United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

HMX Lotus (Heavy) vs. KTT Mallo

An in-depth look at the HMX Lotus (Heavy) and the KTT Mallo switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When selecting the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, two popular choices that stand out are the HMX Lotus (Heavy) and the KTT Mallo. The Lotus (Heavy) is a linear switch that boasts a medium-heavy actuation weight of 62.5g, delivering a satisfying bounce with each keystroke accompanied by a bright, resonant sound. This characteristic makes it particularly appealing for those who enjoy a lively typing experience and prefer linear switches that provide smooth travel without any tactile feedback. On the other hand, the KTT Mallo offers a mild tactile sensation, making it a compelling choice for typists who value subtlety and finesse in their keyboard feel. With a medium-light typing experience and a neutral sound signature, the Mallo is versatile enough for a range of typing environments, appealing to users who prefer a balanced feedback without overwhelming noise. While both switches cater to different preferences in typing style and sound, their unique features make them suitable for distinct user needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the right switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

55g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

62.5g

Bottom-out force

55g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

No

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-staged spring

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

The HMX Lotus (Heavy) and KTT Mallo switches exhibit distinct differences in their housing materials, which significantly influence the overall typing experience. The Lotus (Heavy) features a nylon top housing, while the Mallo is equipped with a polycarbonate top housing. The choice of nylon in the Lotus (Heavy) results in a sound profile that is deeper and fuller—characteristics associated with softer plastics that absorb sound waves, ultimately providing a duller and rounder auditory feedback. In contrast, the polycarbonate top housing of the Mallo contributes to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound. This stiffness allows for a more resonant sound profile, particularly when combined with RGB lighting, as the translucent nature of polycarbonate enhances the visual effect. Thus, while both switches serve identical functions, their top housing materials lead to markedly different aural experiences.

The bottom housings of the two switches showcase a noteworthy similarity, as both the Lotus (Heavy) and Mallo utilize nylon for this construction. The consistency in material choice for the bottom housing means that both switches will deliver similar deeper and fuller sound profiles at the point of bottoming out. Because nylon effectively absorbs sound, the impact on auditory feedback when the key is fully pressed down would be akin for both types. Therefore, users can expect a significant degree of consistency in the tactile and sound sensations generated when these particular switch types are fully engaged, indicating a strong reliance on nylon's inherent acoustic properties.

When considering the overall performance of the HMX Lotus (Heavy) and KTT Mallo, it becomes apparent that the disparate materials for their top housings play a substantial role in defining their acoustic outcomes. While the nylon bottom housing in both switches establishes a solid and similar foundation in terms of sound absorption, the top housing dictates how they resonate when keys are released. Users seeking a fuller and more subdued sound would gravitate towards the Lotus (Heavy), whereas those desiring a sharper, more vibrant typing experience might prefer the KTT Mallo. Ultimately, the combination of differing top materials with matching bottom housings results in an intriguing exploration of sound profile dynamics in mechanical switches.

Weight

The HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch offer different experiences regarding actuation and bottom-out forces. The Lotus (Heavy) requires an actuation force of 55 grams, which gives it a heavier feel, appealing to users who prefer a more substantial typing experience. Conversely, the KTT Mallo's actuation force is unknown, but its bottom out force is 55 grams, categorizing it as medium-light. This discrepancy suggests that the Mallo may provide a lighter overall response compared to the Lotus, which has a bottom out force of 62.5 grams, making it the heavier of the two. Typists who favor longer sessions might lean toward the Mallo for its potential comfort, while those who enjoy a firmer keypress may find the Lotus (Heavy) more satisfying. Overall, the Lotus (Heavy) provides a stronger tactile feedback, whereas the Mallo's characteristics may cater to those who prefer a softer touch.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch, there is a clear distinction between the two. The Lotus (Heavy) features a travel distance of 3.5 mm, making it the shorter option, while the Mallo has a longer travel distance of 4 mm. This 4.0 mm distance is notable as it aligns with the most traditional travel specifications. Shorter travel distances like that of the Lotus can lead to faster response times, making them more appealing for gamers who prioritize speed and quick actions. In contrast, the Mallo's longer travel distance may provide a deeper and more satisfying tactile experience, preferred by users who enjoy a more substantial feel when pressing the key. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches hinges on individual preference for responsiveness versus depth.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The HMX Lotus (Heavy) has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus (Heavy) for $2.99.

The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

The HMX Lotus (Heavy) switch generates a bright and resonant sound, ideal for users who appreciate an audibly engaging typing experience. This prominent audio feedback not only enhances the tactile responsiveness but also adds a lively character to each keystroke. In contrast, the KTT Mallo switch possesses a neutral sound signature that neither overwhelms nor fades away, making it suitable for various environments, be it home or office. Its subdued sound profile ensures that it doesn't distract from the typing experience, while still providing a satisfying auditory response during use.

In terms of feel, the Lotus (Heavy) boasts a medium-heavy actuation force of 62.5g that delivers a super bouncy sensation, making every keystroke feel delightful and energetic. This heavier resistance can create a more robust feedback feel for those who prefer a solid typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Mallo switch emphasizes a light and feathery touch, with a gentle tactility that offers subtle feedback without being intrusive. Its mild, stepped action allows for a more approachable typing experience, making it comfortable for long sessions. Overall, while the Lotus (Heavy) provides a more dynamic feel with its heavier weight and pronounced bounce, the Mallo presents a lighter and smoother typing sensation that leans towards finesse.

In summary, the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switch and KTT Mallo tactile switch cater to different preferences in both sound and feel. The Lotus offers a vibrant acoustic experience combined with a heavier actuation force that promotes an engaging typing dynamic, while the Mallo ensures versatility with its neutral sound and light, gentle feedback. Each switch excels in its own right: if you’re looking for a lively and bouncy feel, the Lotus will delight, whereas if you prefer a more subdued touch with a mild tactile response, the Mallo will serve you well. Both switches provide distinct advantages, making your choice largely dependent on personal typing style and environment.

Conclusion

To conclude, choosing between the HMX Lotus (Heavy) linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and specific use cases. If you appreciate a bouncy feel with a weightier bottom-out force and enjoy a more resonant sound, the Lotus (Heavy) is likely your best bet. Its 62.5g actuation weight offers a satisfying typing experience, making it ideal for gamers or those who indulge in long typing sessions while responding to the energetic feedback of each keystroke. Conversely, if you're looking for something more subtle and balanced, particularly for extended writing or office work, the KTT Mallo switch stands out. With a medium-light actuation force of 55g and a mild tactile feedback, it provides comfort without overwhelming your fingers, which is especially beneficial if you have long days of typing ahead. The Mallo’s neutral sound profile also makes it a versatile option for various environments, allowing you to focus on your tasks without the distraction of noise. Ultimately, your choice should reflect both your typing style and the environments in which you’ll use your keyboard.

Mentioned in this article