Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. HMX Lucky
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the HMX Lucky switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the HMX Lucky stand out as two impressive options for enthusiasts seeking a linear switch experience. The Lotus V2 is a highly sought-after switch, renowned for its smooth actuation and consistent keystrokes, which can enhance typing speed and reduce fatigue during long sessions. In contrast, the HMX Lucky switch offers a distinct typing experience characterized by its softer, glittery nylon housings, delivering a neutrality that many users find deeply satisfying. While the Lotus V2 may appeal to those prioritizing a crisp and linear feel for competitive gaming or brisk typing, the HMX Lucky's lightweight design might attract users looking for comfort and tactile pleasure. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the optimal switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
43g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm double-staged spring
Housing materials
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the HMX Lucky showcase contrasting housing materials in their designs, specifically concerning the top and bottom housings. The Lotus V2 employs POM (Polyoxymethylene) for both the top and bottom housings, which is known for producing a unique, pleasing sound profile. Its characteristics lead to a deeper, more muted sound when keys are pressed. In contrast, the HMX Lucky uses nylon for both the top and bottom housing. Nylon is celebrated as a classic switch material that produces a fuller and deeper sound due to its softer, sound-absorbing properties. This divergence in materials signifies that while both switches promote a rich sound experience, their tonal qualities differ based on the inherent characteristics of POM and nylon.
When analyzing the impact of these materials on user experience, it is essential to note how the top and bottom housings influence the overall sound signature of each switch. With the Lotus V2 featuring POM on both ends, the sound produced is likely to be more muted and controlled, allowing for a pleasant auditory experience without harshness. Conversely, the nylon construction of the HMX Lucky will make for a slightly more pronounced bottom-out sound as the material compresses and absorbs impact. Although both switches deliver a deep sound profile, the choice of POM in the Lotus V2 may yield results that are consistently smooth and subtle, while the nylon in the Lucky introduces a fuller resonance that appeals to those who favor a more vibrant auditory response.
Ultimately, the differentiation between the housing materials hints at personalized preferences rather than a definitive superiority of one over the other. Users seeking a more muted, refined typing experience may prefer the Jerrzi Lotus V2, while those inclined toward a richer, more resonant feedback might opt for the HMX Lucky. Regardless of the choice, both switches guarantee a compelling auditory experience; however, the distinct sonic attributes will emerge based on the respective materials and their interaction with the keystrokes. Each switch's unique sound profile can be enjoyed based on personal preferences for deeper, more muted tones versus fuller, rounder acoustics.
Weight
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the HMX Lucky linear switch present a clear contrast in terms of actuation force, with the Lotus V2 requiring 45 grams to trigger a keystroke, while the Lucky has a lighter actuation force of 37 grams. This means that users of the Lucky switch will experience a lighter typing experience, making it more comfortable for extended typing sessions or gaming marathons. However, the Lotus V2's actuation force offers a more substantial push feel, catering to those who prefer a firmer key press for tactile feedback. Regarding bottom out force, the Lucky switch has a bottom out force of 43 grams, providing a definitive feeling when the key is fully pressed down. In contrast, the bottom out force for the Lotus V2 remains unknown, which leaves a gap in comparative analysis on that aspect. Overall, however, for typing comfort and endurance, the lighter HMX Lucky linear switch may be more appealing, while the heavier Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch might attract those who enjoy a more pronounced keystroke.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch features a travel distance of 3.4 mm, while the HMX Lucky linear switch has a longer travel distance of 3.8 mm. This distinction means that the Lotus V2 offers a shorter travel distance compared to the Lucky switch. For gamers or users seeking faster response times, the Lotus V2 may be more appealing due to its reduced travel distance, which facilitates quicker actuation. Conversely, the HMX Lucky, with its longer travel distance, may be preferred by those who appreciate a more substantial tactile experience, as it provides a deeper feel when pressing the keys. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on individual preferences regarding responsiveness and key depth.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The HMX Lucky has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lucky for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch lacks distinct sound characteristics that stand out, making it a versatile option for users who prefer a quieter typing experience. In contrast, the HMX Lucky linear switch, known for its softer and glittery nylon housings, has a more neutral sound profile that complements its lightweight design. While both switches may not draw significant attention in terms of auditory feedback, personal preferences in board and keycap selections can influence their overall sound output, potentially giving users a similar acoustic experience.
When it comes to feel, the Lotus V2 does not have an explicit description, leaving its tactile feedback somewhat ambiguous. On the other hand, the Lucky switch is praised for providing a deeply satisfying typing experience, characterized by its smooth actuation and overall comfort. This quality may lead to a more enjoyable or even addictive sensation during extended typing or gaming sessions, which contrasts with the uncertain feel of the Lotus V2.
In conclusion, while the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch remains an enigma with no highlighted qualities, the HMX Lucky linear switch offers notable features with its neutral sound and comfortable feel. For users seeking a reliable and satisfying switch experience, opting for the Lucky is a more assured choice, whereas those drawn to the Lotus V2 might be left exploring its potential without clear guidance. Ultimately, both switches cater to varying preferences, and selecting the right one will depend on personal taste and typing habits.
Conclusion
To conclude, when deciding between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the HMX Lucky linear switch, your choice should depend on your specific typing preferences and use case. If you favor a lightweight touch and desire a typing experience that is both smooth and neutral, the HMX Lucky switch might be your best bet, especially with its 43-gram bottom-out force that offers a satisfying feedback without being overly strenuous on your fingers. This makes it particularly appealing for extended typing sessions or gaming, as the soft nylon housing contributes to a more comfortable experience. On the other hand, if you are looking for a more specialized switch that may provide unique qualities suited for particular preferences, you may want to explore the Lotus V2 despite the lack of detailed specifications available. Ultimately, the choice hinges on whether you lean towards a more defined tactile response with the Lucky, or if you are intrigued by the potential characteristics of the Lotus V2 that are yet to be fully realized. Choosing between these two switches reflects your personal typing style and preferences, so weigh your options carefully!
Mentioned in this article
