United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Lightning vs. Cherry MX Speed Silver

An in-depth look at the KTT Lightning and the Cherry MX Speed Silver switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the KTT Lightning and the Cherry MX Speed Silver both offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences and needs. The Lightning switches are ideal for those seeking quick response times, making them perfect for gaming scenarios where split-second decisions matter. On the other hand, the MX Speed Silver switches focus on maximum speed with their linear action and low spring resistance, providing a seamless typing experience for everyday use. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Pre-travel

1.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.20 mm

Total travel

3.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

pom

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the KTT Lightning and the Cherry MX Speed Silver, one noticeable difference is in the top housing. The Lightning utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile due to its stiffness. In contrast, the MX Speed Silver features a nylon top housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound thanks to its softer nature that absorbs more sound. While both materials have their own unique sound characteristics, the polycarbonate in the Lightning emphasizes clarity and resonance, while the nylon in the MX Speed Silver offers a more rounded and duller sound.

Moving on to the bottom housing, both the Lightning and the MX Speed Silver use nylon for this component. This choice results in a consistent deeper and fuller sound profile for both switches, as nylon's softer nature absorbs sound more effectively than harder plastics. The similarities in bottom housing material contribute to a shared typing experience in terms of sound and feel. Typing on switches with nylon bottom housing will likely elicit a similarly dull and round sound profile, regardless of the specific switch being used. This consistency in sound between the two switches may appeal to users seeking a specific typing experience.

Overall, the differences in top housing material between the KTT Lightning and the Cherry MX Speed Silver lead to variations in sound profiles. The polycarbonate top housing in the Lightning creates a sharp and resonant sound compared to the deeper and fuller sound produced by the nylon top housing in the MX Speed Silver. However, with both switches sharing a nylon bottom housing, users can expect a consistent deeper and fuller sound when typing. Understanding how the top and bottom housing materials influence sound profiles can help users choose the switch that best suits their preferences for typing experience and sound quality.

Weight

In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Lightning linear switch and the Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch, it is apparent that the MX Speed Silver is lighter in both aspects. The Lightning switch has an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, while the MX Speed Silver has an actuation force of 30 grams and an unknown bottom out force. The lighter actuation force of the MX Speed Silver may appeal to those who prefer a softer touch when typing, allowing for longer periods of use without fatigue. In contrast, the heavier actuation force of the KTT Lightning may provide a more substantial typing experience for those who prefer a stronger push feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference for either a lighter or heavier typing experience.

Travel distance

The travel distance of the KTT Lightning linear switch is 3 mm, while the Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. Both switches fall into the category of shorter travel distances, with the Lightning being slightly shorter than the MX Speed Silver. Gamers often prefer shorter travel distances for quicker response times, making the Lightning a popular choice for gaming. However, some users may find the shorter travel distance of the Lightning to feel too abrupt and prefer the slightly longer travel distance of the MX Speed Silver for a more substantial key press. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and the desired typing or gaming experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Cherry MX Speed Silver has an MSRP of $5.90 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the MX Speed Silver for $4.00.

The KTT Lightning comes in at $3.41 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the KTT Lightning linear switch is known for its clacky and high-pitched sound profile, providing a sharp and snappy typing experience. On the other hand, the Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch is recognized for its thocky and low-pitched sound, offering a deep and satisfying key press sound. Both switches provide unique auditory feedback that can enhance the typing or gaming experience, depending on personal preference and the overall setup of the keyboard.

When it comes to feel, the KTT Lightning switch is described as having a subtle and polished typing experience, with gentle resistance and smooth key travel. This results in a refined and sleek typing feel that may be preferred by users seeking a light and fluid key press. In contrast, the Cherry MX Speed Silver switch is noted for its textured feel, which may offer a different tactile feedback with noticeable friction when pressing the keys. This textured feel can cater to users who prefer a more tactile typing experience.

Overall, both the KTT Lightning linear switch and the Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Lightning switch provides a clacky and polished typing experience, while the MX Speed Silver switch offers a thocky and textured feel. Depending on individual preferences for sound profile and typing experience, users can choose between these two switches to achieve their desired level of performance and satisfaction. Ultimately, whether using the Lightning or the MX Speed Silver switch, users can expect a responsive and efficient typing experience that is well-suited for gaming and fast-paced tasks.

Conclusion

Therefore, when deciding between the KTT Lightning linear switch and the Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch, consider your priorities. If you prioritize speed and responsiveness in gaming or fast typing scenarios, the Lightning switches may be the better choice for you due to their low bottom out force and clacky sound profile. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with a deep and satisfying sound profile and a textured feel, the MX Speed Silver switches may be more suited to your preferences. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your individual typing and gaming style, as well as the sound and feel you find most enjoyable.

Mentioned in this article