An in-depth look at the KTT Laurel and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the KTT Laurel and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) mechanical keyboard switches, both are linear switches but offer different features and characteristics. The KTT Laurel is known for its medium-light linear switch with a full POM housing, short travel, and long pole design, providing a balance of responsiveness and comfort. On the other hand, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) offers a refined typing experience with a modified LY stem paired with a PC top and PA bottom for a combination of clack and smoothness. While the Laurel has a subtly low-pitched sound profile, the Tuzi (Bunny) is described as clacky, high-pitched, and silky. Overall, choosing between the two switches ultimately depends on individual preferences; however, let's delve deeper beyond these generalities to help you decide on the best switch for your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
42g
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
UPE
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22m spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Laurel and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) provide distinct audio experiences based on the properties of the materials used. The POM top housing of the Laurel creates a deeper and more muted sound profile, while the polycarbonate top housing of the Tuzi produces a sharper and higher-pitched sound. Additionally, the translucent nature of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches designed with RGB lighting in mind. On the other hand, the POM bottom housing of the Laurel reinforces its deep and pleasing sound profile, while the nylon bottom housing of the Tuzi enhances the switch's sound with a fuller and rounder quality.
Despite their differences, both the Laurel and the Tuzi utilize their respective housing materials to create unique auditory experiences. The split between top and bottom housings in a switch allows for a balance of qualities to be felt during key presses, with the bottom housing influencing the bottom-out sound and feel, and the top housing impacting the sound when releasing a key. This means that while the Laurel may offer a more muted sound profile overall due to its POM housing, the Tuzi's combination of polycarbonate and nylon housings creates a dynamic range of audio feedback throughout typing or gaming sessions.
In conclusion, the choice between the KTT Laurel and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) ultimately boils down to personal preference in sound profile and aesthetic design. The POM and polycarbonate housings of the Laurel and Tuzi, respectively, offer unique auditory experiences that cater to different preferences. Whether you prefer a deeper, more muted sound profile of the Laurel or the sharper, more crisp sound of the Tuzi, both switches provide quality materials that enhance the overall typing or gaming experience. Ultimately, the decision between the two will depend on the individual's preferences in sound, feel, and visual appeal.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Laurel linear switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch, it is clear that both switches are on the lighter side. The Laurel has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, while the Tuzi has an actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 42 grams. Both switches provide a light typing experience, making them suitable for extended typing or gaming sessions. Those who prefer a more substantial typing feel may find the Laurel slightly heavier than the Tuzi, as it requires a slightly higher force to bottom out. However, overall, both switches offer a similar lightweight typing experience that is comfortable for long periods of use. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference for typing feel.
Travel distance
Comparing the travel distance of the KTT Laurel linear switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch, we can see that the Laurel has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm compared to the Tuzi's 3.6 mm. While this may not seem like a significant difference, it can impact the overall feel and responsiveness of the switch. Gamers may prefer the Laurel for its slightly faster response time due to the shorter travel distance, while those who prefer a more substantial keypress may lean towards the Tuzi. Ultimately, both switches offer a relatively similar travel distance, so users can expect comparable results in terms of keypress feel and performance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Laurel has an MSRP of $4.42 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Laurel for $3.95.
The Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Tuzi (Bunny) for $3.49.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the KTT Laurel linear switch is known for its subtly low-pitched profile, providing a more bass-heavy and mellow tone compared to higher-pitched switches. On the other hand, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch is described as clacky and high-pitched, offering a sharp and crisp sound when pressed. Depending on personal preference, the Laurel may be more appealing to those who prefer a softer sound, while the Tuzi may cater to individuals who enjoy a crisper and brighter typing experience.
In terms of feel, the Laurel switch is praised for its snappy response, delivering a super responsive typing experience that feels more alive due to its longer or dual-staged springs. In contrast, the Tuzi (Bunny) switch is described as silky, providing an exceptionally smooth typing experience that minimizes resistance when pressing and releasing keys. Depending on personal preference, the Laurel switch may be more suited for those who prioritize responsiveness, while the Tuzi switch may be preferred by those who value smoothness in their typing feel.
Overall, the KTT Laurel linear switch offers a medium-light linear switch with a subtly low-pitched sound profile and a snappy feel, striking a balance between responsiveness and comfort. On the other hand, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch provides a refined typing experience with a clacky, high-pitched sound and a silky smooth feel. While both switches have their unique qualities, individuals can expect similar results in terms of performance and satisfaction based on their sound and feel preferences.
Conclusion
To sum up, when choosing between the KTT Laurel linear switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch, consider the bottom out force, sound profile, and feel that best suits your typing preferences. If you prefer a slightly heavier bottom out force and a low-pitched sound profile with a snappy feel, the KTT Laurel switch may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force, a clacky high-pitched sound profile, and a silky smooth feel, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) switch might be more to your liking. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preference and what type of typing experience you find most enjoyable.
Mentioned in this article
