United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Lightning vs. SP-Star Duck

An in-depth look at the KTT Lightning and the SP-Star Duck switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, two popular options include the KTT Lightning and the SP-Star Duck. The Lightning switches are best known for their "speed" capabilities, making them ideal for situations where milliseconds can make a difference between winning and losing. These switches provide a slick type feel with a clacky sound profile, which can be appealing to those who enjoy a more pronounced typing experience. On the other hand, the Duck switches offer a more subtle tactile typing experience. With a gentle tactility and a clean and crispy sound profile, these switches are perfect for those who prefer a quieter and smoother typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities, so you can best decide on the ideal switch for your specific needs and preferences.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

43g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

58g

Pre-travel

1.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

Gold plated

Housing materials

The housing materials of the KTT Lightning and the SP-Star Duck share some similarities. Both switches utilize polycarbonate in their top housings, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is because polycarbonate is a stiff plastic that resonates well, creating a clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it particularly beneficial for switches that require RGB lighting. Therefore, users can expect similar sound characteristics and visual effects when using either the Lightning or the Duck switches.

However, there is a notable difference in the bottom housings of these switches. The Lightning incorporates a nylon bottom housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. On the other hand, the Duck features a polycarbonate bottom housing, which aligns with the characteristics of its top housing. This means that the bottom-out sound and feel of the Duck switch will be sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper due to the polycarbonate material.

When it comes to typing on these switches, the bottom and top housing materials play distinct roles. The qualities of the bottom housing, whether nylon or polycarbonate, will have a significant impact on the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on the switch. Conversely, the top housing material will primarily affect the sound when releasing a key. Therefore, enthusiasts can choose between the KTT Lightning and the SP-Star Duck based on their preferences for the desired sound profiles during keypresses and releases.

Weight

When comparing the KTT Lightning linear switch and the SP-Star Duck tactile switch, there are notable differences in their actuation and bottom out forces. The actuation force of the Lightning switch is 43 grams, which is relatively light, whereas the exact actuation force of the Duck switch is unknown. However, the bottom out force of the Lightning switch is 50 grams, while the Duck switch requires a slightly heavier force of 58 grams to bottom out.

The actuation force determines the force required to trigger a keystroke, and the lighter actuation force of the Lightning switch may appeal to those who prefer a lighter and more effortless typing experience. This is especially beneficial for individuals who use their keyboard for extended periods at work or during long gaming sessions. On the other hand, the Duck switch's actuation force is unavailable, making it challenging to compare directly. However, it is worth noting that the Duck switch's bottom out force is heavier than that of the Lightning switch, which suggests a more substantial typing experience for users who prefer a stronger push feel.

Considering the weight of the switches is crucial when selecting the ideal option. Some users may prioritize a lighter switch for prolonged use, allowing them to type comfortably for extended periods. This is particularly advantageous for individuals who rely on their keyboards for work or engage in lengthy gaming sessions. Conversely, those seeking a more substantial typing experience may prefer switches with heavier forces.

In conclusion, the KTT Lightning linear switch provides a lighter actuation force and a relatively light bottom out force, while the specific actuation force of the SP-Star Duck tactile switch remains unknown. However, the Duck switch requires a heavier force to bottom out, indicating a potentially more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference and the desired typing experience.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distance of the KTT Lightning linear switch and the SP-Star Duck tactile switch, it is clear that they differ in this aspect. The Lightning has a travel distance of 3 mm, making it a shorter option. On the other hand, the Duck offers a longer travel distance of 4 mm. The Lightning's 3 mm travel distance is ideal for gamers who prioritize faster response times and a shorter key press. This allows for quick, precise actions during gaming sessions. In contrast, the Duck's 4 mm travel distance may appeal to those who prefer a deeper and more substantial key press. This additional depth can provide a more satisfying typing or gaming experience for individuals who enjoy a tactile and pronounced feedback. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference and the desired level of responsiveness and key depth.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The SP-Star Duck has an MSRP of $5.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Duck for $5.40.

The KTT Lightning comes in at $3.41 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

The KTT Lightning switches are best known for their "clacky" sound profile. This means that when you press down on the switches, they produce a sharp and snappy sound. The sound is crisp, bright, and percussive, making it suitable for those who prefer a more distinct and noticeable typing experience. On the other hand, the SP-Star Duck switches have a "neutral" sound profile. This means that they have a moderate sound with no distinct characteristics. They are not too loud or too quiet, making them suitable for various scenarios such as home or work use.

When it comes to feel, the KTT Lightning switches provide a subtle typing experience. They have a gentle resistance that is not too featherlight but still maintains a light feel when typing. Additionally, the sound signature of these switches is not resonant, making them suitable for shared spaces. The switches are also described as polished, indicating a smooth and refined finish that results in a sleek typing experience. This is due to the materials used and/or factory lubing, which reduces friction and allows for smooth key travel.

On the other hand, the SP-Star Duck switches offer a mild and gentle typing experience. They provide a more subtle tactile feedback compared to switches with more pronounced characteristics. The sound and feel of these switches are approachable for most users, as they fall within a safe and middle-ground range. The switches are also described as buttery, indicating a smooth and fluid keystroke experience. This provides a seamless and effortless typing sensation. Similar to the KTT Lightning switches, the Duck switches are also described as polished, meaning they have a smooth and refined finish for a sleek typing experience.

Overall, the KTT Lightning switches are best suited for those who prioritize speed and a noticeable sound profile. They offer a subtle and polished typing experience with a clacky sound. On the other hand, the SP-Star Duck switches are more suitable for those who prefer a more subtle tactile typing experience. They have a clean and crispy sound profile, providing a mild and buttery typing feel. Both switches offer unique qualities and can provide satisfying typing experiences, but it ultimately comes down to personal preference.

Conclusion

In closing, if you are looking for a switch that prioritizes speed and responsiveness, the KTT Lightning linear switch is the clear choice. With a light bottom out force of 50 grams, these switches are perfect for situations where split-second decisions can make or break a game. The slick typing feel and clacky sound profile also add to the overall experience. On the other hand, if you prefer a more subtle tactile typing experience, the SP-Star Duck tactile switch is the ideal option. With a slightly higher bottom out force of 58 grams, these switches offer a gentle tactility and a clean, crispy sound profile. The Duck switches are suitable for both beginners and advanced users and can be used in various settings, whether at home or work. Ultimately, the decision between the Lightning and Duck switches comes down to your personal preference for speed or subtlety in both sound and feel.

Mentioned in this article