Jerrzi Lotus V2 vs. KTT Mallo
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the KTT Mallo switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch, there are distinct differences that cater to different preferences and typing styles. The Lotus V2 is best known for its smooth linear feel, perfect for those who prefer a consistent keystroke without any tactile feedback. On the other hand, the Mallo switches offer a subtle tactile bump that provides just enough feedback for typists without being too pronounced. Additionally, the neutral sound signature of the Mallo makes it a versatile choice for various typing environments. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the KTT Mallo both offer unique sound profiles, with the Lotus V2 featuring a POM top housing for a deeper and more muted sound, while the Mallo's polycarbonate top housing provides a sharper and crisper sound. The use of POM in the Lotus V2's bottom housing results in a deeper sound profile, while the Mallo's nylon bottom housing creates a fuller and rounder sound. Despite these differences, both switches offer a satisfying and unique typing experience due to the qualities of their respective housing materials.
The aesthetic differences between the Lotus V2 and the Mallo also come into play with their housing materials. The clear polycarbonate top housing of the Mallo allows for RGB lighting to shine through, enhancing the visual appeal of the switch. In contrast, the opaque POM top housing of the Lotus V2 may not offer the same visual flair but contributes to a more muted sound profile. The nylon bottom housing of the Mallo and the POM bottom housing of the Lotus V2 offer contrasting sound profiles, with the softer nylon absorbing more sound compared to the stiffer POM material.
Overall, the choice between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 and the KTT Mallo will ultimately come down to personal preference in terms of sound profile and aesthetics. While the Lotus V2 offers a deeper and more muted sound due to its POM housing materials, the Mallo provides a crisper and sharper sound with its polycarbonate and nylon housing combination. Both switches have their unique strengths, but it will depend on individual preferences for sound and visual appeal to determine which switch is the right fit. Despite their differences in housing materials, both switches offer a satisfying typing experience that caters to different preferences.
Weight
When comparing the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch in terms of actuation force and bottom out force, it is evident that the Lotus V2 is lighter with an actuation force of 45 grams compared to the Mallo's unknown actuation force. However, the Mallo has a heavier bottom out force of 55 grams, whereas the Lotus V2's bottom out force is not provided. This means that the Lotus V2 may provide a lighter typing experience with a lower actuation force, ideal for extended typing sessions or gaming. On the other hand, the Mallo offers a more substantial push feel with a higher bottom out force, appealing to those who prefer a stronger typing experience. Overall, the choice between the two switches would depend on individual preferences for typing feel and force requirements.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, which is shorter than the KTT Mallo tactile switch with a travel distance of 4 mm. The Lotus V2 offers a quicker response time, making it ideal for gamers who need fast reaction speeds. On the other hand, the Mallo provides a deeper key press feel, which some users may prefer for a more satisfying typing experience. Both switches have their own advantages based on the desired typing experience, with the Lotus V2 offering a shorter travel distance for fast-paced activities and the Mallo offering a longer travel distance for a more tactile feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and typing style.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The KTT Mallo has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mallo for $4.40.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Lotus V2 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch offer different experiences. The Lotus V2 lacks a prominent sound profile, making it a quiet option for those who prefer a more subtle typing experience. On the other hand, the Mallo switch is described as having a neutral sound signature, which means it strikes a balance between being audible without being distracting. Ultimately, both switches provide options for those who prefer a quieter typing experience, with the Mallo offering a slightly more noticeable sound profile.
In terms of feel, the Lotus V2 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch also differ in their typing experience. The Lotus V2's tactile feel remains unspecified, leaving its typing experience open to interpretation. Conversely, the Mallo switch is described as offering a mild and subtle typing experience with a feathery feel, meaning it requires minimal exertion from the fingers. This light actuation force can reduce finger fatigue and make it comfortable for extended typing sessions. Ultimately, the Mallo switch provides a gentle and comfortable typing experience, while the Lotus V2's tactile feel remains unspecified.
In conclusion, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch offer different subjective qualities when it comes to sound and feel. While the Lotus V2 remains undefined in terms of tactile feel, it is known for its quiet sound profile. On the other hand, the Mallo switch is praised for its subtle and mild typing experience with a neutral sound signature. Both switches provide options for those who prefer a more subdued typing experience, with the Mallo offering a slightly more noticeable tactile feel. Overall, choosing between these switches will depend on individual preferences for sound and feel, with both options providing a solid choice for versatile typing environments.
Conclusion
Bringing it all together, when deciding between the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch and the KTT Mallo tactile switch, consider the unique qualities each switch offers. If you value a smooth typing experience without any tactile feedback and prefer a switch with no bottom out force, the Lotus V2 may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you appreciate a gentle tactile bump for feedback, along with a medium-light bottom out force, the Mallo switch is a great option. Whether you prioritize a neutral sound profile or a subdued sound, or if you prefer a feathery, mild, stepped, or subtle typing feel, each switch caters to different preferences. Ultimately, your decision should be based on what type of typing experience you value most – whether it be smooth and linear or subtly tactile.
Mentioned in this article
