KTT Lightning vs. Gateron Type A
An in-depth look at the KTT Lightning and the Gateron Type A switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the KTT Lightning and the Gateron Type A mechanical keyboard switches, it is important to consider their distinct characteristics and intended uses. The KTT Lightning is a linear switch that is renowned for its speed and responsiveness, making it a popular choice for gamers who rely on quick reaction times. On the other hand, the Gateron Type A is also a linear switch but is designed with a focus on a balanced typing experience, ideal for those who prefer a medium-weight switch with a deeper sound profile. While the Lightning offers a clacky and high-pitched typing feel, the Type A provides a more subdued and neutral sound experience. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches will depend on personal preference and intended use, but by diving deeper into their specific qualities, you can make the best choice for your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
43g
Actuation force
50g
Bottom-out force
50g
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
1.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
20mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the KTT Lightning and the Gateron Type A switches offer different sound profiles and typing experiences. The Lightning's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound, while the Type A's nylon top housing elicits a deeper and fuller sound. The use of polycarbonate results in a more translucent and visually appealing top housing, especially when paired with RGB lighting. On the other hand, nylon is known for absorbing more sound, leading to a rounder and less resonant typing experience.
In terms of bottom housings, both the Lightning and Type A switches use nylon, which results in a deeper and fuller sound profile. The softness of the nylon material allows for more sound absorption, creating a duller and more rounded sound when compared to harder plastics. While the top and bottom housings of a switch play a role in the overall sound profile and typing experience, the bottom housing typically has more impact on the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on the switch.
Overall, the choice between the KTT Lightning and Gateron Type A switches may come down to personal preference in terms of sound profile and typing feel. The use of polycarbonate in the Lightning's top housing creates a crisper sound with a more visually appealing design, especially when paired with RGB lighting. On the other hand, the nylon housing of the Type A switch offers a deeper and fuller sound with more sound absorption for a rounder typing experience. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities based on their housing materials, providing a variety of options for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
Weight
Comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Lightning linear switch and the Gateron Type A linear switch, the Lightning switch has a lighter actuation force of 43 grams compared to the Type A switch's 50 grams. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Lightning switch requires 50 grams, while the Type A switch needs 55 grams. This makes the Lightning switch lighter overall, as it requires less force to actuate and bottom out. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Lightning switch, as it allows for longer typing sessions with less fatigue. On the other hand, the Type A switch provides a slightly more substantial typing feel with its heavier bottom out force. Both switches offer a different typing experience, catering to individuals with varying preferences in terms of actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The KTT Lightning linear switch has a travel distance of 3 mm, making it the shorter option compared to the Gateron Type A linear switch with a travel distance of 4 mm. The shorter travel distance of the Lightning switch may appeal to gamers looking for faster response times, while the longer travel distance of the Type A switch may provide a more satisfying depth for some users. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and key feel. Both switches offer their own unique benefits, so users will need to determine which characteristics are most important to them in order to make the best decision for their typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the KTT Lightning comes in at $3.41, whereas the Gateron Type A comes in at $4.70.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to the sound of the switches, the KTT Lightning linear switch is best suited for those who enjoy a clacky and high-pitched sound profile. This sharp and snappy sound can be quite engaging and satisfying for users who prefer a more pronounced auditory feedback while typing. On the other hand, the Gateron Type A linear switch offers a more neutral and subdued sound experience, making it a versatile option for various environments. It provides a moderate actuation force requirement and a sound signature leaning towards the deeper side of the spectrum, appealing to users who prefer a quieter typing experience.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the KTT Lightning linear switch provides a subtle and polished typing experience. With a gentle resistance and refined finish, users can expect a light typing feel with smooth key travel. This makes it an excellent choice for those who appreciate a comfortable and effortless typing experience. Unfortunately, information regarding the feel of the Gateron Type A linear switch is not available, but based on the available information, it can be inferred that it may offer a similar level of comfort and smoothness in typing due to its innovative design and factory lubing techniques.
In conclusion, the KTT Lightning linear switch and the Gateron Type A linear switch each offer unique qualities in terms of sound and potentially feel. If you are looking for a switch with a clacky and high-pitched sound profile along with a subtle and polished typing feel, the Lightning switch may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with a more neutral and subdued sound profile and are seeking a comfortable typing experience, the Type A switch could be the perfect fit. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches will come down to your personal preferences in sound and typing feel.
Conclusion
Ultimately, when making a decision between the KTT Lightning linear switch and the Gateron Type A linear switch, consider your needs and preferences. If you prioritize speed and a slick, clacky sound profile, the Lightning switch may be the right choice for you, especially if milliseconds matter in your gameplay. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-weight switch with a deeper sound signature and a neutral feel, the Type A switch could be more suitable. Choose the Lightning for a light and snappy typing experience, or opt for the Type A for a more balanced sound and feel. Ultimately, both switches have their own strengths, so make sure to consider how each aligns with your typing style and preferences before making your decision.
Mentioned in this article
